Jack6591
Active Member
CANCER and CLIMATE CHANGE
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/01/17/opinion/sunday/cancer-and-climate-change.html?_r=0
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/01/17/opinion/sunday/cancer-and-climate-change.html?_r=0
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Nice reflection. It matters what we leave behind.CANCER and CLIMATE CHANGE
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/01/17/opinion/sunday/cancer-and-climate-change.html?_r=0
Great article, thanks for posting.CANCER and CLIMATE CHANGE
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/01/17/opinion/sunday/cancer-and-climate-change.html?_r=0
$100 million in 2017 bonds available, with $90 million being purchased by SpaceX: SolarCity - Prospectus Filed Pursuant to Rule 424
Since more and more customers are now choosing to buy solar systems with cash or a loan, it makes the cost of installation and the energy production from a system more critical to the customer. That's why the Equinox system's simple design, high-energy production, and good looks are a key selling point. Solar is now about more than just what customers are paying for energy.
SunPower trying to have it both ways. That rarely works out.
What do you see as the problem with SunPower trying to serve multiple segments? Or are you thinking of something else?SunPower trying to have it both ways. That rarely works out.
If you're going to be "full service", you need to provide the services. What's the point of signing a PPA with someone when the install is done by an unknown entity and any needs you have down the line will be handled by the same unknown entity or some other if the original goes out of business?What do you see as the problem with SunPower trying to serve multiple segments? Or are you thinking of something else?
I like SolarCity's vertical integration, but it seems that other players have to figure out where they can add value and where they are better off partnering. For example, Sunrun mostly partners with other installers so it can focus more on marketing, sales and financing. SunPower is firstly a panel maker, so I see this as an attempt to assure that their products remain relevant to the rooftop market. They can't simply rely on small installers to select their product. They need to round out the total package to compete with SolarCity.If you're going to be "full service", you need to provide the services. What's the point of signing a PPA with someone when the install is done by an unknown entity and any needs you have down the line will be handled by the same unknown entity or some other if the original goes out of business?
To me, the value proposition of SCTY is that you get top products and top service from a known entity who will be around forever. If I'm going with a stranger, why would I pay the premium price of a PPA? I would just finance the purchase outright.
I also like the additional sales and marketing efforts...which will lead to SolarCity getting some calls for competing bids so it should float all boats for rooftop solar. SunPower's decision also flies in the face of the dead end business model line of reasoning in which all the wealthy solar customers have been cherry picked and all that's left is a sub-prime leasing market. I think SolarCity will compare favorably.I like SolarCity's vertical integration, but it seems that other players have to figure out where they can add value and where they are better off partnering. For example, Sunrun mostly partners with other installers so it can focus more on marketing, sales and financing. SunPower is firstly a panel maker, so I see this as an attempt to assure that their products remain relevant to the rooftop market. They can't simply rely on small installers to select their product. They need to round out the total package to compete with SolarCity.
I'm not sure. There's no substantial news that I am aware of.Anyone have thoughts on why Solar City fell nearly 7% today?