TMC is an independent, primarily volunteer organization that relies on ad revenue to cover its operating costs. Please consider whitelisting TMC on your ad blocker or making a Paypal contribution here: paypal.me/SupportTMC

Leaving it on the charger: wasted watts

Discussion in 'Model S: Battery & Charging' started by wcalvin, Feb 27, 2014.

  1. wcalvin

    wcalvin Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2013
    Messages:
    309
    Location:
    Seattle WA USA
    #1 wcalvin, Feb 27, 2014
    Last edited: Feb 27, 2014
    In trying to figure out what I owe my condo for electricity from the 120 VAC outlet near my parking space, I discovered that you cannot use measures of energy gained by the MS battery with a 85% efficiency factor.

    At the top end of the charging curve, for example, only one-third of the energy ended up in my battery over a 17hr session; the rest was wasted as heat. And that is with limiting current to 5A; at 7A, it is far worse. The charger just spills the excess rather than reducing the draw.

    A Kill-a-Watt power meter inline with the 120 VAC extension cord will do a better job, but even then you must correct for the voltage drop before it gets to the car. If you start charging from the 17" screen and watch the first voltage displayed (when it still says 0A), you will see it drop until amps settles down. The ratio Vo/Vload times the kWh reading on the meter tells you what you are really using by including the heat dissipated in the wiring.

    Anyone worked this out in better detail? Tesla really should document the power throughput for AC charging, to give us better guidance on avoiding wasted watts.
     
  2. FlasherZ

    FlasherZ Sig Model S + Sig Model X + Model 3 Resv

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2012
    Messages:
    7,019
    I don't understand how it's worse at 7A vs. 5A. Tesla's site has the cost to charge based on various outlet types (charging currents), but it's overhead is inversely linear to current - 120V @ 12A is the most expensive because of the higher overhead.

    Do you know the rough number of hours your car was charging? If so, I'd probably just recommend taking the number of hours and calculating the cost based on it. 12A * 120V = 1440W, or 1.44 kW. Each hour on the charger at that rate, then, is 1.44 kWh. If you charge on average 5 hours per day, then 5 * 1.44 = 7.2 kWh, then multiply it times your rate (in my case, .085) to get the cost per day. 7.2 kWh * $0.085 = $0.612 per day or $18.36 for a 30-day month.
     
  3. David99

    David99 Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2014
    Messages:
    2,051
    Location:
    Brea, Orange County
    I guess battery temperature/heating/cooling/cabin climate during charging are all variables that add to the total losses. Just as much as they eat up energy that isn't used to actually drive the car. A 'Kill-a-Watt' unit at the outlet will account for all of it since it just measures what goes through. How much of it ends up in the battery depends on all these things above. I doubt Tesla will make it transparent how much energy is used vs how much ends up available in the battery. Just as much as they don't expose how much power is present at the motor/wheel vs how much is drawn from the battery.
    In the end all that maters is how much you draw from the grid and the Kill-a-Watt should give you a pretty accurate measure as it monitors voltage and amps and time.
     
  4. wcalvin

    wcalvin Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2013
    Messages:
    309
    Location:
    Seattle WA USA
    The energy can go such places. But this is a big 2/3s loss, and it scales up with higher current.
     
  5. FlasherZ

    FlasherZ Sig Model S + Sig Model X + Model 3 Resv

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2012
    Messages:
    7,019
    The setting that you have placed in the car is all-inclusive of pack heating, etc. So if you were to use the total amperage draw that you use and multiply it by the hours, it would work as well, if they will allow you to estimate such.
     
  6. VolkerP

    VolkerP EU Model S P-37

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2011
    Messages:
    2,455
    Location:
    Germany
    Why do you think your condo has to pay for the energy wasted in the line up to the 120V socket at your parking slot? You make the utility meter spin for drawing amps, so you should pay your share of meter rotations.
     
  7. JohnQ

    JohnQ Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2012
    Messages:
    1,585
    Location:
    Redding, CT
    He doesn't think that the condo should pay for the energy loss. He's on a shared meter so can't measure directly and the energy stored in the MS battery would be a significantly low approximation of the energy being used. He wants to pay his fair share.
     
  8. EarlyAdopter

    EarlyAdopter Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2012
    Messages:
    2,497
    Location:
    Redmond, WA
    #8 EarlyAdopter, Feb 28, 2014
    Last edited: Feb 28, 2014
    I took a series of measurements last year on 120v to work out efficiency. You can find all the numbers here:
    Charging rates, current draw, and efficiency data for 120V charging

    At only 5A or 7A 120V as you mention doing, which is only 600W or 840W, your energy use will be dominated by idle load draw (300W) for the car computer systems which all wake up during charging and pack thermal management (anywhere from 0W to 1500W depending on temperature), which will all draw from shore power when plugged in. This leaves close to nothing left to go into your battery.

    You need to bump up to 12A (1500W) if possible to get over that base load draw and start seeing some energy go into the battery.
     
  9. tezco

    tezco Sig P85

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2012
    Messages:
    818
    Location:
    Colorado
    As Flasher mentioned, the Tesla Charge Time and Cost Calculator shows that 120 V charging is the most inefficient and most costly, but the amps are what they are. The Tesla figures seem to match what most of us have observed.
     
  10. AmpedRealtor

    AmpedRealtor Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2013
    Messages:
    4,698
    Location:
    Buckeye, AZ
    The problem is that you are charging at 120v. At 120v, most of the energy is used to maintain the battery temperature rather than storing the current in the battery. Charging efficiencies are much higher at higher current levels, because a much smaller fraction of the total current is being "wasted" for battery maintenance.
     
  11. sms

    sms Member

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2013
    Messages:
    8
    Location:
    Bellevue WA
    Doc: what specialty do you practice?

    What possible pertinence does a M.D.'s specialty have to Tesla information that is going to improve my ownership experience?
     
  12. FlasherZ

    FlasherZ Sig Model S + Sig Model X + Model 3 Resv

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2012
    Messages:
    7,019
    #12 FlasherZ, Mar 1, 2014
    Last edited: Mar 1, 2014
    That's why it's in the "introductions" part of the forum and not this section, which is "battery & charging", until Nigel moves these two posts. :)
     
  13. wcalvin

    wcalvin Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2013
    Messages:
    309
    Location:
    Seattle WA USA
    Minimizing AC draw when charging Tesla Model S

    The object here is to create a recipe for minimizing your (electric bill/emissions) over many recharge cycles. It is not about minimizing time or maximizing range.

    I have shown that topping up is terribly wasteful. Current draw from the wall remains high, even when little arrives in the battery because of the taper.

    What Tesla ought to be giving us is a procedure for minimizing kWh drawn from the wall, and with enough detail that we can adapt it to our useage style. We don't know how they regulate charging or what waste it produces.

    in the meantime, has anyone worked out this problem? (I'd do it myself but I cannot charge faster than 7A on 119VAC no-load because of a 2ohm series resistance that drops the voltage to 105 at the car.)
     
  14. AmpedRealtor

    AmpedRealtor Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2013
    Messages:
    4,698
    Location:
    Buckeye, AZ
    You are drawing an erroneous conclusion from your limited ability to charge at either 5A or 7A. Those are inherently wasteful, low current charging rates that put very little charge into the battery while wasting most of the current on battery heating, cooling, and operating other vehicle systems during charging. As I and others have said, to improve efficiency and reduce overhead, you should charge at 40A or higher.

    Because you charge at 120v, you haven't really shown or proven anything that we don't already know to be true about charging at such low current levels. Get yourself a NEMA 14-50 outlet and you'll greatly reduce your charging overhead. The solution is simple. You're making this far too complicated, and instead, should use the tools available to accomplish your goal - higher amperage charging.
     
  15. montgom626

    montgom626 Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2012
    Messages:
    1,339
    Location:
    USA
    Just plug the MS in whatever plug you have and don't worry about it. :)
     
  16. tezco

    tezco Sig P85

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2012
    Messages:
    818
    Location:
    Colorado
    I set my charge limit to 80% or less and never see a current taper like one sees when approaching 100%. As everyone has said, the best efficiency gain for you would be to find a way to charge at 240V at 20 amps or higher, and stop short of a 100% top-off.
     

Share This Page