sundaymorning
Active Member
If analysts actually knew what they were doing, then they wouldn't be working for anyone. Most people work because they need the money....
-
Want to remove ads? Register an account and login to see fewer ads, and become a Supporting Member to remove almost all ads.
- Status
If analysts actually knew what they were doing, then they wouldn't be working for anyone. Most people work because they need the money....
Surely NVIDIA is a bit over-cooked for the moment?
I am a noob using Scottrade and I have to wait three days for every transaction to settle before I can buy shares again. By the time the funds are available from my last transaction, Q4 delivery numbers will be out and I will miss my window to jump in and take advantage of any positive news. I could always sell a kidney...
I keep watching this over and over.....it looks like the system calculated that the red car was getting too close to the black SUV and determined that a crash was likely and then alerted the driver?
I was thinking along the same lines. I am guessing there will be a slight "correction" over the next couple of days that would allow me to jump in at 110-12ish. The expectation seems to favor a positive Q4 earning report for NVDA (They have their hands on many different markets and are Tesla's primary AP hardware supplier). That would be a nice "pop" to catch in the first week of February. I am speculating btw. I am no expert.
I was surprised by the sudden rise, still have about 25% dry powder I was hoping to invest around 210 this year, before the deliver numbers and Jan.4 event. Last week I was still doing some daily plays (buy & sell) with few dollar differences and sold on Friday afternoon hoping to buy back few dollars lower this week. Now, I may not be able to do that at a price lower than my last sell on Friday...
I still have a significant core position, so I do not mind the value of that increasing, though
I still have a significant core position, so I do not mind the value of that increasing, though
dc_h
Active Member
And what happens when Tesla dumps nvidia for their own chips? Assuming they will make their own.
Mike Smith
Active Member
Someone is buying huge amounts of shares in the AH at the closing price. This also happened on Friday.
While I agree that this may be the case eventually (Elon really is a big fan of vertical manufacturing lines), that shouldn't be likely in the next couple of quarters, right?
NVDA has a monthly RSI of 95 and starting to look like an "eiffel tower" pattern on the monthly chart. It is also way above the upper bollinger band on the monthly chart. Please be careful.
What Do You Really Know About Eiffel-Tower Patterns?
mejojo
Active Member
I think it was just seeing the car ahead stopped and gave the same warning you'd get if just the red car had stopped.
larmor
Active Member
This is interesting news, since during a recent 250 mile drive yesterday, had this innocuous beep arise one or two times, but car icon did not go red and there was no accident. So this was likely a pre marker for a collision for vehicle one ahead with vehicle two cars ahead, which was averted with the closer vehicle slowing down. It did bring back my attention, as i was on AP.
dc_h
Active Member
Check out Spiegal on twitter. He just compared a Mercedes cartoon of smart driving to the real Tesla warning of real accident.
Tesla killer!!!
Tesla killer!!!
T3slaTulips
Member
It doesn't care if the red car hits the SUV or not. What it's doing is using the radar to see ahead of the red car and in this example it saw a slow moving object ahead that required application of the brakes. This tech is way ahead of other vendors AEBS systems that are only using cameras to avoid crashing into the closest object.
SebastianR
Active Member
(bolding mine)
Wow. That's very impressive. I believe that "could generate more good press" will be a massive understatement. If this is the new Tesla standard, then I don't think people will refer to Volvo as "safe vehicles" any longer. This video has massive potential to shift perceptions around autopilot & co.
Several people responded to this and gave you the answer that "growth is causing losses", which you probably wrote off as bs.
Maybe I can present you an alternative, a more palatable answer.
We all know all the way from mid 2015 through mid 2016, the big mess up was model X production issues. This caused damage in a few different ways:
- The production'isation took lot more cost
- There was lost revenue
- Most importantly SG&A (and R&D) was ramped up ahead of cycle, anticipating X revenue to come in earlier (which didn't), causing a deep gap between gross-profits and net-profits.
So all this turned expected profits into realised losses. Management clearly expressed regrets and have expressed that they learnt their lessons - no less, in writing!
What more can any one expect.
Effectively, we on the long side believe this to be more of a one time incident.
For you to be right, Tesla will have to have a model X sized mess up year in and year out. My advice to you, don't bet on it!
Even if they have failures here and there, there will be plenty of other revenue/product streams that will more than make up for mistakes. So be careful if you were to maintain a long-term short position.
PS:
You posted 483 messages in 72 business days at a rate of 6.7 posts/bus-day. You sure do post a lot of stuff.
"first of all... i don't actually post that much content." -- This is factually incorrect.
Last edited:
T3slaTulips
Member
Yuri_G
Member
The radar basically detected that the SUV in front of the red car had slammed on its brakes. You can see the brake lights through the red car's windows right as the Tesla's emergency braking signal goes off.
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked
