You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
We are all speculating, so in general a lot of things could be plausible. However, given the conversation Elon Musk had with Andrea James during the ER, expanding production by increasing output per the square foot of the GF building is unlikely, as they specifically discussed availability of additional space at the GF Site to expand the building and production because of surprisingly strong stationary storage demand.
I think they are more likely planning for increase of the final building size, and this might require re-calibration of the construction phasing and/or size and quantity of the building sections.
Sorry, pmadflyer, I didn't mean to steal your thunder. Props to you for first noticing the removal of the structure in section 5!Hey. I was the first person to mention it in the main GF (non-investors) thread. Thanks for making the image though.
No, it looks pretty clear to me. I've removed the white borders in the image below to make it more clear.
Seams reasonable enough. Now roofing has been completed on section 1 as labeled in previous posts. More concrete work has been done on section 2-3.. Think its possible they expand the factory by a couple of sections in the future. their site it huge, they will have plenty of land to do it!
Elon just said at the shareholders meeting that production of cells start in the middle of next year.
Previously, it was toward end of 2016.
I also had q1 2016 in my head but don't recall the source.
We are now preparing our supply chain and production teams to startvolume builds on these new products in Q3. Production will begin at theTesla Factory in Fremont, and in Q1 2016 will expand into theGigafactory and accelerate significantly.
Q1 Shareholder Letter said:We are now preparing our supply chain and production teams to start volume builds on these new products in Q3. Production will begin at theTesla Factory in Fremont, and in Q1 2016 will expand into the Gigafactory and accelerate significantly.
I think what he meant was that Q1 2016 they will start final stages of gearing up in Phase 1 of Gigfactory 1 in order to start production soon after.
Edit: Scratch that, I misread the quote. It is saying Powerwall/Powerpack production starting Q3 2015, then moving to Gigafactory Q1 2016. Seems odd for the timeline to shift by that much in such a short time, but I'd be more inclined to think one was a mistake or miscommunication than that the underlying schedule had changed that much.
Remember that cell production, at the Gigafactory, does not need to happen for pack production to start. I took this to mean that Powerwall/Powerpack production equipment will be operational in the Gigafactory in Q1 2016. They will use Panasonic sourced cells, from Japan, until Gigafactory cell production comes online later. So they will need to split the cell supply between Fremont and Gigafactory for awhile.
Hi,
The powerpacks are very similar to the automobile packs. JB said that their profit margin on powerpacks (priced at $250 per kWh) assembled in fremont is about 20%. He then said that the profit margin on powerpacks produced at the GF will be a little better. Two things will reduce the price substantially, economies of scale, "at least 30%", and cells with increased energy density. So packs assembled in fremont cost tesla about $200 per kWh, and with full GF economies of scale, a maximum of $140 per kWh!
Does anyone know at what point the GF is supposed to reach either full or substantial economies of scale? Because maximum price of $140 per kWh, in addition to looking really good for M3 pricing also looks really good for either MS and MX margins, or price reductions.
The problem that drastically superior solid state cells pose for the GF, is that the production process is different as compared to current lithium cells.
Hi,
The powerpacks are very similar to the automobile packs. JB said that their profit margin on powerpacks (priced at $250 per kWh) assembled in fremont is about 20%. He then said that the profit margin on powerpacks produced at the GF will be a little better. Two things will reduce the price substantially, economies of scale, "at least 30%", and cells with increased energy density. So packs assembled in fremont cost tesla about $200 per kWh, and with full GF economies of scale, a maximum of $140 per kWh!
Does anyone know at what point the GF is supposed to reach either full or substantial economies of scale? Because maximum price of $140 per kWh, in addition to looking really good for M3 pricing also looks really good for either MS and MX margins, or price reductions.
The problem that drastically superior solid state cells pose for the GF, is that the production process is different as compared to current lithium cells.
How about an update on the rail link? Can anyone confirm the "end of the line" is still at where the arrow points too? I don't know if that route is certain. Or would they branch off the main line from the north?
View attachment 84110
Google Maps
Where and when did JB say this? Do you have a link?
Where and when did JB say this? Do you have a link?
At $100 per kWh, cars like the Nissan Leaf and VW e-Golf with 200-mile range will hit price point of $20,000 before government subsidies. At that point the utility industry will be completely transformed as well. Pretty amazing.