You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Torque ripple was designed out by that Greek fellow. May still be the most efficient motor design, am I right?
Remember the 4 magnets glued together? it was called _______ I for get.
It was the most efficient Sandy Munro had seen. But things do keep improving.
Slow startup might, just might be to lower impact on the drive train - drive shafts & reduction gears?
Seems quick enough, doesn't it ??
That is a hypothesis.One theory is that it doesn't have torque ripple issues because they limit the torque at lower RPMs to avoid it...
There is no proof that it's not. There is more evidence that it has been.There is no proof that it's completely eliminated.
There is no proof that it's not. There is more evidence that it has been.
At quarter second API intervals the RWD 3 had a linear increase in power at full throttle all the way to the power limits. I take this to mean the torque isn't limited to address torque ripple on the PMSR motor after the first quarter second.One theory is that it doesn't have torque ripple issues because they limit the torque at lower RPMs to avoid it...
At quarter second API intervals the RWD 3 had a linear increase in power at full throttle all the way to the power limits. I take this to mean the torque isn't limited to address torque ripple on the PMSR motor after the first quarter second.
How long does anyone think the torque is held? CANBus logs on a RWD 3 launch would put this to rest.
Back on the topic of the roadster, I can't imagine any setup other than PMSW in front and dual induction in back for range, cost, power and weight.
Dual induction in the rear would be heavier and take up more space than the dual PMSRMs, plus the cooling issues.Back on the topic of the roadster, I can't imagine any setup other than PMSW in front and dual induction in back for range, cost, power and weight.
Engineering Explained was speculating, using outdated motor information.Like engineering explained it can be a combination of both artificial lowering of torque + necessary loweing in the first few km/h. So I guess it's word against word at this point. And throw unaware users with little experience into the mix.
SoylentBrown (on Twitter) had alluded to there being something new or novel about the Plaid drivetrain and that it had something in common with laundry machines. Previously there was speculation that meant it was direct drive (without a gearbox). I don’t have access to his tweets but saw this posted in the main investor round table thread.
Yeah, its not that bad. There are numerous scientific papers published in the literature, available through a Google Scholar search. Here once such result:Like engineering explained it can be a combination of both artificial lowering of torque + necessary loweing in the first few km/h. So I guess it's word against word at this point. And throw unaware users with little experience into the mix.
Regarding that tweet, direct drive does not mean gearless. It is referring to not using intermediate hydraulics.I believe Elon’s tweet is also consistent with this idea. The Plaid motor would have to have a ton of torque to work direct drive...
Engineering Explained was speculating, using outdated motor information.
Yeah, its not that bad. There are numerous scientific papers published in the literature, available through a Google Scholar search. Here once such result:
Ma, Cong, et al. "Vibration and torque ripple reduction of switched reluctance motors through current profile optimization." 2016 IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition (APEC). IEEE, 2016.
From the Abstract:
"This paper proposes a differential evolution (DE) optimization-based current profiling method for simultaneous reduction of the torque ripple and vibration of switched reluctance motors (SRMs).
"The mechanism of torque generation in SRMs produces radial forces in addition to the required tangential force.
"It has been shown that the radial forces acting on the stator are the main vibration source in SRMs and keeping the sum of the radial forces constant can reduce the magnitude of the significant harmonics of the sum of radial forces and further reduce vibration by avoiding the resonance caused by those harmonics.
"A simple method is proposed to model the torque and radial forces generated in the SRMs while considering the saturation effects.
"The resulting torque and radial force models are then used in the DE optimization process to generate the current profile of each phase in the form of Fourier series, where the Fourier coefficients of each phase current profile are determined to minimize the torque ripple and significant harmonics in the sum of the radial forces."
And here's the money shot: "Fig. 9. The waveforms of the measured torque and the actual optimal phase currents (conduction angle = 240°)"
View attachment 499501
The paper concludes:
"This paper has proposed a simple and effective optimal current profiling algorithm to minimize the vibration and torque ripple of an SRM.
The results have shown a significant reduction of the variation of the sum of the radial forces while retaining a low torque ripple by the proposed method compared to a nonoptimal current profile."
So my conclusion is that smart algorithms and even smarter engineers have tamed torque ripple. PM me if you need access to the paper discussed above.
Cheers!
That is my guess, plus limiting stress, and warranty issues, on rwd cars.