Fake news for shizzle

[insaneoctane]

Nauseating what makes electrons these days....

Tesla Model 3 Allegedly Suffers A Year Delay With No Rebates!

 

[Runt8]

Literally every other word in that article is complete bulls**t...

 

[jelloslug]

Don't link this crap. We don't need anymore clicks for this nonsense.

 

[jonnyg]

Article text to avoid more clicks:

Tesla has said before that they are hoping to deliver the first batch of Model 3s before the year ends but this is now looking unlikely to happen. New reports have surfaced online and they are all claiming that the Model 3 is delayed for a year.

The word is that Tesla is struggling in trying to produce the Model 3 in bulk. Parts can get very limited and having 300,000 pre-orders makes it a lot tougher for Tesla.

If news of the delay is true, then the earliest possible date for the Model 3’s debut is towards the end of 2018 next year. This would mean two things. The first is that those that pre-ordered the car will have to wait longer and secondly, they are required to pay more for it.

The Model 3 is targeted to retail right under the $40,000 following rebates and this will change if the delay is true. Come 2018, Tesla will lose out on the rebates program and this will force prices for the Model 3 to spike.

 

[boaterva]

OMG, what was that published in? I don't even recognize the name even looking at the link... what a pile of steaming... is there one fact correct?

 

[BluestarE3]

Literally every other word in that article is complete bulls**t...

Yes, literally!

As others have pointed out above, it's clickbait, so for anyone curious about the content, just read the transcript above rather than going to their site.

 

[strykeroz]

So many weasle words...alledgedly, the-word-is, reports online suggest...CITATION NEEDED

 

[BluestarE3]

OMG, what was that published in? I don't even recognize the name even looking at the link... what a pile of steaming... is there one fact correct?

They spelled "Tesla" and "Model 3" correctly?

 

[shrspeedblade]

Sight is clearly against/trying to sabotage Tesla. You can have a negative view but still be honest, this site doesn't even bother. Don't waste you time if you haven't already.

 

[smak]

Funny thing is, the online report he's siting, is his.

Because it's literally the only place online that says this.

 

[cheekedave]

"...to retail right under the $40,000 following rebates"..

Um, I am not mathematician but I am pretty sure 35,000 is not right under. Plus I believe the English is less than average.

 

[SMSMD]

Article text to avoid more clicks:

Great idea..one click avoided

 

[S'toon]

 

[arjay]

Great idea..one click avoided

Too late, I clicked and commented...now I must do penance and spam that mother.

 

[insaneoctane]

Yeah, when I posted it I was in shock! Now I wish I could change my original message like JonnyG did so folks wouldn't accidentally feed the beast!

 

[Garlan Garner]

Yeah, when I posted it I was in shock! Now I wish I could change my original message like JonnyG did so folks wouldn't accidentally feed the beast!

Do you work for Toyota or Ford or GM?

You've only posted something 55 times in the past 15 months.......and you start this thread?

 

[insaneoctane]

Do you work for Toyota or Ford or GM?

You've only posted something 55 times in the past 15 months.......and you start this thread?

I don't know if that is humor or a genuine accusation?

 

[BluestarE3]

Yeah, when I posted it I was in shock! Now I wish I could change my original message like JonnyG did so folks wouldn't accidentally feed the beast!

If you want to avoid having additional readers clicking on that link, just click the REPORT button on the first post and ask a moderator to remove the link to that article and replace it with a reference to post #4 which contains a transcript of that article.

 

[insaneoctane]

If you want to avoid having additional readers clicking on that link, just click the REPORT button on the first post and ask a moderator to remove the link to that article and replace it with a reference to post #4 which contains a transcript of that article.

Good suggestion, I just did that.