AnxietyRanger
Well-Known Member
Obviously you're referring to me.
You might want to read what I wrote again. I defended no one, nor did I agree with anyone. What I asked for was for response to be made without putting other people down. And of course, you knew that.
Overall I refer to you and the moderator that commented on the matter, which now seems to be a deleted message?
I guess my problem is, I would have expected people to react more strongly to the objectionable thing flathillll expressed, which IMO made concentrating on the details of the response seem pointless in comparison. Chastising wk057 for his style of objecting, when the cause for objecting was great, IMO sends a wrong message. I would have expected a stern response to flathillll instead, who was suggesting we support Tesla in providing false specs to the market.
I get it that you disagree, but once again these are the kind of things that make me have the views that I have about TMC. It leaves open the feeling that if flathillll would have expressed something negative about Tesla, no such support would have materialized. I have seen far worse replies to comments on Tesla go unchecked, if those comments being replied to have been negative of Tesla. flathillll here was defending Tesla and was defended from implied mockery, even though he made an absolutely outrageous comment. If there is no such causality, then fine, but just FYI what it looks like.