The world would be a much better place if journalist can stick to highlighted.I guess I deserved that answer - yes I gathered that but why? I assume they think the over-explanation and generally machine-like reply helps them? It's an incredibly insensitive response, it sounds like it was written by the type of pedantic tech-bro you'd get on a forum like this one - all fact and no feeling. But legally, it probably doesn't help them.
And no - I think the letter was written just fine. Tesla's lawyer was presenting diagnostic logs from the car and making the case that the Tesla functioned exactly as designed and intended.
It was noted at the end that the sequence of events implied by the diagnostic logs would completely invalidate the plaintiff's version of the story.
we have not found any other instance of this sequence of events occurring—an unsupervised child manages to successfully shift the vehicle into gear and then apply the accelerator pedal—and we do not believe it is reasonably foreseeable. We trust you will consider the above before taking any further action in this matter.
Translation of the last sentence: We have data backing us up, don't try anything stupid to screw with us.