The current draft regulation charging stations hindered investment and innovation in charging technologies for electric vehicles
The European Directive 2014/94 / EU on the construction of infrastructure for alternative fuels has until 18 November 2016 the EU - Member States be implemented. From November 18, 2017, the conditions laid down in the Directive requirements must apply. As one of the first Member States that take steps Germany has submitted to the charging stations Ordinance (LSV) a draft implementing Directive. Tesla Motors welcomed Germany's efforts to play a leading role on this issue and the declared by the Federal Government aimed at bringing up to 2020 one million electric vehicles on German roads. However, we are deeply concerned that the current draft of the LSV is liable to hinder the development of electric mobility. In addition, the design is significantly different from the zugrunde-- this Directive and infringes European and German constitutional law Primär--. For years, Tesla has invested in developing charging technologies for electric vehicles, as well as a Europe-wide integrated network of charging points. The batteries of the Tesla Model S and Tesla Supercharger - network are optimally matched to one another in order to allow a fully electric driving over long distances; they allow a 50% charge within 20 minutes, enough for a distance of over 250 kilometers. In Europe, there are more than 186 so-called Tesla Supercharger - stations and therefore has more than 1020 individual charging points that ensure a fully electric driving from Oslo to Barcelona or from London to Vienna. This means that more than 20 million kilometers throughout Europe driven with 100% renewable energy in JULY and 2015th Including more than 3.7 million kilometers loaded to the 48 Supercharger-- stations in Germany. 60% of the loads derived from foreign customers and demonstrate that cross-border electric mobility is already possible today. This would be without adequate private investment in battery technology and the Supercharger - stations have been impossible. Here is the Supercharger - technology open to others and Tesla remains open to cooperation with other companies to use the Supercharger - network. If the LSV is implemented in its current form, however, operators of charging points 'also in privately financed and privately-held as the Tesla' would be forced to invest in additional connections at all new charging points and all other electric cars to grant access to the Superchargers , This not only hinders the expansion of the charging infrastructure in general, but also leads to a limitation of the necessary free space for private investment in innovative technologies and business models for charging services. x The LSV requires the establishment of type 2-- or Combo 2 - terminals and in future a third party access for all ͣƂĨĨĞŶƚůŝĐŚ njƵŐćŶŐůŝĐŚĞŶ͞> ĂĚĞƉƵŶŬƚĞ?. After LSV certainly so on the basis of accessibility in the spatial sense. After that would hardly be a loading point in Germany to be regarded as private charging point, even if it is privately funded 100% to 100% is privately owned and located on privately owned land. This also the EU - Commission recognized in its opinion on the LSV and speaks of obvious contradictions related to pe ?? ĞŐƌŝĨĨ ͣƂĨĨĞŶƚůŝĐŚ njƵŐćŶŐůŝĐŚ͞; Apparent inconsistenĐŝĞƐ ƌĞůĂƚĞĚ ƚŽ ƚŚĞ ĐŽŶĐĞƉƚ Zi Accessible to the ƉƵďůŝĐ͛͞Ϳ???????? , According to the Commission, the definition of publicly available charging point according to the LSV would imply that there are no privately accessible charging points [...], ie that all charging points are available to the public ultimately (ͣǁŽƵůĚ?ŝŵƉůLJ?ƚŚĂƚ?ƚŚĞƌĞ?ĂƌĞ?ŶŽ?ƉƌŝǀĂƚĞůLJ?ĂĐĐĞƐƐŝďůĞ?ƌĞĐŚĂƌŐŝŶŐ?ƉŽŝŶƚƐ?͙?ŝ͘Ğ͘? That ultimaƚĞůLJ?Ăůů?ƌĞĐŚĂƌŐŝŶŐ?ƉŽŝŶƚƐ?ĂƌĞ?ƉƵďůŝĐůLJ?ĂĐĐĞƐƐŝďůĞ͟Ϳ. According to the Directive, however, a charging point is available to the public if it functionally EU for all - users njƵŐćŶŐůŝĐŚ?ŝƐƚ͗?ͣĞŝŶ?>ĂĚĞƉƵŶŬƚ?ŽĚĞƌ?ĞŝŶĞ?dĂŶŬƐƚĞůůĞ͕?ĂŶ?ĚĞƌ?ĞŝŶ?ĂůƚĞƌŶĂƚŝǀĞƌ?<ƌĂĨƚƐƚŽĨĨ?angeboten and is njƵ?ĚĞƌ?ĂůůĞ?EƵƚnjĞƌ?ĂƵƐ?ĚĞƌ?hŶŝŽŶ?ŶŝĐŚƚĚŝƐŬƌŝŵŝŶŝĞƌĞŶĚ??ƵŐĂŶŐ?ŚĂďĞŶ͞?;?ƌƚ͘?Ϯ͘ϱ the Directive). These charging points are to ensure technical compatibility and non-discriminatory access for all users. However, the Directive does not provide any comparable obligations for public
accessible before charging points so as not to be private investment in innovative technologies and business models in the way. As the United Kingdom and Finland require in their recently the Commission sent statements, the LSV should take to ensure their compatibility with the Directive laid down in the Directive definition of public accessibility.
x Furthermore, the amounts laid down in the LSV transition period for compliance with these requirements, three months after the entry into force thereof. Such a period, however, would make the adaptations to be carried out by the industry extremely complex and costly (a production change takes after rough estimate for at least 24 months to complete). This could lead to an immediate termination of successful requests initiated initiatives. This may not be in the interest of German expansion targets for e - mobility are; the EU - Commission has emphasized in its observations on the LSV that the period until 18 November 2017 is a transition period that allows the relevant economic operators, to matters arising from the Directive sĞƌƉĨůŝĐŚƚƵŶŐĞŶ ĞŝŶnjƵƐƚĞůůĞŶ; The period until? 18 November 2017 is a transition period Allowing the CORRESPONDING economic operators to adapt to the obligations derived from Directive 2014/94 / EU͟Ϳ͘? The obligation to transpose the LSV should therefore apply only after the conditions laid down by the directive appropriate transitional period 'namely from November 2017 ( as the Commission confirmed in its observations on the LSV). x According to the directive, the agreed commitment to the standards of the type 2-- 2-- and Combo ports should not adversely affect existing investments in the expansion of other standard technologies for charging points affect (recital no. 33). Even if existing charging points would not be affected by the LSV, the LSV would already jeopardize planned investments of Tesla and other companies in Germany and thus also to an end of the expansion of Supercharger - lead network in Germany. The LSV should reflect the relevant clear statement of intent of the Directive. apart from the non-observance of the underlying EU - - Policy - x Finally, the LSV violates EU - primary law, especially against the entrepreneurial freedom, property rights, freedom to provide services and free movement of goods, as well as to German constitutional law, ie. to Art. 80 para. 1 GG (issuance of regulations), Art. 12 GG (freedom of enterprise) and Art. 14 of the Basic Law in conjunction with Art. 19 para. 3 (corporate ownership).
Tesla understood the objective of standardization of charging points in Europe. Since the electric mobility but is still in its early stages, it requires a balanced development between standardization and innovation in order to create more incentives for private investment in better products and services. This achieves a higher market acceptance and a more sustainable mobility. Tesla is therefore of the opinion that the applicability of that in the LSV technical obligations on private networks of charging points and the shortened transition period the previously well-functioning initiatives seriously damage and thus possible further investments with high additional costs would burden. This would result in a significant delay of progress in the German E-- mobility industry. Tesla is convinced that Germany of all EU - Member States is best suited to become the leading market for e - ascend mobility in Europe and a pioneer in the establishment of necessary standards. However, this objective can not be realized by the current LSV, are hampered by the innovations in the important area of the charging infrastructure. Best regards,
Jelle Vastert Lead EU Supercharger Program