Yes, they did.
If a short-seller owed 100 shares of SCTY to their broker, that was converted to a debt of 11 shares of TSLA owed to their broker.
yes. just some perspective after reading through a bunch of really good posts the last few days.
and just to be clear, (not trying to oversimplify or underestimate anyone’s understanding here) it’s more for those who aren’t as glued to the everyday goings on..and i’m certainly no expert, but
one shouldn’t think of shorts as one total balance from the start to the finish. there’s a lot of recycling of position going on in between then and now. as the stock moves and the rates move there’s covering and reinstating of short position. jockeying, ebbs and flows. and don’t forget derivatives. you have bond market, options market, CFDs (no trading allowed to US holders, but still significant market - and all OTC, the providers hedge positions, mostly by opposite stock position as cfd, prob some opt activity too)
although the 13f filing is supposed to include some of those as well as stock.
SEC.gov | Form 13F-Reports Filed by Institutional Investment Managers but these reports are past tense and can easily be misconstrued or gamed.
on a slight tangent, someone posted a good finding about the april 250 puts (ahead of the moody’s downgrade) and mr renz (i think) about activity during quiet periods. it’s not just to think of it as they go out and sell naked 1mm shares. and id venture to guess chanos probaby isn’t even in the top 10 of most shorted total at stake. the ~60 page excerpt that jesslivenomore included from the divide by taibbi... it mentions loeb chanos cohen and sender, but think of all the funds/algos that piggy backed the short of fairfax. that’s happening here probably multiple fold.. what’s the latest tally? 12bb short interest?
that’s a lot. and that’s only reported by the exchange every 15 days, which honestly does represent decent accuracy, but when tesla isn’t range bound, think of the volatility. in the periods wher the stock moves $50-$80 in a matter of 15 days..that’s happened both up and down over the last few years (but the more common $15-$30 swings also proved plenty of movement for options leverage ) that short interest number could swing a lot during those times when positions turnover and initiate again. then overlay it with the news cycle where it feels like “when it rains it pours”. now you start to realize this none of this is a coincidence.
on the lighter side, some similar arguments can be made for the upside as well i guess. however, i like those days
they seem more righteous than malicious