You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
How they can say being restricted to less than 15mph isn't core functioning I'll never know.
Yep! This was fixed by the way. The vehicle is fully operational and fit for purpose now but the main issue is that it requires further service centre visits (which there has been 7 in total) to fix a further 4-5 issues all relating to build quality/fit and finish but my question to Tesla at what point do we agree that this vehicle is not of satisfactory build quality?Is it a model 3 performance?
sorry..
I am surprised Mercedes and particularly AMG’s dont have the same level of negativity as Teslas if I’m honest, my last 4 cars have all been AMG’s and every single one of them had to go in for something. Failed headlights on my A45, C63 had a failed puddle light and a permanently opened rear view camera which caused issues opening the boot, GLC63S was probably the worst, 5 visits for squeaking brakes which they never resolved properly, both puddle lights failed and the ventilation fan in the dash failed.I picked up a MiC M3 LR AWD on May 22nd: it is easy to check where the car was built by looking at the VIN: made in China cars start "L". Interesting comment about the 100% charge: the car was delivered with a 100% charge from the Superchargers at Cribbs Causeway.
Other than lacking 4 valve caps...as did all the new MiC M3s in the car park, the car is basically flawless. Fit and finish up to Mercedes levels...and I've had a few... and all have had issues resolved by the dealer. But I know that Mercedes owners do reject cars for many of the same reasons cited in this thread.
With 110 miles run I'm happy, although I'm less convinced by the "Vegan Leather", the now gone C63 had nappa leather, the Tesla stuff looks the same, but doesn't feel the same.
My Feb 2020 SR+ is still as good as new after 12,000 miles. I do realise I am one of the lucky ones and can only guess that good labour is hard to find at the right price around the plant as most of the faults mentioned happened on the line. There is no doubt that there isn't any quality control at the end of the line and if the car drives its gone. I feel for those with issues and oddly most seem to be with M3P's.I think that all car makers have issues - its just Tesla is much more in the spotlight than others. My 18 month Model 3 hasn't had a thing wrong with it - not one. Well, a smashed wing mirror but that was entirely the fault of the garage wall!
With 110 miles run I'm happy, although I'm less convinced by the "Vegan Leather", the now gone C63 had nappa leather, the Tesla stuff looks the same, but doesn't feel the same.
Despicable behaviour. I am increasingly fed up with Tesla as a company. I said it before and I'll say it again, sooner or later they're going to be in for a rude awakening...Update for you all that are interested: Tesla have responded to my rejection claim which cited unsatisfactory condition of the car with evidence provided of misaligned interior trims, creases to the drivers seat which was replaced 4 weeks ago due to it being delivered with creases to the thigh bolster, pealing rear spoiler and defects with multiple door seals. Note there were approx 20 previous faults - most of which were repaired. The most severe fault was a frunk lock failure which effectively disabled the vehicle as it is unable to drive >15MPH if the frunk isnt properly closed. Tesla have essentially rejected my claim stating that the faults do not relate to core functioning of the vehicle. I have countered them citing the Consumer Rights Act 2015 and the sales of goods act 1979. In both acts there is no mention of "significant faults relating to the core functioning of the vehicle". It does however state clearly that Tesla are allowed one attempt to fix a manufacturing fault with the vehicle and if unsuccessful, it is within my right to reject the vehicle within 6 months of ownership. Both acts also state that: goods are of satisfactory quality if they meet the standard a reasonable person would regard as satisfactory, taking into account age, mileage and value of the vehicle. Using only one example that i put forward to them; my rear spoiler should not be peeling away on my brand new £60k car that has only a few thousand miles.
I am awaiting their next move....
I was talking about my car (and comparing it to my wife's VW ID.3) with a group of friends, one of whom was another Tesla owner. The non-Tesla owners were all interested in our experiences and many were contemplating an EV as their next car. What was interesting was that most of them were very well aware of Tesla's reputation for poor build quality and lamentable service. So, this less-than-stellar reputation is certainly getting widely shared now. Tesla do need to be careful here - reputation once lost can be very hard to win back.
As some balance, us two Tesla owners (two Model 3s and an S between us), while admitting the build quality wasn't great in comparison to other brands, had few real issues to complain about. A few minor delivery snags between us and then 100% reliable motoring since.
Are you though "one of the lucky ones"?. Forums always bring out the worst. That is what they are there for. My 2019 LR is generally fine. 1 visit to an SC for a non build quality related issue. Clearly Tesla are not in the top echelons when it comes to quality I am just not clear as to how bad they are. Or is it more about how bad they are at taking responsibility for and fixing the issues when they do occur?My Feb 2020 SR+ is still as good as new after 12,000 miles. I do realise I am one of the lucky ones and can only guess that good labour is hard to find at the right price around the plant as most of the faults mentioned happened on the line. There is no doubt that there isn't any quality control at the end of the line and if the car drives its gone. I feel for those with issues and oddly most seem to be with M3P's.
You say "reputation for poor build quality and lamentable service". Yet I and plenty of others have a flawless car, and have had fantastic service from them (at Bristol). They even gave me a free part that was worth £300 just because they couldn't find the box for it.
It's my experience in life, that if you approach a company (which, lets face it, is just people doing a job) with a friendly smile, and understanding tone and are polite yet persistent with your problems, you can get an awful lot resolved. If on the other hand you approach a situation saying "I know my rights!", saying how awful it is and making threatening statements, you will be met with resistance. This is human nature.
I would agree with this in terms of initial perception and the unfortunate reality of ownership.You know a Mercedes is a quality car before you even start looking because of the places it is advertised and the glossy promos that emphasise that aspect. The reality is that, in general, luxury car brands are the least reliable as evidenced through surveys of owners by Which magazine.
I would agree with this in terms of initial perception and the unfortunate reality of ownership.
So far nothing i have read on here sounds worse than my experience at Mercedes. What is different and I hadn’t really thought about is that they dont have that luxury brand recognition yet which buys them some leway on the service side.
It works both ways - Tesla used to throw a set of alloy wheels or a wall charger at owners if they could get somebody else to buy one which consequently meant lots of owners were talking them up. Now the benefits aren't so great the truth is coming out a little more but people are also naturally drawn to confirmation bias at times. The classic "would you buy it again" or "is it as good as you expected", given its a new type of car for most, is met with positive comments to avoid admitting a mistake. So arguably, owners commenting negatively is an admission they made a mistake, whereas if an AMG Merc had a problem, people would be surprised and think you'd been unlicky so admitting it is easier. Things are also linked to expectation, issues with Tesla are now so commonly talked about, 3 or 4 problems isn't seen as a bad car, a single issue on an AMG and its being talked about. We've had BMWs for 20 years before trying Tesla and I have to say Tesla isn't as good on quality of materials, build or reliability. My Model S is a good one by all accounts, buy its still needed 5 service visits in 3 years (rear camera, autopilot failings, steerting universal joint seizing which is damn scary when it happens, door card coming away every time I closed the door etc) and now the seat is having problems and I'm told its normal and they've suggested I don't have it as far back on the runners to stop it squeaking. Oh, and not to mention the eMMC issues. I ran a 6 series before and in 80k miles it had not a single problem.Tesla "suffers" from not having the advertising and marketing promotion to give people that extra luxury feel-good factor. That is a choice by the company but it does make the brand even more sensitive to customer responses. Despite this, on balance, I am in favour of Tesla's choice ... the product is supposed to sell itself and so far that has been working.