Sleep mode in 5.6 is same as 5.0...and the vampire loss will be the same.I agree with this post. I have 5.0 as well.
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Sleep mode in 5.6 is same as 5.0...and the vampire loss will be the same.I agree with this post. I have 5.0 as well.
Sleep mode in 5.6 is same as 5.0...and the vampire loss will be the same.
Just say'n it's different than being reported.
I've been long forgotten in this update cycle Please be kind, random_vin_generator...
Finally. I am a happy camper. Less battery drain (to be witnessed). maps oriented in direction of travel. next/previous buttons change presets. Just need reverse lines in camera and I think i'll stop updating
With the new algorithms for calculating remaining range, the energy use required to get rated range seems to have dropped.
Previously, if my 30 mile average was at about 306 w/mile, my projected range = my rated range. Now with 5.6, that number is somewhere around 294 w/mile.
Sleep mode is not working for me. MS lost 11 miles last night. I know sleep mode is enabled as the car executes the wake up process when I leave in the morning. Maybe the cold temps at night? MS is plugged in but not charging. 5.6 installed 60Kwh VIN 4000.
Agree key fob first check… Also, I suspect if someone is monitoring using REST API, it would disturb sleep.
Here's another hypothesis to explain wide variation of perceived overnight loss: we know that part of 5.6 is a refined projected range calculation. let's assume that this now factors in temperature. So, all things being equal, someone who puts to sleep and wakes up in similar environment will see almost no loss in rated range - but someone who puts to sleep in early evening warmth, and wakes up in early morning cold will see lower rated range. I have not checked addresses of all of the posters on this topic to see if the data points match climate, and I have no idea if temperature (either via thermometer or GPS location) is factored into range calc. But this could explain lower AM projected range even if battery is untaxed all night...
PS: I got 5.6 yesterday and will not be a data point because I have sleep mode off and will only turn it on if/when I need it for extra range. For me, <40 cents per day is well spent having car immediately responsive.
Is it possible that newer cars are sleeping better (I.e. losing fewer miles over the same period) than older models? I haven't thoroughly reviewed all the random data points we have here, but I do seem to see a trend in that those reporting > 2-3 miles lost in 24 hours have older cars with lower VINs.