FH have all been payload free (though some with fairings)I thought they stopped sans-payload F9 static fires a long time ago? There was a huge row in the industry when that happened...
List of FH and F9:
List of Falcon Static Fires – ElonX.net
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
FH have all been payload free (though some with fairings)I thought they stopped sans-payload F9 static fires a long time ago? There was a huge row in the industry when that happened...
FH have all been payload free (though some with fairings)
List of FH and F9:
List of Falcon Static Fires – ElonX.net
Nelson says the plan is to have an uncrewed Starship land on the Moon a year from now, and then do a crewed landing late 2024. What is he smoking…Administrator Nelson also shared crucial details about SpaceX's Starship lunar lander. This is currently the only vehicle that has been chosen by NASA to land humans on the Moon as part of the Artemis program. Commenting on Starship's progress, he revealed that:
I ask the question all the time of Jim Free, is the Starship meeting each of the benchmarks, the time schedules, and the answer comes back to me and Yes, and in some cases, exceeding. I have been down to Boca Chica. It is a sight to behold. How they are putting those Starships together and then the big booster. And their plan is that they're going to do a few test flights there. And once they have the confidence, they will bring the missions to the Cape, and until they get their permanent pad on the Cape, they will launch from the one that they are constructing right now, that is in the outer perimeter of Pad 39A. You know, you're developing a new vehicle, a new rocket. You can expect some delays, but thus far I'm told that they are on schedule.
Their plan is to do an uncrewed landing in 23, late 23, that's a year from now! And then to do the crewed landing in late 24. So slips are always possible because, it's a brand new system, but they have been quite impressive in what they have done with other systems.
specifically launch manifests of SpaceX for lunar missions in _2024_ for casual observers like myselfAny causal observer can say with a lot of confidence it ain’t happening in that timeframe. Not even close. Unrealistic
You are talking about FH launches. Nelson refers to crewed missions with Starship.specifically launch manifests of SpaceX for lunar missions in _2024_ for casual observers like myself
specifically Psyche mission is looking at asteroid (mining?)) (not our moon, but )
Europa going to a Jovian moon (Jupiters moon, so...)
Gateway PPE preparing for lunar base (Terra's
Griffin for lunar base
GLS1
GLS2 lunar base stuff
![]()
Rocket Launch Schedule
Next Spaceflight's rocket launch schedule keeps you up to date with rocket launches both past and present.nextspaceflight.com
(SERIOUSLY go see the October 10th launch with landings back at the cape, you see the "homesick angel" streaking, climbing, through the sky, homewards, the "silver seed to a new home in the sky", then 8+ minutes later, returning with sonic booms for another trip)
View attachment 884009
View attachment 884011
OT
for the older farts and geezers
"Gully Foyle is my name
"Terra is my nation
"deep space, my dwelling space
"the stars my destination
(Alfred Bester)
you are correct. If you look at launch schedules you will notice the FH is the one on the schedules at presentYou are talking about FH launches. Nelson refers to crewed missions with Starship.
I have no idea what those FH launches have to do with NASA planning to use Starship — a vehicle which has not yet achieved orbit — to take astronauts to and from the lunar surface.pecifically launch manifests of SpaceX for lunar missions in _2024_ for casual observers like myself
specifically Psyche mission is looking at asteroid (mining?)) (not our moon, but )
Europa going to a Jovian moon (Jupiters moon, so...)
Gateway PPE preparing for lunar base (Terra's
Griffin for lunar base
GLS1
GLS2 lunar base stuff
Of course a NASA administrator knows more about Starship development and Artemis progress than those on this forum do. But we do know that NASA has been making very optimistic statements about a crewed lunar landing for years now, given that Starship has yet to reach orbit — and then will require in-orbit refueling, which has never been done before — and that the spacesuits that astronauts will need to use on the Moon do not currently exist (and are being designed and built by a company, Axiom, that has never made anything like that before).you are correct. If you look at launch schedules you will notice the FH is the one on the schedules at present
presently there are 2 Starships on launch schedules, although obviously more can be added as time passes, first in a month or so
(Road trip to Boca Chica anyone?)
next 2 years out, so lots of gaps to fil in those 23 months, eh.
Perhaps Nelson is privy to more info than we are aware of
+1I have no idea what those FH launches have to do with NASA planning to use Starship — a vehicle which has not yet achieved orbit — to take astronauts to and from the lunar surface.
I realize this is wildly conspiratorial, but the only reason I can think of is that NASA can then say that SpaceX is "late." That would make their "Moon Vehicle" SLS and Artemis look better. Of course, Mister Optimism on timelines, Elon, may have said that SpaceX could do it and Nelson is just repeating it.SpaceX Plans To Land Starship On The Moon In 2023 Says NASA Administrator
Nelson says the plan is to have an uncrewed Starship land on the Moon a year from now, and then do a crewed landing late 2024. What is he smoking…
+1I realize this is wildly conspiratorial, but the only reason I can think of is that NASA can then say that SpaceX is "late." That would make their "Moon Vehicle" SLS and Artemis look better. Of course, Mister Optimism on timelines, Elon, may have said that SpaceX could do it and Nelson is just repeating it.
Test configuration is totally different from the real thing though.Hmmm. They need to fix that problem. Otherwise this isn’t launching