So about these straddles.. whats the reasoning on going out 4 weeks or a month?
Right now ATM short straddle
for 7/29 pays $115, 30 days to expiry, that's $3.8/day
for 7/8 pays $61, 9 days to expiry, that's $6.7/day
If you're selling straddless to harvest theta, wouldn't a shorter time frame make more sense? Also gives you easier management/rolling if sp makes a big move.
OK, I initially proposed 4 weeks because it was Tuesday and sunny... no particular reason, but I was fantasising about having 2000 $TSLA shares and playing that straddle for $250k
Indeed, IV is high for next week - I guess the P&D causing that...
I was dwelling on it further and I thought perhaps only committing 50% of shares against covered calls would also provide some insurance against a rally, without the need to purchase LEAPS - puts I worry less about as my genetic bullish disposition to $TSLA biases me to the upside - and from here I think we have more upside than down
The other benefit of doing a 50% trade on this is that you can continue another iteration even if the first batch of shares get called away, meaning you take more of the upside gains. Of course the converse can happen, you can get several down weeks/months, then again, not betting the whole farm allow a second bite at a lower strike and more chance to reverse in the opposite direction
Of course there's a chance than one get encumbered with shares and zero cash, then you sell exclusively calls, and the other side of the coin, it all goes to cash and you go heavy on puts
I very much appreciated
@jeewee3000's post above - would be a "post of merit" in the "other" thread, and indeed, entering into a strangle is higher probability of full profits, but the straddle is better, IMO, in times of high volatility
Note that I have no data to back this up, just a feeling in my glands, this is not financial advice, I'm an idiot*, etc.
*101% for sure