Welcome to Tesla Motors Club
Discuss Tesla's Model S, Model 3, Model X, Model Y, Cybertruck, Roadster and More.
Register

SpaceX Launch/Satellite Contracts

This site may earn commission on affiliate links.
Must be an old contract, but Cygnus resupply to the ISS will be flying F9 for a while.
Here’s an Arstechica article about that. For obvious reasons, the Russian engines Northrup Grumman has been using are no longer available, the Ukrainian production facilities for the Antares stage are under threat.

About a year ago, months after the Russian-Ukrainian conflict erupted into a hot war, Northrop Grumman announced it would design and develop an all-American Antares rocket with Firefly that could be ready to fly by the end of 2024. The company calls the version of the Antares rocket to be retired with this week's launch the Antares 230+, while the new variant with Firefly's booster stage will be named the Antares 330.

Kurt Eberly, Northrop Grumman's director of space launch programs, said Sunday that the Antares 330 rocket is now expected to launch no sooner than mid-2025. Until then, Northrop has purchased three Falcon 9 launches with SpaceX to continue flying Cygnus cargo ships to the space station at a rate of about twice per year. The first of the Cygnus cargo missions to fly on a Falcon 9 is scheduled to take off in December from Cape Canaveral, Florida.
So the new Antares 330 rocket won’t fly for at least another 2 years. The F9 is really the only alternative to get Cygnus to LEO.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: Grendal and JB47394
A big one: 14 launches.
That article is interesting in that it makes the point that the reliability of the only reusable rocket was a chief factor is the selection of SpaceX for their launch needs. They also highlight the rapid cadence allowing them to get their fleet aloft quickly.

The article also points out they had plans to use New Glenn, but it's not gonna be ready anytime soon. It also contrasts this with the decision Amazon has made to not use SpaceX services for Kupier...
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Grendal and mspohr
The article also points out they had plans to use New Glenn, but it's not gonna be ready anytime soon.
The inaugural launch is supposed to loft the ESCAPADE mission, which has a provisional launch window of August 6-15, 2024. In theory, they've got 11 months. The contract is for $20 million, which is an interesting bit of trivia for how much an inaugural launch can discount costs.

Here's a picture from the inside of Blue Origin's production facility linked from a Space.com article. The contrast with SpaceX's facility is meme-worthy. This looks like something an AI image generator would produce, but they're showing the same bits and bobs that SpaceX has. It also seems to show that they really are sticking with aluminum. (Reminder: Falcon 9 booster-reusable can loft 17 tons to LEO while New Glenn fully-reusable will be able to loft 45 tons)

ZwTHfDxeQo7GcAtcFkrGzh-1200-80.png.webp
 
  • Like
Reactions: scaesare
The inaugural launch is supposed to loft the ESCAPADE mission, which has a provisional launch window of August 6-15, 2024. In theory, they've got 11 months. The contract is for $20 million, which is an interesting bit of trivia for how much an inaugural launch can discount costs.

Here's a picture from the inside of Blue Origin's production facility linked from a Space.com article. The contrast with SpaceX's facility is meme-worthy. This looks like something an AI image generator would produce, but they're showing the same bits and bobs that SpaceX has. It also seems to show that they really are sticking with aluminum. (Reminder: Falcon 9 booster-reusable can loft 17 tons to LEO while New Glenn fully-reusable will be able to loft 45 tons)

ZwTHfDxeQo7GcAtcFkrGzh-1200-80.png.webp
New Glenn 45 tons to LEO is an expendable second stage. Jarvis is rumored to be fully reusable and stainless steel.

Blue Origin has a secret project named “Jarvis” to compete with SpaceX
 
Ars technica In a surprise move, the military’s spaceplane will launch on Falcon Heavy

A military solicitation document released when the Air Force procured the rocket for the USSF-52 mission—which we now know will launch the X-37B—said this mission would require a lift capacity of around 14,000 pounds (6,350 kilograms) into a geostationary transfer orbit, a highly elliptical loop around Earth ranging some 22,000 miles (35,000 kilometers) from the planet. That would be a big change from the past missions of the military's mini-space shuttle.
 
Considering they tell us next to nothing about what it does, this was a very strange statement!
They're broadening its operational envelope, which could be considered exciting in some circles. If they can get to geostationary orbit, then they have access to the hardware up there. Of all nations.

The funny thing about geostationary orbit is that all the satellites are roughly stationary relative to each other. So if you broke one up a little, it wouldn't pose anywhere near the risk of satellite debris in low earth orbit. It's a fine place for hostilities.
 
“I would tell you you’re only beginning to see some of the exciting things that we have planned for the X-37”. Considering they tell us next to nothing about what it does, this was a very strange statement!
From the article @Grendal posted:

The mission, designated USSF-52, will conduct a wide range of tests, including operating the reusable spaceplane in new orbital regimes, experimenting with space domain awareness technologies, and investigating the radiation effects on materials provided by NASA, the Space Force said in a statement Nov. 8.

"Space domain awareness technologies"... Hmmm. Some sort of ability to detect nearby and/or approaching, and potentially hostile, satellites?


Also it says the X-37 was previously in space for 900+ days... wow. It's basically a reusable satellite...
 
  • Like
Reactions: JB47394 and Grendal
How does something that is in geo stationary orbit, be reusable? I mean there is no way it is going to deorbit from there and land. The energy required will be just enormous, and even then the reentry speeds are much higher than anything in LEO
 
  • Like
Reactions: Grendal
How does something that is in geo stationary orbit, be reusable? I mean there is no way it is going to deorbit from there and land. The energy required will be just enormous, and even then the reentry speeds are much higher than anything in LEO

Yeah, it won't be in geo orbit - but it can swing by that orbital distance from the earth. I believe the article explained that it'll be in a highly elliptical orbit that'll intersect a geo orbit. So, yes, the idea of hanging out there and then coming back isn't being contemplated right now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Grendal