It seems that unparalleled access to the company has lead to unparalleled expectations that voices will be listened too. Kudos to TM for allowing the access and kudos to all of you for providing feedback. TM has probably missed a step in that when you ask for feedback you need to respond once you get it - by respond I don't necessarily mean change design, but certainly communicate back, be it publicly or privately.
It is ironic - if we were posting design comments on a forum for a new model of BMW or MB, do we really think they'd listen anywhere near as much as Tesla has for a number of things? Perhaps if one us bought 10,000/yr. for a corporate fleet, otherwise probably not.
I happen to like the Beta interior. After reading all the hubub of the last few days I went on many websites - BMW, MB, Audi, Lexus, Acura, Infiniti, Jaguar, Aston Martin, Maserati, Alfa Romeo, Ferrari - to view interiors. My friends, you have to severely crack $100K to get anything remotely unique. If you took away all badging and stuck me in a BMW, Audi, Lexus, or MB interior, I'd have a hard time differentiating. They are all nice quality, but in my opinion very mainstream, and not great, design - a zillion buttons, center console (I know, don't get you started), etc. Everything looks very additive - start with a door, add a handle (two actually, one that unlatches things and a big fat one to pull,) add a pocket for stuff, add a few mirror and window controls, add a change holder, add a speaker or two, use six materials in 2 s.f. - after viewing them all, I pulled back and thought they looked quite clunky. And the dashboards - please go on a diet! But they are safe designs, we are all used to them. Heck, I own a 5-series Bimmer so I am not a disbeliever. Aston Martin and Ferrari were distinguished by just being prettier designs, but still I'd argue additive in nature and less unique than Tesla. I know unique doesn't necessarily = good, and I may be way off on this, but I think in 2-3 years you will see all these other manufacturers migrate towards Tesla's approach - simpler, flowing surfaces that become functional or define functional areas. The touchscreen and voice are the future, so less simply stuff is the result. I am all in.
Look, we're all creatures of habit, and I agree we shouldn't compromise safety for looks - digging in the glove box for sunglasses at 65 MPH = no good. So a future add-in console may serve many of you well, and I hope Tesla makes a beautiful, functional, flowing one. But give yourself a few months to try what's there and reconsider. I bet most of you don't walk down the street with a center console under your arm so it's easy to get to your sunglasses, chapstick, change, dried up pen, and a dry-cleaning receipt. Try to meet the car where it is and see if you like the simpler results.
I'm an architect and at our firm we try very hard to marry performance and design so they are inextricably wed - they are the same thing if we have really succeeded. I like to challenge my teams w/a mantra of 'fewer, simple, bolder moves' when we design. Look at the interiors of all the competitors (especially if stay under $100K). I think you'll see when they decided they needed something new, they added it. 'More, messier, weaker moves' in my opinion. I'm happy if Tesla doesn't add anything to the design except quality materials and workmanship.
Tesla isn't perfect - it never will be. But it's headed in the right direction on many fronts - that's why we're all fans. Even the interior.
Keep providing feedback - I'd love the X and the next gen. S to be even better than what we're all about to buy. Can't wait!
Cattledog