Like clockwork, a bottom-feeder plaintiff's law firm announces an "investigation" into the terms of the deal and it triggers a minor algo selloff. For those unfamiliar, with every M&A deal (and I mean literally every single deal) a plaintiff's firm launches an "investigation" and files a shareholder derivative suit claiming that the deal price is too low or too high. Angry investors sign up thinkiing they will recoup their losses and the scummy firm tries to extract a settlement from the companies in the deal. Not wanting to drag out to expensive litigation, the companies often pay off the firm a tiny amount to make them go away. Angry investors get a tiny slice of the tiny settlement and remain angry.
Disclaimer: I admire many plaintiff's firms and believe they serve a critical function in the legal system. The ones filing strike suits like this exist only to line their own pockets, drive up deal costs and get in the way of companies' legitimate operations. They are the worst.
Disclaimer: I admire many plaintiff's firms and believe they serve a critical function in the legal system. The ones filing strike suits like this exist only to line their own pockets, drive up deal costs and get in the way of companies' legitimate operations. They are the worst.