jgleigh
Member
Certainly looks like a different system from Powerwall+.The plan set lists the part number as Powerwall 3 [240V] # 1707000-0-G 11.5 kW / 13.5 kWh
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Certainly looks like a different system from Powerwall+.The plan set lists the part number as Powerwall 3 [240V] # 1707000-0-G 11.5 kW / 13.5 kWh
What size breaker is your Powerwall 3 connected to?A friend who lives a couple miles away also has Tesla solar and PW on order. His plans call for PW+, not PW3. And his installation date is scheduled for one week before ours. It seems random that PW3 was spec'd for our installation but to be clear, our plans very clearly call out PW3 whereas his calls out PW+. What's crazier is his order was placed just a couple months ago. Ours was placed back in February.
100A. They're relocating everything to a new 225A subpanel that's downstream of a Backup Gateway.What size breaker is your Powerwall 3 connected to?
Andy,8/21/2023 - Installation confirmed for 9/7/2023. Progress! Will it be a PW3 per the installation plans? Tune in to find out!
The one below it is the Powerwall+ so I think it just means it has a built-in inverter so you can attach solar to the unit directly.Wow, based on the table "PV DC Input Capability" was checked "Y". Could this mean that the Powerwalls could now directly input solar? This would eliminate the need for a sperate inverter and make Powerwall+ not needed.
I agree; that would make the higher maximum output a combination of the battery and the solar inverter.The one below it is the Powerwall+ so I think it just means it has a built-in inverter so you can attach solar to the unit directly.
The branch circuit for the Powerwall 3 is 100A or the subfeed?100A. They're relocating everything to a new 225A subpanel that's downstream of a Backup Gateway.
EDIT: The diagram shows a 50A breaker inside the Backup Gateway feeding the PW3. I suppose that's cutting it close if the PW3 is capable of outputting a sustained 11kW. 100A is the main breaker at the meter. That's not changing.
Sorry, I was confused by the original question.The branch circuit for the Powerwall 3 is 100A or the subfeed?
With the approx 11 kW inverter of the PW3 I assumed a 60A breaker would be used for the branch circuit.
Sorry, I was confused by the original question.
The main breaker to the house is 100A and that's not changing.
The line diagram shows a 50A breaker inside the Backup Gateway which connects to the PW3. So yes, I agree that a 60A breaker seems like it'd be a better choice given the PW3's higher output. Hopefully this won't be a big deal; I can't picture many scenarios where the load on the PW3 would be that high, frankly.
I think I get it. Solar can produce up to 20kwh, inverter can supply up to 20kwh with solar+battery@TJ21CT what do you mean by 20kWh in/out?
Bumping up from previous Powerwall + specs of continuous power. I believe it was 9.6/10 without looking.@TJ21CT what do you mean by 20kWh in/out?
That would require a 100A breaker. The current Powerwall+ requires a 50A breaker since its max continuous output is 9.6kW (40A).I think I get it. Solar can produce up to 20kwh, inverter can supply up to 20kwh with solar+battery
That's seems right!Wow, based on the table "PV DC Input Capability" was checked "Y". Could this mean that the Powerwalls could now directly input solar? This would eliminate the need for a sperate inverter and make Powerwall+ not needed.