Legacy Model S and X say hiI can only think that it's again a legacy thing of planned obsolescence or they are just unable to do so due to the disconnection between the hardware and software or a disconnection across departments. Seems a bit narrow minded but I suppose if most people are financing these things short term than this must be the market they are looking at
Yes. Removes one of my 4 issues with it - range. That leaves the software, combined with the Tesla eco system, which perhaps I could live with. But even the Turismo is short of the interior space that I need, the MS being our family / utility car. I cannot believe how small the Taycan is inside, for such a large car.So, new Tacan is out. Great bit of kit imho albeit still cant tow I would of thought hence the Macan would be my choice (on the surface and not digging in deep).
I wonder, being that the previous version hasn't been out that long, I wonder how much of the new software features have carried over to the previous model (if any)
This doesn't come up enough and I'd not really noticed this fully until I took my wife's Model 3 Performance into a multi-storey car park and had to really swing out and then turn with full lock to make it up and down the ramps. For a car of its size, in that carpark it could barely do it and I've had cars that are bigger and longer that had less issues. It's extremely poor the turning circle and hoping the Highland is noticeably better but not checked the stats on it.
It's worse. Old M3 was 11.6m kerb to kerb, M3H is 11.7m.
Full context of what you said:
Yes, now the same a MS, but better than Y or X. But don’t feel too bad. My McLaren is 12.5 m. Has to do with the complexity of suspension which gives amazing precision and turn in (the Mac not the M3
)Not watched this but my brother has a Kona. Pre-heatpump model so drives around sometimes with a thick coat on and his kids in cryostasis in the back to save on range but outside of the heating take a bit of a chunk out of the range, it's remarkably efficient. It certainly uses less energy than our Model 3 Performance does and probably not far off a Model 3 Long Range. For the price, a very good car I think.
You can probably forgive it in a McLaren as you probably aren't taking it into a multi-storey or for a shop down at Lidi where it might be a bit tight to parkYes, now the same a MS, but better than Y or X. But don’t feel too bad. My McLaren is 12.5 m. Has to do with the complexity of suspension which gives amazing precision and turn in (the Mac not the M3
Test drove the Kona with/for the Mrs - we were impressed with it. Would defo consider it if the need arises
