-
Want to remove ads? Register an account and login to see fewer ads, and become a Supporting Member to remove almost all ads.
EPA display
- Thread starter Romain Garin
- Start date
Rated vs Ideal
Remember you're using rating instead of ideal range at 100% State of Charge.
Pic is my 2012 P85 with new (Oct 2022 build) replacement Tesla pack. Shows rated vs ideal. Pic represents 90 kWh pack corked to 85 kWh @90% SoC. I keep mine at rated.
Remember you're using rating instead of ideal range at 100% State of Charge.
Pic is my 2012 P85 with new (Oct 2022 build) replacement Tesla pack. Shows rated vs ideal. Pic represents 90 kWh pack corked to 85 kWh @90% SoC. I keep mine at rated.
Last edited:
Since the location of @Romain Garin says "Brittany", I am thinking that is European settings, so I should help clarify about the mixed up meaning of the term "Rated", which is different between the two locations.
In North America cars, it is as @NV Ray says, where "Ideal" is a much higher optimistic listing of distance on the display. No one uses "Ideal", because it's such a fantasy. "Rated" is the more realistic lower number.
In the European cars, they have that WLTP rating agency, I think? Their car efficiency ratings are crazy optimistic. So their number called "Rated" is the fantasy high number. Their lower realistic one is called "Typical" and basically corresponds to our American "Rated" number.
In North America cars, it is as @NV Ray says, where "Ideal" is a much higher optimistic listing of distance on the display. No one uses "Ideal", because it's such a fantasy. "Rated" is the more realistic lower number.
In the European cars, they have that WLTP rating agency, I think? Their car efficiency ratings are crazy optimistic. So their number called "Rated" is the fantasy high number. Their lower realistic one is called "Typical" and basically corresponds to our American "Rated" number.
Thanks for your replies.
WLTP is not much realistic...EPA is the one we stick to.
Despite Tesla sells his vehicles here in Europe in WLTP it's noticeable that on our cars it's EPA range (in km of course) and not WLTP which is displayed on screens, confusing a lot of people here!
I own two Tesla, a model 3 RWD 2023 (since may 31 2023) and a 2018 TMS 100D (Since one a half month).
My consumptions (cool driving and some fun accelerations from time to time
)
Model 3 => 16517mi driven & 20,6kWh/100mi
TMS => 1243mi driven so far & 26,5 kWh/1000mi
A bit under EPA range...
WLTP is not much realistic...EPA is the one we stick to.
Despite Tesla sells his vehicles here in Europe in WLTP it's noticeable that on our cars it's EPA range (in km of course) and not WLTP which is displayed on screens, confusing a lot of people here!
I own two Tesla, a model 3 RWD 2023 (since may 31 2023) and a 2018 TMS 100D (Since one a half month).
My consumptions (cool driving and some fun accelerations from time to time
)Model 3 => 16517mi driven & 20,6kWh/100mi
TMS => 1243mi driven so far & 26,5 kWh/1000mi
A bit under EPA range...
I have another question about the 2018 100D TMS, do someone know exactly what was nominal full capacity when new?
It's very hard to grab some infos...I think it's a BTX6 battery but what are the numbers of this full capacity when new (and buffer too).
Is 102kWh, 97,6 or else?
so much conflicting information...
It's very hard to grab some infos...I think it's a BTX6 battery but what are the numbers of this full capacity when new (and buffer too).
Is 102kWh, 97,6 or else?
so much conflicting information...
Similar threads
