SR owners only (NOT SR+) What is your max range at 100% SOC?

[vickh]

SR- owners should only get a 100% charge of about 101 miles. (Of course the SR- is only sold in Canada, and they call it a SR. )

price?

 

[vickh]

Unfortunately you will see much lower range during cold weather than hot weather. Cabin heating in Tesla’s uses much more energy than cooling. Best range is when the weather is 65-75 degrees out.

What if you just use seat heaters? how does cold affect battery charging

 

[MP3Mike]

price?

$45k CAD ($34,276 USD.) (There is a $5k federal Canadian incentive and up to $8k incentive in Quebec.)

And minor correction the range is 150km or 93 miles.

 

[SlimJim]

I charged to 90% and it was 188 miles.
That's 188/9 x 10 = 209miles.

It is missing 11 miles.

 

[ChrisH]

SR- owners should only get a 100% charge of about 93 miles. (Of course the SR- is only sold in Canada, and they call it a SR. )

lol what?

 

[ElectricEel]

I thought it was supposed to be 220?

Only time I got 220 was brand new, after two chargers it was at 218 then after the update I was at 202 and now I'm at 206.

 

[ElectricEel]

Just charged to 100% yesterday. 216 miles reported. Everyone seems to be freaking out about how they have lost range..... Have you ever considered that the reading may be off? Has anyone actually drove from 100% down to 0% and recorded kw used and consumption rate? I doubt anyone has lost range, the car is just reporting less. Whether that is through a deliberate move by Tesla (maybe 0 doesn't actually mean zero anymore) or a software bug, we don't know.

I'm trying to do that but it's tough with life lol.

 

[lateulade]

I voluntarily downgraded my SR+ to SR after 6 months and 17k miles. I went from 238mi at 100% to 207, and my real world mileage seems to have taken a hit as well.

 

[ChrisH]

I voluntarily downgraded my SR+ to SR after 6 months and 17k miles. I went from 238mi at 100% to 207, and my real world mileage seems to have taken a hit as well.

well your downgrade would bring your 238 down to 220 at absolute best.

 

[SlimJim]

What can we do about it if Tesla locked up too much and they cannot fix it?

 

[ebmcs03]

Does charging speed taper once you get close to “100%” in the SR? I mean it’s a fake 100% right so ideally it should still charge pretty fast all the way to 100%

 

[ElectricEel]

What can we do about it if Tesla locked up too much and they cannot fix it?

Cry about it, J/k, but actually speak up in unison.

I voluntarily downgraded my SR+ to SR after 6 months and 17k miles. I went from 238mi at 100% to 207, and my real world mileage seems to have taken a hit as well.

Sounds like your in line with the rest of us. I've noticed my SR does not get even remotely close to the EPA Range or even the measly "206" at best I've gotten. 190 at 212 kw/m

 

[SlimJim]

Th

Does charging speed taper once you get close to “100%” in the SR? I mean it’s a fake 100% right so ideally it should still charge pretty fast all the way to 100%

they can fake the taper point also.

 

[ElectricEel]

Does charging speed taper once you get close to “100%” in the SR? I mean it’s a fake 100% right so ideally it should still charge pretty fast all the way to 100%

Kinda, Because our 100% is around 90% our taper stops at about 18kwh vs an SR+ taper at 99% gets down to 2kwh.

 

[zackmd1]

Sounds like your in line with the rest of us. I've noticed my SR does not get even remotely close to the EPA Range or even the measly "206" at best I've gotten. 190 at 212 kw/m

I am curious to know what this is based off of? Did you actually drive 100% to 0% where the car stopped driving and then recorded 190 at 212? At 212 wh/mi you should be getting close to 236 miles assuming a 50kw battery.

 

[super20g]

Mine used to charge to 220, battery was replaced and new battery charges to ~211.

 

[zackmd1]

Mine used to charge to 220, battery was replaced and new battery charges to ~211.

Mind if I ask why your battery was replaced? Pretty significant repair for a new vehicle...

 

[ElectricEel]

I am curious to know what this is based off of? Did you actually drive 100% to 0% where the car stopped driving and then recorded 190 at 212? At 212 wh/mi you should be getting close to 236 miles assuming a 50kw battery.

Based off 100% to 2%, and yes I agree I should be getting 238 at that rating.

I didn't take a picture because I was told by everyone to "shut up and enjoy the car," next I get a chance I will though.

Is 50kw the battery cap? When I see the watts drained I'm not even getting close to 50kw, does the range counter also calculate for everything else in the car? Like lights, and A/C?

 

[zackmd1]

Based off 100% to 2%, and yes I agree I should be getting 238 at that rating.

I didn't take a picture because I was told by everyone to "shut up and enjoy the car," next I get a chance I will though.

Is 50kw the battery cap? When I see the watts drained I'm not even getting close to 50kw, does the range counter also calculate for everything else in the car? Like lights, and A/C?

The kw used from my understanding should account for things like the cabin heater and other high voltage output. Not sure if it takes into account the 12v system but the 12v system is charged from the high voltage system so possibly but the 12v system should be a minimal draw. The assumption is that the SR is capped at 50 while the SR+ (our physical battery pack size) is around 54-55kw. At 225 wh/mi and 50kw that equates to 220 miles. SR+ at 54kw and 225 wh/mi is 240 miles.

 

[U5EM3]

If my calculations hold water, my 205 mile SR has had just under 7% range loss in under 6 months and 8000 miles.

I do live in the deep South, so heat is a factor. June through August averaged 95+ degrees daily.

I am in almost same situation. Was 240miles at 100% SOC before downgrade. Now I am around 208miles at 100% SOC. Live in Florida.