voip-ninja
Give me some sugar baby
I don't disagree with you on MRR - it is getting ridiculous. But something like EAP will need constant and recurring investment to become truly safe and reliable. Counting on cash from car sales to fund it isn't really sustainable. A subscription model makes a ton of sense there.
As far as competition, the Model 3 is actually making a dent in market share and it's been noticed. Ford has essentially killed their ICE lineup of sedans to focus on EV, and it seems the others are shelling out big bucks to enter that market. Read some of their shareholder reports. It's not a side project anymore. They're shifting major amounts of capital. Tesla massively disrupted the market. It's in the middle of an epic shift. And all without a massive government carbon tax! Imagine that, capitalism out-maneuvering politicians. Who'd have thought that possible? (Answer: Every capitalist that ever lived, including this guy)
If you think that what Tesla is doing would have been successful without billions of dollars in government subsidies I have a bridge to sell you.
I am pretty much set against subsidies and government involvement, but if you really are trying to do something as landmark as shift the automotive landscape from fossil fuels to electric you will need the government carrot to get it done in a reasonable amount of time.
I don't really care if my Tesla ran on whale oil, I bought it because it's fun to drive and, at the time, it seemed like I was getting a pretty sweet deal due to tax credits.