TMC is an independent, primarily volunteer organization that relies on ad revenue to cover its operating costs. Please consider whitelisting TMC on your ad blocker and becoming a Supporting Member. For more info: Support TMC

Is Tesla set for a massive expense with autonomous failures?

Discussion in 'Model 3' started by Nuclear Fusion, May 25, 2018.

  1. Nuclear Fusion

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2016
    Messages:
    638
    Location:
    Your mum
    Following on from the Model 3 crash & considering autopilot fails with fixed objects which is a pretty rudimentary ‘obstacle’, what if after 1 million+ Model S3XY cars are on the road Tesla say “sorry, but we can’t offer full self driving”?
    What would be the cost of retrofitting 1 million+ cars for FSD?
     
    • Like x 1
    • Disagree x 1
  2. diplomat33

    diplomat33 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2017
    Messages:
    636
    Location:
    Terre Haute, IN USA
    Depending on what the retrofit is, it could be potentially be very expensive of course.

    But I don't think it is a big problem.

    1) Tesla has already committed to upgrading the CPU's should regulators require it for FSD. So, I am sure Tesla has already looked at what that would cost.

    2) Not braking for fixed objects can be fixed with a software patch and won't require any hardware upgrades at all. Tesla just needs the software to get the cameras to recognize fixed objects and brake instead of relying on the radar. This is something that FSD will do of course. So, this is a problem that should be fixable without needing any hardware upgrades at all.
     
    • Informative x 1
  3. ewoodrick

    ewoodrick Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2018
    Messages:
    1,045
    Location:
    Buford, GA
    What you see today isn't full autopilot. There's really little auto in it, hence the requirement that drivers are required to stay vigilant when driving the cars. And the statement "when driving the cars" is important, because drivers do drive the cars today.

    Full autopilot is not in the car today and will require upgrades, supposedly software and the answer to the question is easy. It won't cost anything.

    Of course your question is pretty dubious, slight reworded, "How much will it cost to provide full AutoPilot when it can't be implemented"
     
    • Like x 1
  4. Nuclear Fusion

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2016
    Messages:
    638
    Location:
    Your mum
    That is assuming the CPU is the only upgrade required.

    What about if another camera is required? What about if they decide LIDAR is required?
    Ridiculously expensive, borderline full refund.
     
  5. d21mike

    d21mike Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2017
    Messages:
    782
    Location:
    Torrance, CA 90503
    I assume they could refund $300 to each person that bought it. Not everyone bought it
     
  6. Kanting

    Kanting Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2016
    Messages:
    418
    Location:
    US
    To at least meet the claim that the cars are all equipped with FSD hardware, open the platform, and give the FSD money to whoever wins the FSD coding contest.
     
    • Like x 1
  7. TT97

    TT97 Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2017
    Messages:
    1,224
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    Mobileye (which I'm sure many Tesla owners will remember) has been testing FSD in Jerusalem. They seem to be well ahead of Tesla, but more importantly, they are doing it all with just cameras (no LIDAR). They probably have the same equipment that is currently on the 3.

    A lap of Jerusalem in Intel's surprisingly aggressive self-driving car

    I think the hardware on the 3 is sufficient and in likelihood would just upgrade the CPU to process all the information needed (although I wouldn't mind if they can also add V2V and V2I).
     
    • Informative x 1
  8. diplomat33

    diplomat33 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2017
    Messages:
    636
    Location:
    Terre Haute, IN USA
    I maintain that another camera or LIDAR are not needed. The car already has full coverage with 8 cameras, why would it need another one? And in terms of LIDAR, I know it is controversial, but I don't think it is needed either, at least not from a technical point of view. MobilEye has achieved FSD without LIDAR so it is doable. LIDAR is just another form of radar. It's not some magical "FSD tech". You can use radar and ultrasonics with really good camera vision instead of LIDAR.

    Now, it is possible that government regulators might require LIDAR even though it is not technically necessary but that has not happened yet. Let's wait and see. There is no point in assuming that they will demand it and therefore writing off Tesla's FSD before we've even seen the product.
     
  9. malcolm

    malcolm Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2006
    Messages:
    2,833
    Yeah, but Mobileye are going to put them in anyway:

    Source: linked above by @TT97
     
    • Informative x 1
  10. tescroft

    tescroft In Musk, we trust.

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2015
    Messages:
    187
    Location:
    Switzerland
    Just to remember: Elon Musk on Twitter

    Tom Randall on 24th of january 2017: "At what point will "Full Self-Driving Capability" features noticeably depart from "Enhanced Autopilot" features?"
    Elon Musk: "3 months maybe, 6 months definitely"
     
    • Funny x 5
  11. davidc18

    davidc18 Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2015
    Messages:
    1,666
    Location:
    Ft. Lauderdale
    I think the real issue is that Tesla has done a terrible job of explaining what "autopilot" is and is not. They have also oversold (over promised) what the system can do and they have created a lot of confusion about the system. I have found that most Tesla employees don't understand the system (and its limitations) so how can they hope to explain it correctly to new owners???

    I believe this is not a "hardware" issue as much as a "training" issue.

    This is based on almost 80,000 miles of AP 1.0 use between the 3 MSs I have owned.

    ps. I really hope that someday they actually deliver on all of their promises.
     
    • Like x 4
  12. postpast

    postpast Member

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2015
    Messages:
    144
    Location:
    Toronto
    They just won't say that they can't offer full self-driving. Even if in five years all new Tesla's, new Chevy's and most new cars offer full self-driving; Tesla can just say that full self-driving is still possible on ap2 cars and they are working on the software to make it happen. There will be some lawsuits, but Tesla has never said that FSD will be available in any amount of time. Eventually, the amount of ap2 cars will dwindle due to age or breakthroughs will make it cost effective enough, and Tesla will do it.
     
  13. gregd

    gregd Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2014
    Messages:
    1,950
    Location:
    CM98
    Wouldn't LIDAR solve the problem of running into barriers (concrete walls, fire trucks, etc) being reported? I thought the base issue was that RADAR is prevented from noticing anything stationary because it can't tell where exactly the things are (e.g. elevation off the roadway). Too much stationary clutter that prevents it from determining what's there. LIDAR creates a real 3-D image of the surrounding area, and presumably should be able to notice that the road doesn't pass through that solid thing. Can RADAR do that? If so, why isn't it?
     
    • Like x 2
  14. ItsNotAboutTheMoney

    ItsNotAboutTheMoney Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2012
    Messages:
    7,249
    Location:
    Maine
    If Tesla's successful in making their Autopilot system autonomous, they aren't going to care if they need to retrofit, because the increase in revenue will more than cover the retrofits.
     
    • Funny x 2
  15. diplomat33

    diplomat33 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2017
    Messages:
    636
    Location:
    Terre Haute, IN USA
    Yes, LIDAR would solve the problem. But good camera vision algorithms would also solve the problem of running into barriers too. And camera vision is a heck of a lot cheaper.
     
    • Like x 1
  16. kengchang

    kengchang Member

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2017
    Messages:
    841
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    Way ahead in running red light Mobileye autonomous vehicle runs red light in Jerusalem
     
  17. TT97

    TT97 Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2017
    Messages:
    1,224
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    • Funny x 1
  18. mhan00

    mhan00 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2014
    Messages:
    657
    Location:
    Southern California
    They’ll be fine. I’m guessing the vast majority of customers haven’t opted for FSD, so the only retrofits/replacements/refunds Tesla would have to offer would be to those. The others Tesla could just raise the price of FSD to cover their costs. But it certainly wouldn’t be great from a PR perspective.
     
    • Like x 1
  19. Runt8

    Runt8 Active Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2017
    Messages:
    1,393
    Location:
    Colorado
    Intel’s Mobileye wants to dominate driverless cars—but there’s a problem

    Mobileye’s approach is pretty sketchy...
     

Share This Page

  • About Us

    Formed in 2006, Tesla Motors Club (TMC) was the first independent online Tesla community. Today it remains the largest and most dynamic community of Tesla enthusiasts. Learn more.
  • Do you value your experience at TMC? Consider becoming a Supporting Member of Tesla Motors Club. As a thank you for your contribution, you'll get nearly no ads in the Community and Groups sections. Additional perks are available depending on the level of contribution. Please visit the Account Upgrades page for more details.


    SUPPORT TMC