Well, this will be interesting...Technically it's the export size of the Powerwalls. IIRC the Tesla Powerwall 2 is still a 5 kW export nameplate so 3x of them is 15,000 of export potential. Added to my 6.7 kWp AC of solar export, PG&E counts my "system size" to be 21.7 kW AC of total energy going onto their infrastructure.
So, they required an extra $1,000 interconnect fee (for NEM2-MT) and that insurance malarkey. I think it's stupid nobody on the NEM 3.0 PD discussion mentions that PG&E already takes a heft up-front fixed cost charge to connect PV+ESS systems under NEM2-MT.
I could call PG&E for an answer but they may or may not give me the correct information. And whatever their answer is they probably won't give it to me in writing.
I currently have the problem that my 2 Powerwall 2's won't reliably start my AC during a power outage (my AC isn't compatible with a SureStart). They want to use load shedding to remove the AC from backup or for me to add a 3rd Powerwall (Series 3) at a discounted price. They told me doing nothing would cause my warranty to be voided. I told them that the contract was for a whole home backup and to go pound sand. I wanted them to replace my 2 Powerwall 2's with Series 3 Powerwalls (I'd accept remanufactured units) and they told me to go pound sand.
Between the grandfathering date going off the original install and the draconian measures being proposed for NEM 3 I told Tesla I would reconsider and opt for the 3rd Powerwall. But if they try to increase their price to cover any additional costs they didn't plan for then I'll be back to telling them to go pound sand.
Does naming PG&E as an insured increase the insurance premium?