doggusfluffy
Closed
Pop up homes for snowbirds perhaps?
Did they add solar panels and Powerwalls to these stores?
The Tesla PowerHome.
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Pop up homes for snowbirds perhaps?
Did they add solar panels and Powerwalls to these stores?
I would think that the kind of modifications required to boost power output would mean the factory warranty was voided. It would be quite a risk to buy a Model S from aftermarket modification company.Some rumour about a 900 HP Tesla Model S P85D currently under development by Larte: InsideEVs
The mobile container stores, which were designed in house, rolled out several months ago in Europe. Today, there are three mobile stores roaming around Europe. The Santa Barbara mobile store is the first in the U.S.
How does Bosch want to make money on this? Why not work directly with Tesla providing development services, software and components? It seems most of this can be embedded within Tesla's architecture plus maybe a few more sensors. You don't need a robot to drive a Tesla. It's already a programmable car.
Nice movement going into the Holiday weekend. Surprised with the volume in the last 20 minutes - 30K share spikes shown on level 2 without any news feed during the time frame.
The key is that Bosch (and Google for that matter) insist on "all or nothing" approach and use expensive LIDAR (thousands of $ per car), while Tesla is much more practical in their approach. Tesla does not insist on "robotic" car in some distant future; they will settle to autopilot covering tedious parts of driving by the end of this year. The hardware required for Tesla autopilot is much less expensive, and provides functionality now, with steady gradual additions with time (forward looking radar and camera and ultrasonic sensors). This is clearly a winning strategy, because by the time LIDAR becomes less than prohibitively expensive Tesla will have hundreds of thousands of cars roaming around the globe with autopilot.
BTW, the remarkable part about Tesla hardware is that it was added to all cars *without* any price increase, all the while gross margins were continuing to rise, in spite of unfavorable forex...
- - - Updated - - -
I think that this is usual Friday's shenanigans between the option writers and holders, each of them see an opportunity to manipulate price rather cheaply due to the light pre-holiday volume. What is surprising this time around is that usually victorious option writers seem to be beaten back today - they clearly were trying to drive price toward $245, but are failing so far...
Personally, I'd love to finish above 247 after the option people are done playing around! Thanks for the explanation, I could not figure out why the strong volume at the end of the day. Makes total sense now.
My bet is that we'll close above $247.5
The key is that Bosch (and Google for that matter) insist on "all or nothing" approach and use expensive LIDAR (thousands of $ per car), while Tesla is much more practical in their approach. Tesla does not insist on "robotic" car in some distant future; they will settle to autopilot covering tedious parts of driving by the end of this year. The hardware required for Tesla autopilot is much less expensive, and provides functionality now, with steady gradual additions with time (forward looking radar and camera and ultrasonic sensors). This is clearly a winning strategy, because by the time LIDAR becomes less than prohibitively expensive Tesla will have hundreds of thousands of cars roaming around the globe with autopilot.
BTW, the remarkable part about Tesla hardware is that it was added to all cars *without* any price increase, all the while gross margins were continuing to rise, in spite of unfavorable forex...
jhm said:How does Bosch want to make money on this? Why not work directly with Tesla providing development services, software and components? It seems most of this can be embedded within Tesla's architecture plus maybe a few more sensors. You don't need a robot to drive a Tesla. It's already a programmable car.
Jim and Vger - do you two know something I don't? What on earth makes you think TM & Bosch aren't working together?The key is that Bosch (and Google for that matter) insist on "all or nothing" approach and use expensive LIDAR (thousands of $ per car), while Tesla is much more practical in their approach. Tesla does not insist on "robotic" car in some distant future; they will settle to autopilot covering tedious parts of driving by the end of this year. The hardware required for Tesla autopilot is much less expensive, and provides functionality now, with steady gradual additions with time (forward looking radar and camera and ultrasonic sensors). This is clearly a winning strategy, because by the time LIDAR becomes less than prohibitively expensive Tesla will have hundreds of thousands of cars roaming around the globe with autopilot.
BTW, the remarkable part about Tesla hardware is that it was added to all cars *without* any price increase, all the while gross margins were continuing to rise, in spite of unfavorable forex...
Jim and Vger - do you two know something I don't? What on earth makes you think TM & Bosch aren't working together?
Jim and Vger - do you two know something I don't? What on earth makes you think TM & Bosch aren't working together?
Yeah, I get Tesla's strategy on this. What I don't get is Bosch's strategy. Tesla can easily integrate LIDAR into their cars when it become economical to do so. So again, I do not really grasp what Bosch aims to get out of this demonstration.
Elon s while ago explained why they will *not* be using LIDAR, unlike Google. Perhaps this is the piece that you are missing, along with what jhm explained in his post.
BTW, there is a TMC member Vger, I am not him.
- - - Updated - - -
relevance :smile:
Elon s while ago explained why they will *not* be using LIDAR, unlike Google. Perhaps this is the piece that you are missing, along with what jhm explained in his post.
BTW, there is a TMC member Vger, I am not him.
- - - Updated - - -
relevance :smile:
Apologies to the two Vs.
I wonder if TM could use the most appropriate parts of Bosch's and Mobileye's offerings.