You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I think the actual objection to the original "news" article is that its 8 month old new being resurrected for no reason.
I think it's more like the prof putting all of the grades together in a single spreadsheet, Tesla saying, "we got the best A in any test ever at the school", and the prof then saying "WHOA there Sparky! All those grades from all those tests and all those years are not directly comparable even though I dumped them into the same spreadsheet and didn't do anything in the spreadsheet to indicate that they are not directly comparable."More like Tesla is saying, "we got the best A in any test ever at the school", and the prof is saying, "WHOA there Sparky! All those grades from all those tests and all those years are not directly comparable."
I think it's more like the prof putting all of the grades together in a single spreadsheet, Tesla saying, "we got the best A in any test ever at the school", and the prof then saying "WHOA there Sparky! All those grades from all those tests and all those years are not directly comparable even though I dumped them into the same spreadsheet and didn't do anything in the spreadsheet to indicate that they are not directly comparable."
FWIW, here's the spreadsheet...
Regulations.gov
My opinion is that if NHTSA doesn't want Tesla using their data that compares the VSS across vehicle classes then the NHTSA needs to break up that spreadsheet by vehicle class.
If that is the point then how do you explain 5 star ratings that ignore relative weight ?The NHTSA makes a very straight-forward claim that it’s inappropriate for an automaker to make broad statements about a vehicle’s relative safety using the NHTSA crash test scores because those tests don’t appropriately factor in the effects of vehicle weight in a vehicle-to-vehicle crash. From a technical standpoint, I don’t see how anyone could disagree with this in good faith.
Everyone complaining about anti-Tesla bias should read the actual letter.
The NHTSA makes a very straight-forward claim that it’s inappropriate for an automaker to make broad statements about a vehicle’s relative safety using the NHTSA crash test scores because those tests don’t appropriately factor in the effects of vehicle weight in a vehicle-to-vehicle crash. From a technical standpoint, I don’t see how anyone could disagree with this in good faith.
The rules about what automakers can/can’t say about NHTSA test results in public statements/advertisements are what they are, and they exist the make sure the public isn’t misled. But Tesla’s all like...
Incredibly, tests have scores measured primarily as a percentage which means that some A's are better than others! Some might be 86% and some might be 100%! They are all A's but not all A's are equal. Just like all 5-star safety ratings aren't equal; there's an underlying measurement system that grades where they are within that 5-star rating, called probability of injury (among other things).Right, because per the test results, their A was better.
It's Tesla saying, "We got a 99.5% on the exam! Highest score in the class baybee!"
And the professor is saying, "It's an A, nothing more, nothing less. 10 other kids got A's too."
Tesla says, "But my A was better!"
This is really old news (October 2018) dredged up again. What else would you expect from CNBC?
I do agree with Tesla's response below, but not sure if they can keep saying "safest"
https://www.plainsite.org/documents/fnrhg/tesla-nhtsa-foia-response/
FWIW, here's the spreadsheet...
Regulations.gov
My opinion is that if NHTSA doesn't want Tesla using their data that compares the VSS across vehicle classes then the NHTSA needs to break up that spreadsheet by vehicle class.
No. It factors in the RESULTS of a crash test. I don't care WHY my car is safer, I care that it IS safer and by ANY metric, Tesla's are the safest cars on the road....
but why the AWD #NUM! error?
19-Sep Tesla Model 3 RWD 2018 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 0.38 5
19-Sep Tesla Model 3 AWD 2018 #NUM! #NUM! #NUM! 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 #NUM! #NUM!
Tesla's assertion is based on non-publicly released data.
That is not the point at all, unfortunately.Ok, I wasted 20 mins of my life trying to navigate the NHTSA site to find some actual rating of vehicles in this class, and I'm at a loss as to how you're supposed to derive actual comparison data, but could be me. So, in it's class, which cars offer a superior crash test rating? Isn't this the entire point? Which car can I buy today (in my class) that is the safest choice????
Tesla claimed that the 3 was the safest based on the 3 having the best VSS score of any car tested, not the 3 scoring better on every single part of every single test that the VSS is based off of.The above is certainly interesting, particularly since the data in that XLS does not support Tesla's claim that Model 3 is the "best ever".
Not for Side MDB or Side Pole tests!
Yes for Rollover and Front, but only based on the 2018 test data sample.
I don't know where to find the results of 2017 and earlier years that would include all the cars with which Model 3 actually competes in the marketplace (3-Series, C-class, A4, Arteon, vs. X1, GLC, Q5, Atlas).