You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Gross figures are no more accurate than net, too many variables per person:Yeah I agree with previous posters, gross figures are the best things to state. Can anyone beat the eye watering gross figure I pay for MYP + EAP 3 yr from Arval (10k miles / year) = £1385 / month. Includes insurance / tyres / maintenance (wot maintenance?!). Not sure I can burn through enough tyres to make it better value.
It doesn't matter, neither are relevant figures for suitable for person to person comparison, due to variations in age/location/lease companies.Net figures have all of that variation, plus individual tax variation - therefore they can only be less accurate.
It’s very difficult because insurance is bundled in which is a postcode lottery plus occupation, mileage, business mileage, points on license etc that could alter the monthly cost by £150 between people. Then is a home charger included, does your company include early termination protection, yearly mileage, length of lease term, size of company/volume discount and probably a few more variables.Ok then, as an example - what about if we compare gross salary sacrifice values of people of similar age and location, but different lease companies. Could we then, perhaps, start to understand differences between lease companies??! It sounds crazy but it might just work.
Maybe a better comparison is difference between Salary Sacrifice vs. best finance deal available (for same individual, and car model etc., finance-period)
Sounds like this may be turning into a pissing contest a bit like the Wh/mile one has.