Terminator857
Active Member
I'd be surprised if NATO, or even just the U.S. couldn't get rid of Putin in short order.Getting NATO involved in the conflict would be a big win for Putin. ...
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'd be surprised if NATO, or even just the U.S. couldn't get rid of Putin in short order.Getting NATO involved in the conflict would be a big win for Putin. ...
Now you are talking .... like this is Somalia.
I'd be surprised if NATO, or even just the U.S. couldn't get rid of Putin in short order.
Didn’t Hitler do something like this with false flag ops on the border with Poland bck in 1939?
Oil plunges as much as 17% as UAE says support output hike (28 min ago)
Oil prices fall most in 2 years as UAE supports output hike
Global oil prices fell on Wednesday by the most in nearly two years after OPEC member the United Arab Emirates said it supported pumping more oilinto a market roiled by supply disruptions due to sanctions on Russia after it invaded Ukraine.www.reuters.com
Well, there is those pesky nukes though…
If there were no nukes involved the USAF/NATO could pretty much delete the Russian presence in Ukraine in like 2-3 days.
Honestly I think it’s time for the US to leverage its enormous spacelift advantage to build a ballistic missile shield. It was an impossible pipe dream in the 1980s, but Falcon makes it possible, and Starship makes it easy.
There's already a shield over Chernobyl, more exactly a sarcophagus. Problem is, cracking that open salts the earth (well, much of the EU) with a very large DB.
I’m talking about this kind of nuke though…
View attachment 778843
Triad has 3 legs. Missle shield only counters 1 of those legs. That's why MAD
A 4th leg is large DBs when in the hands of a belligerent.
If not, maybe we could hire that teenager that tracked Elon's plane.Missile shield protects against ICBMs and SLBMs.
...SAR might even be able track submarines!...
Maybe his ideas are enough, although with your bias, ideas may not matter much. He also says, and I agree...No to the No fly zone.I appreciate the sharing of good sources, but a little intro or summary or review would be helpful. Especially when some may not be inclined to seek political analysis from ZZ Top in a garage.
His real name is Justin King. He’s what’s called an adversarial journalist. He’s also an ex-private military contractor. He comes from a military family, born in Japan. He’s spent time in jail as a result of some of his military “work.”You said it so nicely
Russia has good long range air defence, I don't know if any of the Ukrainian planes would make it all the way to Moscow.Anyone know why the Ukrainian air force haven't bombed Moscow to get back at Putin?
If 40 million Ukrainian citizens waved white flags and walked up to the 40 mile long convoy and said they want to surrender, it would be over a million people per mile. How would the Russians handle that? Or if they all decided to take Putin's offer and go into Russia. How would their infrastructure handle that. The US Mexican border has only a fraction of that and has trouble placing people on planes in the middle of the night to get them dispursed.
Would Putin just kill them all and be worse than Hitler or would his economy take a major hit from the cost of keeping them in his country?
The best hope of Ukraine getting planes and helicopters is if Russian pilots hand them over $1,000,000 per plane and $500,000 per helicopter, with guaranteed resettlement in the West.Getting NATO involved in the conflict would be a big win for Putin.
Right now, war against Ukraine is really not popular in Russia, that's why the whole operation was kept secret until the very beginning.
If NATO gets involved, he can say that war is between Russia and NATO, instead of Russia and Ukraine. And russian public would buy this.
Dodger, I don't agree with this, Ukraine needs peace to prevent the death of a lot of innocent civilians, and I mean a lot, anything these else is a secondary consideration.The West should make Putin's departure a condition of the peace, along with seizing assets sufficient to pay for the recovery.
That's the thing, it will not be fighting Russia, its fighting Ukraine.Getting NATO involved in the conflict would be a big win for Putin.
Right now, war against Ukraine is really not popular in Russia, that's why the whole operation was kept secret until the very beginning.
If NATO gets involved, he can say that war is between Russia and NATO, instead of Russia and Ukraine. And russian public would buy this.
Not a False Flag.Didn’t Hitler do something like this with false flag ops on the border with Poland bck in 1939?
The best hope of Ukraine getting planes and helicopters is if Russian pilots hand them over $1,000,000 per plane and $500,000 per helicopter, with guaranteed resettlement in the West.
The logistics of this are not difficult there are airports in Ukrainian controlled territory with functional runways.
The first pilot lands, gets out of the plane and surrenders, then they slowly do it one at a time.
The pilots might have family back home, but if they are young and well educated, they might take the risk.
Life will be great for them, the only consideration is, people they may leave behind..
UK will supply anti-aircraft missiles to Ukraine. During an appearance in the House of Commons on Wednesday, Defense Minister Ben Wallace announced that the United Kingdom is analyzing the possibility of supplying Starstreak anti-aircraft missiles to Ukraine.
These high-speed missiles, which were requested by President Volodymyr Zelensky's regime, are considered by the British as "defensive weapons" that will allow the Ukrainian Army to "better protect its skies."
Wallance acknowledged that the UK has sent 3,615 NLAW anti-tank missiles, small arms, and ammunition. The British government will also send Javelin anti-tank missiles.