-
Want to remove ads? Register an account and login to see fewer ads, and become a Supporting Member to remove almost all ads.
Elon Musk Discussion - Tesla Brand Damage
- Thread starter Chucko
- Start date
- Status
zoomer0056
Active Member
The shareholders have spoken. They say Elon Musk is integral to Tesla's future.
Last edited:
I'm sort of torn on how to think of this from a rational point of view.
As someone who actually drives a Tesla this is bad news since the man has no interest in cars anymore.
I'm not a share holder but if I were I sort of see the logic in voting for it. Running Tesla as memestock is great for share prices. And it's really hard to have a memestock with stable competent leadership.
As someone who actually drives a Tesla this is bad news since the man has no interest in cars anymore.
I'm not a share holder but if I were I sort of see the logic in voting for it. Running Tesla as memestock is great for share prices. And it's really hard to have a memestock with stable competent leadership.
WSJ timed this hit piece right before the end of shareholder votes, yet it has no effect. People are increasingly seeing through mainstream media's FUD, the real brand damage done here is to the mainstream media themselves.
It’s a comp package. He gets to Purchase an allocated bundle of stock. Why anyone would see a package allowing him to Invest back into the company as bad is comical to me.
israndy
Supercharger Hunter
You should start a company then! Take it from the brink of bankruptcy and bet it all on a win for all and you to can be a share holder. Good luck!
Musk’s vision for Tesla does not align with my vision for the vehicle and services I desire out of my current and future vehicle ownership. As a Tesla owner, I don’t believe Musk can lead the company to deliver at or above my expectations. I don’t believe he is the right person to be CEO for Tesla.
Since I am not an investor, the pay package wouldn’t normally concern me. This is not a normal situation.
I don't want Musk to continue as CEO, so why would I want anyone to give him motivation to continue in that capacity?
I also don’t think it’s okay for a board to put Tesla resources into reversing a court decision where they were found liable for misconduct. As I’ve stated in this thread before, I believe the better approach would have been to come up with new goals to be met over the next 5 years and only pay out if Musk were to meet those new goals.
Time will tell if Musk can lead Tesla to deliver vehicles I want to own over the competition. I have my doubts, but Tesla could prove me wrong. My disappointment is because I am highly pessimistic that I will want future Tesla vehicles based on Musk’s vision - or lack thereof - for Tesla vehicles.
Since I am not an investor, the pay package wouldn’t normally concern me. This is not a normal situation.
I don't want Musk to continue as CEO, so why would I want anyone to give him motivation to continue in that capacity?
I also don’t think it’s okay for a board to put Tesla resources into reversing a court decision where they were found liable for misconduct. As I’ve stated in this thread before, I believe the better approach would have been to come up with new goals to be met over the next 5 years and only pay out if Musk were to meet those new goals.
Time will tell if Musk can lead Tesla to deliver vehicles I want to own over the competition. I have my doubts, but Tesla could prove me wrong. My disappointment is because I am highly pessimistic that I will want future Tesla vehicles based on Musk’s vision - or lack thereof - for Tesla vehicles.
And… more conflict of interest… 
/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/23906797/VRG_Illo_STK022_K_Radtke_Musk_Scales.jpg)
www.theverge.com
Tesla investors sue Elon Musk for launching a rival AI company
xAI is now the subject of a new lawsuit.
www.theverge.com
That court decision was just in Delaware....a system that even Hunter Biden exposed
Citizens for a Pro-Business Delaware: “Washington Post Reporting on Hunter Biden Exposes Depths of Chancery Court Dysfunction”
Today, following reporting from the Washington Post that Hunter Biden threatened to bring suit against a former business partner in the Chancery Court
www.businesswire.com
Seems like "Citizens for a Pro-Business Delaware" is based on those on the losing side of a legal dispute between the founders of a company called TransPerfect. So no surprise that they do not like Delaware courts.That court decision was just in Delaware....a system that even Hunter Biden exposed
Citizens for a Pro-Business Delaware: “Washington Post Reporting on Hunter Biden Exposes Depths of Chancery Court Dysfunction”
Today, following reporting from the Washington Post that Hunter Biden threatened to bring suit against a former business partner in the Chancery Courtwww.businesswire.com
I’m not going to get dragged into a debate about the validity of the court with anyone.That court decision was just in Delaware....a system that even Hunter Biden exposed
Citizens for a Pro-Business Delaware: “Washington Post Reporting on Hunter Biden Exposes Depths of Chancery Court Dysfunction”
Today, following reporting from the Washington Post that Hunter Biden threatened to bring suit against a former business partner in the Chancery Courtwww.businesswire.com
Until the court has action taken against it to prove wrong-doing, I am going to assume they made the correct decision and that musk and the board conducted themselves in an illegal manner when the pay package was originally voted upon.
lol. You Really think he would fall for that Again? He achieved Every goal as the shareholders and board set. And he was not awarded the Earned comp package and you think they will do it again. Too funny.
I'm unclear as to what exactly this vote means. Is it legally binding or is it just for optics?
arstechnica.com
Tesla shareholders re-approve Elon Musk’s $44.9 billion pay package
Court battle over pay plan will continue despite Musk winning shareholder vote.
arstechnica.com
zoomer0056
Active Member
israndy
Supercharger Hunter
I heard it was just a confirmation vote that Tesla would take back to the court on appeal. "SEE, we were not coercing the shareholders"
The real brand damage might be, just hear me out, the allegations that the CEO is a drug added sex pest.
- Status
Similar threads
