You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Curious how they're going to handle charging infrastructure, though.
Money problems seem to be accelerating more swiftly.
I wonder which automaker will buy up the tech.
And then water it down.
Lucid should be concentrating on making the Air safe, reliable, affordable, and provide a high speed DC long distance charging network. Instead they are building a sedan that will cost even more than a loaded X P100D but with no high speed charging network. In my opinion, that is a formula for failure. The market for such a car is tiny. A base S 75D is half the price of the Lucid Air and it is a much more usable car with a proven reliability record, the highest possible safety rating, and the Supercharger network.
Hey if it helps keep the company in business and funds more R&D, sounds like a great business strategy. Always a market for better cars.The people running Lucid are not lucid. The added cost to make an EV go four times as fast as the average speed on an American highway is money wasted. It makes the car much more expensive for the customer.
The people running Lucid are not lucid. The added cost to make an EV go four times as fast as the average speed on an American highway is money wasted. It makes the car much more expensive for the customer. It is an insane thing to do. Lucid should be concentrating on making the Air safe, reliable, affordable, and provide a high speed DC long distance charging network. Instead they are building a sedan that will cost even more than a loaded X P100D but with no high speed charging network. In my opinion, that is a formula for failure. The market for such a car is tiny. A base S 75D is half the price of the Lucid Air and it is a much more usable car with a proven reliability record, the highest possible safety rating, and the Supercharger network.
Yes, I am aware that Tesla started out building a $120,000 tiny sports car that maxed out at 242 miles and had no DC charging. But that was a decade ago. Tesla now has a 10 year head start on Lucid, but Lucid appears to be following the path Tesla pioneered a long time ago. They will never catch up and they won't survive with that strategy.
Why would Lucid spend money to build a supercharger network when they can use a 320kW charging network for free courtesy of VW? See below.
VW is installing ultra-fast 320 kW chargers in California as part of its $2 billion EV infrastructure plan
FYI, Lucid Air starts at $60k before rebates.
400hp, 240 miles, cheaper than a S75
As of now that charging network is not a reality. As @RobStark points out, that charging network plan is flawed and it may never be usable in the way that the Tesla Supercharger network has demonstrated it clearly is.Why would Lucid spend money to build a supercharger network when they can use a 320kW charging network for free courtesy of VW? See below.
VW is installing ultra-fast 320 kW chargers in California as part of its $2 billion EV infrastructure plan
More fantasy. Not reality at this point. And if such a car ever exists it certainly will not go over 200mph, which is what we are discussing here.FYI, Lucid Air starts at $60k before rebates.
400hp, 240 miles, cheaper than a S75
Clear the Air – The $52,500 Lucid Air
The people running Lucid are not lucid. The added cost to make an EV go four times as fast as the average speed on an American highway is money wasted. It makes the car much more expensive for the customer. It is an insane thing to do. Lucid should be concentrating on making the Air safe, reliable, affordable, and provide a high speed DC long distance charging network. Instead they are building a sedan that will cost even more than a loaded X P100D but with no high speed charging network. In my opinion, that is a formula for failure. The market for such a car is tiny. A base S 75D is half the price of the Lucid Air and it is a much more usable car with a proven reliability record, the highest possible safety rating, and the Supercharger network.
Yes, I am aware that Tesla started out building a $120,000 tiny sports car that maxed out at 242 miles and had no DC charging. But that was a decade ago. Tesla now has a 10 year head start on Lucid, but Lucid appears to be following the path Tesla pioneered a long time ago. They will never catch up and they won't survive with that strategy.
Or taller gearing specifically for this stunt?I wonder what the motor/gearing setup is like on that thing to achieve those speeds.
Transmission?
Yeah, I was thinking similar...Or taller gearing specifically for this stunt?
In case people want to drive outside California?Why would Lucid spend money to build a supercharger network when they can use a 320kW charging network for free courtesy of VW? See below.
VW is installing ultra-fast 320 kW chargers in California as part of its $2 billion EV infrastructure plan
You confused Lucid with Faraday Future.
No update was given as to when an agreement between the city of Casa Grande and Lucid would be complete and the project will begin