DarkandStormy
Active Member
Any employment attorneys here?
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Any employment attorneys here?
No, but I've never heard of a company not just giving 60 days of pay. I don't think Twitter needs any more bad press.
Any employment attorneys here?
I have to admit, my expectations were not when Elon took over Twitter a week ago, but even by those low standards his first week has been a disaster.
He's getting ridiculed in the marketplace of ideas, losing advertisers, and ranting about a vague "they" violating free speech, potentially violating the WARN Act in California, negotiating in real time with celebs for Twitter Blue, pulling staff from Tesla to work on the tire fire that is Twitter....
He probably figures all he’s been getting is bad press anyway so might as well get it out of the way and do what must be done.No, but I've never heard of a company not just giving 60 days of pay. I don't think Twitter needs any more bad press.
Elon thinks an exercise of free speech (people voicing opinions to advertisers) is a violation of free speech.
I'm not sure he could pass a Civics 101 class.
EDIT - who is "they?" Very easy to play the victim when you can't define whoever is supposedly trying to suppress your speech.
Exactly. He rails on pull back of free speech in the same rant about advertisers leaving. Which is it? What has basically happened is he showed true colors. What he likes to be tweeted on Twitter he doesnt want to see moderated. He doesnt want himself to be moderated.The problem is that Elon has been quite bad at communicating this and what the $8 charge is about. Many don't think you can still tweet for free.
Oh so he planned this all out ? LolHe probably figures all he’s been getting is bad press anyway so might as well get it out of the way and do what must be done.
WARN is a Federal law, not a Cali law.
California has its own version. (of course it does)
Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification (WARN)
California employers can find an overview of the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification (WARN) Act including, how to file a WARN Notice and what steps are taken after a WARN notice has been filed.edd.ca.gov
I never wanted this distraction to take place. As much as many supporters think Twitter is never going to make a ton of $. Human nature will just not allow it.I have to admit, my expectations were not when Elon took over Twitter a week ago, but even by those low standards his first week has been a disaster.
He's getting ridiculed in the marketplace of ideas, losing advertisers, and ranting about a vague "they" violating free speech, potentially violating the WARN Act in California, negotiating in real time with celebs for Twitter Blue, pulling staff from Tesla to work on the tire fire that is Twitter....
What's the breakdown? Genuinely asking.Yes, it does, but Twitter has employees in multiple locations outside of Cali.
California has its own version. (of course it does)
Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification (WARN)
California employers can find an overview of the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification (WARN) Act including, how to file a WARN Notice and what steps are taken after a WARN notice has been filed.edd.ca.gov
btw: Methinks Elon could have saved some angst (adn legal money) by having a All-Hands call last Friday morning with the total company, saying "welcome, I look forward to meeting you, adn expect everyone in the office Monday morning 8:00 am sharp, and after that, 5 days/week"
Hundreds would have quit on the spot.
Yeah, but he wanted 1000s on the spot. The cutting of staff abruptly does appear to be rather desperate. Think it kind of shows he knows that this deal is monetarily just a disaster and is looking any way he can to make it work.
As for the WARN act do we even know if the 60 day notice wasnt given or is that all speculation? See I can support Elon. I support him in many ways. Just this stuff if batshit crazy.
Agreed. I am not sure how he planned to add value to Twitter. I thought there was some magic he had up his sleeve.Exactly. He rails on pull back of free speech in the same rant about advertisers leaving. Which is it? What has basically happened is he showed true colors. What he likes to be tweeted on Twitter he doesnt want to see moderated. He doesnt want himself to be moderated.
The $8 charge I really dont care about. The rollout was just plain awful.
Except the Pelosi conspiracy theory stuff that he retweeted isn't from the 80% in the middle, it's the part of the 20% of the batshit crazy crowd.From Elon's interview, from main thread:
I actually don't think so. People would quiet quit so they can get the severance.California has its own version. (of course it does)
Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification (WARN)
California employers can find an overview of the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification (WARN) Act including, how to file a WARN Notice and what steps are taken after a WARN notice has been filed.edd.ca.gov
btw: Methinks Elon could have saved some angst (adn legal money) by having a All-Hands call last Friday morning with the total company, saying "welcome, I look forward to meeting you, adn expect everyone in the office Monday morning 8:00 am sharp, and after that, 5 days/week"
Hundreds would have quit on the spot.
I don't think it requires 60 days of notice does it? Isn't it fine if you are informed and escorted out of the building on the same day, as long as you are paid for at least 60 days?Yeah, but he wanted 1000s on the spot. The cutting of staff abruptly does appear to be rather desperate. Think it kind of shows he knows that this deal is monetarily just a disaster and is looking any way he can to make it work.
As for the WARN act do we even know if the 60 day notice wasnt given or is that all speculation? See I can support Elon. I support him in many ways. Just this stuff if batshit crazy.
Your point? I said he wanted the people to resign in the 1000s on day 1. The cutting of 75% I see as rather desperate to help make this thing financially not a disaster. It is always better for people to resign then get laid off. No unemployment, no severance, no warn act, etc. etc.Please. We've known since well before the purchase he was going to cut staff. The number circulating for months was 75%.
Except the Pelosi conspiracy crowd that he retweeted isn't the 80% in the middle, it's the part of the 20% of the batshit crazy crowd.
I actually don't think so. People would quiet quit so they can get the severance.
I don't think it requires 60 days of notice does it? Isn't it fine if you are informed and escorted out of the building on the same day, as long as you are paid for at least 60 days?