EVNow
Well-Known Member
More important stuff. Since US regulators are generally ineffective hoping E U will rescue Twitter (and TSLA).
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Was Trump whitehouse asking to remove tweets legal or is it against 1st amendment?So it turns out it wasn’t only the Biden campaign who were pressuring Twitter before the election, it was Democratic Senate and House lawmakers, who, of course, had majorities and ran various investigative committees.
I'm not sure if there's any case law on this. Presumably they felt the tweets were in violation of Twitter's policies. I don't see a problem with federal government employees doing that. I'm sure the CDC flagged tons of stuff they thought was COVID misinformation for example. Obviously if there are threats of retribution then that could be first amendment issue (IMO, not a constitutional lawyer!).
Excellent summary, and thanx for the "feel free to add to this" part...Trying to reel this back to at least somewhat-twitter-related.
I'd honestly like to understand what Elon's actual plans for 'free speech' on twitter are. not the completely nonsense free-speech absolutist crap. The actual stuff he's really implementing.
Misinformation - is it allowed or not? Seems to be yes.... except if it leans the wrong way
Hate speech - mixed bag - some long proven haters being reinstated as others are banned
Porn - again unclear - our big news drop seems to boil down to Elon being mad some dick-pics were suppressed
Scams - I dunno but I think catfishing and lying are not against the law - does Twitter 2.0 care about this dimension?
Impersonation - apparently no, especially if it annoys the boss
Drugs - haven't seen much on this. Weed is legal in some regions... will be interesting to see what "free speech" in Twitter has on it
Feel free to add to this. This is what actual moderation looks like - almost nothing up above is against Federal Law or being banned by the US government, it's more about what's appropriate on a social platform. It is messy and complicated and involves a lot of restrictions on things that are not illegal.
Who is using who ?!I mean it’s really a brilliant way to get crazy uncle charley (apologies to charlies everywhere) to become a huge defender of the largest EV / battery / solar industrialist the world has ever seen at the holiday dinner table.
Excellent summary, and thanx for the "feel free to add to this" part...
Musk intimated that, in response to the European Union (remember that EU is larger than the US),
Twitter would adopt their regulatory framework about hate speech and misinformation, via promising
a "stress test" early next year. And also "raising the ante" by having EU regs apply to US Twitter,
because maintaining two separate versions of moderation/privacy etc. would be more costly.
From a marketing perspective, it's not enough to just comply with each country's laws, individually,
because if you are just complying with law, you've already failed because you will lose advertisers
who have other sensitivities as has been already noticed.
Oh yeah, about Elon's actual plans? He mentioned individual users being able to "turn a knob",
where one end of the filter is tuning into a Disney/Apple level safe-for-work thing, and at the other end
dialing a "nasty-as-you-wanna-be" level, where I guess testosterone rules, at least for your personal Twitter
news feed and targeted advertising. I can imagine he wants neural nets to regulate these settings.
Good luck with that!
P.S. Even if the latter were possible without potentially costly human intervention for moderation,
the societal costs of having an unfettered setting for the low-brow (the "deplorables")
demographics may just be too much.
Indeed, Musk seems schizoid about this. He may be doing that "fail fast and learn fast" thing, vis-a-vis the IBM note below. Or, he may be trying some bizarre experiment where he wants to gather more hate speech as input to someThis seems to run directly opposite of him claiming general amnesty for those who violated hate speech rules, and reinstating assorted personalities including several Nazi-friendly folks who would be in clear violation of EU standards.
This thread "sounds good" but is in total conflict with Elon's original mantra of free-speech-absolutism, and also doesn't match his actions vs EU law.
I still see NO actual well thought out plan. Do you?
As predicted everyone got their golden parachutes. Musk still hasn’t found a legal team hardcore enough.
Just avoid this thread if it's not up to the echo chamber level you're comfortable with. That's what I do when I start to find it unsettling.So many posts here sounds like TSLAQ when they attack whatever Elon is doing nowadays. Not only for what he does with twitter, but also for how he sounds on Tesla presentations. Not sure what's going on, this forum used to be a goldmine of information, suddenly I find myself wondering if there are some long term disinformation game going on.
I get it, maybe I am just a naïve fanboy, maybe it's just me being delusional not seeing Elon for what he really is. But that's what TSLAQ was telling me all those years, and clearly I was better than them at predicting the future, so when I hear similar sounding arguments I don't get convinced by them.
I sometimes wonder how it would be if a singularity was happening. Max Tegmark describes in his Omega story:
This seems not too unlike what I see how, strangely opinions are changing very rapidly and groups that used to support something is now against it. Are we just pieces on the chess board being played by some much more intelligent entity? :-/
First TSLAQ took over the Autopilot subforum, now they are taking over the offtopic threads, soon they will take over the roundtable thread and what will be left then?Just avoid this thread if it's not up to the echo chamber level you're comfortable with. That's what I do when I start to find it unsettling.
There is no way this level of dissension will ever be permitted in the roundtable thread(and that's good, imo). I think it's a healthy blow off valve. Nobody is forcing us to read or comment.First TSLAQ took over the Autopilot subforum, now they are taking over the offtopic threads, soon they will take over the roundtable thread and what will be left then?![]()
This seems to run directly opposite of him claiming general amnesty for those who violated hate speech rules…
It’s serious business when a nutty actor gets his tweeted photo of the president’s son engaged in a kinky sex act yanked from a private platform! The future of the republic is at stake! Thank god he’s going to sue. someone. for something.Everyone here understands that we had a president try to overturn our election and ruin democracy (and still has not paid for that) and yet, not one single time did Elon make a fuss about it.....yet he's so mad about the laptop info that justice must be served! Hahahaha.
Was Trump whitehouse asking to remove tweets legal or is it against 1st amendment?
Note from the text you quote he only said those that violate "incitement to violence" rules, not hate speech rules in general, "will result in account suspension" (implying this only applies to actions after the amnesty). If that rule applied to posts before, there are plenty of people he recently reinstated that would fall under that criteria and shouldn't be reinstated.Elon has never said nor implied that there would be amnesty for those who violated hate speech rules. He did say all banned accounts would be reinstated but later added this:
What tweets were they asking to remove?
If you read the thread, their direct request was that the Press Secretary's account be reinstated (it was suspended for linking the laptop story).
I'm not seeing anything that confirms a request by the administration to remove a tweet (unlike what was published regarding the "other side").