Welcome to Tesla Motors Club
Discuss Tesla's Model S, Model 3, Model X, Model Y, Cybertruck, Roadster and More.
Register

Blog SpaceX Offers to Buy Out Homeowners Near Texas Launchpad

This site may earn commission on affiliate links.


SpaceX wants to buy out residents of a community near its planned rocket launch site in Texas, according to a report from Business Insider.

Boca Chica Village is a a small community of mostly elderly in South Texas. SpaceX has reportedly offered a non-negotiable deal to buy homeowners out of their properties at three times the appraised value. A letter sent to residents and obtained by Business Insider said residents have until September 26 to accept the offer. Business Insider reports that several residents plan to reject the offer.

Boca Chica Village is about 1.5 miles from SpaceX’s launchpad on Boca Chica Beach, where the company is conducting tests for its planned mission to Mars.

Testing has included static engine firing and 500-foot launches and hovers over the site. SpaceX said in the letter to residents that continued testing will likely create “increased disruption” to Boca Chica residents.

“When SpaceX first identified Cameron County as a potential spaceport location, we did not anticipate that local residents would experience significant disruption from our presence,” according to the letter obtained by Business Insider. 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Why didn't they just build on a remote site in the first place? This had to be a consideration before building the launch pad.
Exactly. Why choose a spot so close to a community?
And why did local officials let them?

I know they wanted to be as far south as possible for clear orbital mechanics advantages, and to fly over as few inhabited areas as possible. But still, there had to be other choices with a bit more clearance.
Or maybe not, and what do we know!
 
With US regulations, the launch site pretty much needs to be on a coastline, and there's very little coastline that isn't either populated or in some way protected.
Good point. I think that is very likely the main reason why Tesla chose Boca Chica. In addition, the coastline location needed for US launch sites also has to be able to provide a launch trajectory eastward out over open ocean, further limiting site selections, and it needs to be accessible by a decent road.
 
I know they wanted to be as far south as possible for clear orbital mechanics advantages, and to fly over as few inhabited areas as possible. But still, there had to be other choices with a bit more clearance.
Or maybe not, and what do we know!

There's a huge logistical advantage to being in CONUS as well, so that was another variable...and of course being on US territory is pretty important. No doubt they investigated Wallops too, for instance, and no doubt they decided against it because of the unfavorable [for GEO] launch trajectory. That said, it does seems like Wallops is kind of perfect for Starlink and all the other mega constellations...

One could imagine PR being a really good candidate for a launch site with potentially very favorable municipal influence, but of course that adds the 'gotta get there' factor. (Note that The Googs launch Loon from there, though not necessarily for the same reasons you'd launch a rocket...).

Hawaii is another interesting option, but you have the same middle-of-nowhere problem and it will be likely near impossible to secure land for launching east. Then there's also Kwajelein, which of course is even more in the middle of nowhere than Hawaii, but at least already has a rudimentary facility.


Ultimately I think SpaceX's long term plan has been to launch from barges. We've seen it in various presentations; we've seen it proven technically feasible with Zenit. I think this buy-out proposal is trying to solve more of a short term problem.
 
I doubt SpaceX is seeking another launch site anytime soon. Hard to come by, can't imagine the added hassle and expense. It seems more plausable that SpaceX will look to expand beyond the testing of Starship prototypes. Five years ago SpaceX stated they would be launching F9 and FH rockets in Texas. The FAA signed off on the Environmental Impact Study and up to now SpaceX has spent in excess of 100 million for development. This past August the Starhopper/Starship suborbital testing resulted in the FAA signing off on an addendum to the original 2014 EIS. This addresses issues such as the impact of methane propellant, brush fire mitigation, noise, etc. The document basically states that there will be no significant environmental changes and the original document doesn't need to be rewritten. If SpaceX is presently good to go for testing, why bother with resident buyouts? SpaceX could just keep their current launch/testing protocols in place, unless they have bigger intentions. Pursuing Starship orbital launches would undoubtedly trigger more FAA environmental review, but this seems to be the most logical strategy.
https://www.faa.gov/about/office_or...pact_statement/media/August_2019_Addendum.pdf
 
Exactly. Why choose a spot so close to a community?
And why did local officials let them?

I know they wanted to be as far south as possible for clear orbital mechanics advantages, and to fly over as few inhabited areas as possible. But still, there had to be other choices with a bit more clearance.
Or maybe not, and what do we know!

@e-FTW your comment made me curious so I started Googling...

spacexgooglemaps.JPG


Satellite view of SpaceX Launch Facility shows it is relatively remote, and it looks like Boca Chica Village is the only community within a 5 mile radius.

That said, if you look at the actual street view of Boca Chica Village:
Google Maps

A lot of the houses were already boarded up/empty when these images were taken in 2011.

The fact that SpaceX is offering three times the appraised value to what looks to be an environmentally unsound place to live (wetland, hurricane-prone, rising sea levels...) seems like a win-win for all involved.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dhanson865
The fact that SpaceX is offering three times the appraised value to what looks to be an environmentally unsound place to live (wetland, hurricane-prone, rising sea levels...) seems like a win-win for all involved.
I agree. I understand that people get attached to where they live. But this location barely inhabited yet still has road access and is about as southerly a US location as possible while allowing over-water eastbound launches.

SpaceX is offering way over market value for the homeowners who live there. And with rising ocean levels, the value of those properties a few decades from now will be essentially zero.
 
Read the following article a couple of days ago. As the saying goes, money isn't everything. Even holding a buyout offer of 3 times the appraised home value. Would be somewhat callous to not have some sympathy for the plight of some of the residents. Ray and Maria Pointer probably aren't leaving Boca Chica anytime soon.
SpaceX is trying to buy out a village in Texas to make way for its experimental Mars rockets

Thanks for posting that. To be clear, I have a tremendous amount of sympathy for any person being displaced from their home, particularly by forces with far deeper resources.

That said - these are, by their own admission, retired folks on a fixed income.

Furthermore, from that article:
Sam Clauson: You know, are we going to be safe here? Are we going to lose our land? You know, most of us came down here are here because we're retired and wanted a nice quiet place to live.

Unfortunately I don't think they will be safe there. They live in a hurricane-prone wetland that is in a 100-year flood plane (Zone AE according to the FEMA map). As can be seen by the history of catastrophic flooding throughout the state of Texas in the past 10 years, flood plane designations are no longer accurate representations of how frequently a geographic area will flood... due to the affects of climate change. So much so that the state itself is updating their flood maps based on new data:

https://www.statesman.com/news/20180928/more-extreme-rain-in-austin-could-change-flood-maps

In Austin, the new data show that 100-year rainfall amounts for 24 hours increased as much as 3 inches, up to 13 inches, in parts of the city.

This means that larger storms are occurring more often, and it takes more rain to make it a “rare” event, researchers said.

In Houston, the changes in precipitation frequency were even more significant. The 100-year estimates increased in parts of the city from 13 inches to 18 inches. Values that were previously classified as 100-year events are now much more frequent 25-year events, meaning they have a 4 percent chance of occurring in a given year instead of a 1 percent chance, researchers said.

...
Shunk said changes in the flood maps based on the new data also would affect people’s flood insurance. When the city completes its new flood plain study, it will give that information to FEMA for its maps, which are used to determine flood insurance requirements.

“That may be two or three years away,” he said. “We recommend that people call their insurer now to talk about how that may change.”

“It’s important for people to understand their flood risk so they can make decisions about flood insurance and flood risk and what to do to keep them and their family safe,” he said.


So, in 2-3 years, what happens when the Pointer's FEMA flood insurance is too expensive to keep due to their fixed income? What will they do when a storm hits? IMO, buyouts of flood-prone areas are absolutely better for fixed income folks living in those areas rather than rebuilding. Just look at Indonesia - they are moving their capital to an entirely different island and building it from scratch instead of trying to fix Jakarta. What chance do the Pointers have to sustain if a catastrophic hurricane hits?

Not to mention the long and arduous process of going through the traditional buyout route, making the (presumably) easy SpaceX transaction that much more attractive:
In Houston, a Rash of Storms Tests the Limits of Coping With Climate Change

Officials have sought to buy the homes of some people flooded after Harvey, with the intention of tearing those homes down so they can’t flood again. But the average buyout funded by the Federal Emergency Management Agency nationwide takes more than five years, according to data compiled by the Natural Resources Defense Council.

In the meantime, many homeowners give up and instead repair or rebuild in place — setting themselves up for future pain when the next storm strikes.


In this case, SpaceX must have the funds to offer them a lot more than a 3x valuation, which is probably still a nominal amount to them (max $225k per person). As a compromise SpaceX could(/should?) go above and beyond by assisting the residents in finding and purchasing comparable new homes that fulfill their stated needs ("safe" and "a nice quiet place to live") that aren't in a flood-prone area :)
 
Last edited:
SpaceX is currently in the middle of round two of issuing buyout offers to homeowners. Reappraisals have been happening for at least a few of the Boca Chica properties. Evidently some residents felt low-balled by their initial appraisals, although it should be noted that SpaceX was offering the appraisal amount times 3. SpaceX has put up a new deadline to accept a buyout, set to expire this Thursday, Oct. 17th.
The day of Elon's September Starship presentation he met with a few of the locals. This quote is from the Dallas News article at the bottom, "Musk met with seven villagers following the presentation, though others — the Heatons included — gave up waiting for him to show. Cheryl Stevens, who owns a house down the street from the Heatons, did stick around. The meeting was “sort of testy” at first, as the owners confronted Musk with their concerns after waiting a long time, though the mood eventually lightened, she said." Lol, maybe they can blame Tim Dodd for holding him up, but perhaps somebody should have warned those folks about Elon time.
SpaceX gives South Texas homeowners more time to consider buyout offers
 
I do feel for these folks, as these are probably all retirees or folks with seasonal houses. In a pretty unique setting.
The values are not that high, so SpaceX should be able to make a generous offer without setting a big precedent for any other areas they need to expand into.
 
perhaps somebody should have warned those folks about Elon time.

which is apparently very accurate when GF3 is involved.

Maybe Elon time was always just "new company startup time" and now that Tesla and SpaceX are more mature it really isn't that outlandish anymore.

Party Mode/Announcement day Elon is just behind because there is always some politician waiting off camera trying to bend his ear.