You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I think we can conclusively say that fossil fuels are bad. They have destroyed our environment and caused the extinction of life.
ActuallyIf the world ran on sun, it wouldn’t fight over oil | Bill McKibben
The last time we started down this path, in Iraq more than 15 years ago, a solar panel cost 10 times what it does today. Wind power was still in its infancy. No one you knew had ever driven an electric car. Today the sun and the breeze are the cheapest ways to generate power on our Earth, and Chinese factories are churning out electric vehicles. That is to say, we have the technology available to us that would render this kind of warmongering transparently absurd even to the most belligerent soul.
You are a true pioneer, putting the environment ahead of personal safety.Actually
1) in 1974 (appx 45 years ago , but 40 when i found the statistic) Solar PV was ~$101/watt. about 15 - 20 years prior to that, late 1950's very early 1960's PV was ~$600+/watt.
{{{{Robert Heinlein wrote a science fiction story 10 - 15 years before that late 1940's early 50's about the "Douglas - Martin sun screens" (co invented by a lady) that were inexpensive, collected sunlight for electricity and were inexpensive and ubiquitous}}}}
You can now buy PV panels for 25 - 40 cents a watt
The drop in cost is not 10X its more like 100x - 250X
my first PV array was 26sq meters and 1,184 watts and was around $9,000 - $10,000 (50 - 60% subsidized in 1999
my 2nd PV array is 59.9 sq meters and 11,655 watts and $31,000 (with 30% tax credit) ~$2.70/watt
my first PV array made 11% of my needs/monthly use.
my second PV array makes 200% of my needs/monthly use even though it it 10x the size, it makes ~20x due to lowered use, LED's, extremely efficient 30cubic ft refrigerator, computers, monitors etc all way less power required. (we did raise 2 children plus dozens of their friends so used a llt of electricity to do so)
(in 1974 it would have cost $1.18 million or $6.99 million in 1956)
2) Some of us (me for instance) drove, but didnt own EV's as far back as the mid 1970's, but it was a "death trap" ran on PbA (lead acid)batteries (it was a 'leadsled') and could go ~35 mph downhill (~50kph) 1974 ElCar (based on Fiat 500 chassis)
( i never dressed like that)
then had a CitiCar
(mine was blue)
View attachment 458435
and also a deathtrap unless on local roads
I call willful ignorance on your part.So what are you willing to give up? We could all go back to living like our ancestors. No real need for smart phones, televisions, dishwashers, washing machines, heating and air conditioning, etc, etc. By the way if you look at the data there are no more super storms, floods and droughts than in the past.
Actually, replace "fossil fuels" with inexpensive free energy, manufactured from sunlight.There are more trees in the US than 100 years ago. In addition CO2 helps plants grow and is actually helping green the planet. However, overall the number of trees is going down because of what is going on in other countries. If you look at Haiti versus Dominican Republic you can see what happens when you do not have access to fossil fuels. Haiti is almost devoid of trees because they do not have ready access to fossil fuels..
We have more trees in the US because we have outsourced our slash and burn agriculture to the Amazon.Actually, replace "fossil fuels" with inexpensive free energy, manufactured from sunlight.
If you have free or extremely inexpensive electricity, you don't need fossil fuels, except you then disrupt a $2-3 TRILLION a year fossil fuel industry and decentralize power (and control) of all types
@mspohrYou are a true pioneer, putting the environment ahead of personal safety.
(Are you sure you didn't dress like that?)
Actually
1) in 1974 (appx 45 years ago , but 40 when i found the statistic) Solar PV was ~$101/watt. about 15 - 20 years prior to that, late 1950's very early 1960's PV was ~$600+/watt.
{{{{Robert Heinlein wrote a science fiction story 10 - 15 years before that late 1940's early 50's about the "Douglas - Martin sun screens" (co invented by a lady) that were inexpensive, collected sunlight for electricity and were inexpensive and ubiquitous}}}}
You can now buy PV panels for 25 - 40 cents a watt
The drop in cost is not 10X its more like 100x - 250X
my first PV array was 26sq meters and 1,184 watts and was around $9,000 - $10,000 (50 - 60% subsidized in 1999
my 2nd PV array is 59.9 sq meters and 11,655 watts and $31,000 (with 30% tax credit) ~$2.70/watt
my first PV array made 11% of my needs/monthly use.
my second PV array makes 200% of my needs/monthly use even though it it 10x the size, it makes ~20x due to lowered use, LED's, extremely efficient 30cubic ft refrigerator, computers, monitors etc all way less power required. (we did raise 2 children plus dozens of their friends so used a llt of electricity to do so)
(in 1974 it would have cost $1.18 million or $6.99 million in 1956)
2) Some of us (me for instance) drove, but didnt own EV's as far back as the mid 1970's, but it was a "death trap" ran on PbA (lead acid)batteries (it was a 'leadsled') and could go ~35 mph downhill (~50kph) 1974 ElCar (based on Fiat 500 chassis)
( i never dressed like that)
then had a CitiCar
(mine was blue)
View attachment 458435
and also a deathtrap unless on local roads
And he looks good in those plaid pantswinfield... much respect. You sound cool as hell
And he looks good in those plaid pants
Full article at:Measurements of Arctic sea ice at the end of this summer are the second lowest since modern record-keeping began in the 1970s, according to newly released preliminary findings.
According to NASA and the National Snow and Ice Data Center (NSIDC), Arctic sea level extent (the area of ocean covered by ice) is tied with 2007 and 2016 for second lowest, just behind the record minimum set in 2012. An analysis of satellite data shows the 2019 minimum extent measured 4.15 million square kilometers (1.6 million square miles) as of last week.
“This year’s minimum sea ice extent shows that there is no sign that the sea ice cover is rebounding,” said Claire Parkinson, a climate change senior scientist at NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center, in a statement. “The long-term trend for Arctic sea ice extent has been definitively downward. But in recent years, the extent is low enough that weather conditions can either make that particular year’s extent into a new record low or keep it within the group of the lowest.”
<snip>
Or you could drive an EV and add solar to your home so you can be energy independent and save a good bit of money to boot.So what are you willing to give up? We could all go back to living like our ancestors. No real need for smart phones, televisions, dishwashers, washing machines, heating and air conditioning, etc, etc. By the way if you look at the data there are no more super storms, floods and droughts than in the past.