I’m gonna categorize it into zero sum as most people that tend to run in apolitical circles in their daily life will never hear about it or won’t care as they get into their Tesla to go to work, picking up a Starbucks on the way and texting while driving on their iPhone — All companies/products that have their fair share of controversies depending who you ask.
I would agree that to be the case for the time period immediately right after the attack happened (there's always going to be those who want to take advantage of the situation). What is telling is what happens afterwards as facts and reports actually comes out... for now I'll let y'all come to your own conclusions about that.
Yes, you posted articles which we know are often so biased that you can’t take them as fact. It took six years for the Russia collusion hoax to all fall apart but the media was reporting it as fact the whole time. The same folks that quickly dismissed Hunter‘s laptop as false, which we know it isn’t. Let’s not forget Paul Pelosi’s DUI which was reported as a minor accident then weeks later we found out he blew through a stop sign totaling his car and another person’s car, tried to get out of it by saying he was Nancy’s husband and also flashing his police donor card.
Too bad Elon didn’t.
I give this a half thumbs-up, it was possibly premature, we'll see. And I may have been wrong about it being an experiment. Or a rogue employee inside Twitter who posted it without Elon's permission bc he fired the CEO?
Apples and elephants. I highly respect Elon, have been a follower of him and all of his business ventures since 2011 and a stockholder of TSLA since 2011. I was actually looking forward to the changes he planned to make at Twitter. But to make this totally bonehead move on the third day after he took ownership of the company really disappoints me, I had hoped he was better than that, especially after watching The Elon Musk Show series on BBC recently. I seriously hope he gets some better advice and starts listening to some more rational people in the near future. I hope that taking something like Ambien to help with his sleep isn't messing with him (as it's being implied on Twitter).
I'm pretty sure that aside from GM pulling ads, there have been no content related changes caused by changes at Twitter - so any changes you see are simply confirmation bias. Which is humorous because someone else had similar examples of the same phenomena a few pages before you posted this.
Suppression IS moderation. It's the same thing as when moderators here move content into the "you've been naughty" threads.
Yep - a good example are arguments about global warming - there are no good scientific arguments that it's not happening and will drastically change the environment we live in. Yet people insist on claiming that both sides of the argument must be presented and the media especially (even social media), is bad at this because arguments drive viewership which drives advertising revenue.
Elon does a great job of smearing himself - no outside groups necessary.
Yes, in the post that you disagreed with, I said he shot himself in the foot. I’d prefer he not comment on this type of stuff.
Both sides do need to chill.
Trump broke the left. I say that as someone who has voted Dem in basically ever election for the past 25 years.
Nonsense...a CEO is allowed a little frivolity in their life...and while the thought that Hillary has been replaced by a doppelgänger is plainly ludicrous...it would explain a lot..
