mangrove79
Member
Like everyone else has pointed out already, this story just has so many head-scratchers. Things just don't add up or make sense, at least until the investigation finds that plausible explanation.
- PB doesn't take you from 70+ mph to zero unless someone gives me an example of this happening. AP might if the driver is not responding to visual and audio prompts. Even if AP disengaged due to driver not responding, it doesn't slam the brakes but rather coast to a stop.
- Driver in the front car killed. It's almost always the following car(s) driver that gets shafted in this type of accident, but they were uninjured. Not just they didn't die, but they didn't suffer any injuries at all. Either they were both driving 80's Volvos or the collisions weren't too violent.
- There is a passenger. It's unlikely both the driver and passenger fell asleep, so that kinda rules out the driver falling asleep. Of course, it could happen if the passenger was completely distracted.
- The driver is 74 years old. Not significant by itself, but with the other observations I wonder if health issues could've played a role.