You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I think there is opportunity for Tesla to create 10 yr auto loans. Tesla vehicle time value is going to be better than most boats on 10 yr loans. Especially CyberTruck where the SS body doesn't rust out. Existing Demand doesn't warrant this, but it's an ace still.In 1919 the tiny General Motors could not compete directly with the giant Ford. So, they founded a thing called General Motors Acceptance Corporation that financed dealers, their inventory and the end consumers fo their products. Suddenly they had dealers everywhere who could have inventory and customers who could pay in installments. It worked. Ford took until 1956 to follow GM's then insurmountable lead.
In 1932 US families could not afford the new electric refrigerators and the other electrical appliances General Electric made. Electricity was rapidly being extended even in semi-rural areas. So General Electric Contracts Corporation was formed to support dealers and consumers of GE products. At the time very few banks would entertain such loans.
Baby steps, Tesla tends to partner with someone who is experienced first, and learn from them.Tesla has no insurance underwriting operations right now. They are simply brokering insurance policies to an underwriter sub. In California at least, Markel Insurance Company has done the underwriting for all of the policies.
To actually underwrite the policies, Tesla would need to massively rework their operations compared to how it's been rolled out so far. For now, Markel seems content to take the risk to insure Tesla vehicles.
In Texas, the policies are underwritten by Redpoint County Mutual Insurance. In Illinois, they'll be underwritten by a subsidiary of American Family Mutual.
EDIT - source
The bear thesis of "more competition" is stupid because it assumes a fixed size market rather than a growing one. Competition didn't seem to kill Apple and the iPhone. If anything, competition has made Tesla look even better in comparison.
I personally believe some automakers have been hiding behind the chip shortages to cover poor sales. So, while other manufacturers could pay up front, if they’re using it as cover, they likely would not choose this route...Well it's Reuters. These days that's not worth the pixels on the screen.
Paying in advance? Sure, gotta wonder though if it was that easy wouldn't most companies be able to do that? I'm sure Ford et all could find a few hundred millions or something in their couches if they needed to avoid closing factories.
Wouldn't buying their own plant be a medium/long time solution to an immediate problem. Would also likely be at an inflated price considering they are all making more money than ever. Why would anyone sell a producing factory unless you overpay?
Seems more likely to try to get ahead in the line by investing in/buying a small part of a company which needs even more cash to build more plants in exchange for skipping the line at current plants. If such a company exist.
Around here Gordo is “legendary“....I tried looking up the 74 year old "legendary" investor's net worth and found two answers:
$2-$6 million
and, drumroll...
$200,000
Hmmm...he must be one of those "legendary investors" with a lot of expensive divorces!
Amazing!Perfectly normal SP movement this morning.
The invisible hand of the market is working just fine/s
The senator mis-spoke....Someone should inform Republican Senator John Cornyn of Texas that there is a factory currently under construction in his state that could supply some jobs ...
DUR DUR DUR.. DING DING DING
If all 70 million of annual global car sales could only be EV's - Tesla would sell 50 million or more.
Whom controls the batteries (and battery prices), controls the one ring.
the union will control labor negotiations and Tesla will remove stock options from the compensation package.
From the union point of view, there are shareholders, management, and workers. If the workers become shareholders the power of the union is reduced. No doubt the union does not want stock options for this reason.Neither Tesla nor Elon has said this was the case. In fact Elon refuted this specific accusation.
Whether that happens because the union, such as the UAW opts for fighting for wages instead of stock compensation is another matter. But Tesla has not threatened to do this.
GM has used up all their credits. Nissan must be close.
This is another example of people tolerating things that are wrong. There should be ZERO appetite for the extra $2,500 tied to ”union production“. How does this benefit the taxpayers, EV adopters, workers,or anyone?
Neither Tesla nor Elon has said this was the case. In fact Elon refuted this specific accusation.
Tesla. Is there another non-Tesla non-union EV manufacturer that won’t have access to the extra $2,500? I think this aims SQUARELY at Tesla
Didn't Rob commented that there were drone shots confirming the 2 week shut down? And who to say the entire 2 weeks were all in April?Lol, ramping at +100% month-over-month? They're fast, but not THAT fast!
The limiting factor on production is ALWAYS logistics, specifically meaning the supply of pre-ordered parts from literally 100's of external suppliers. Tesla can not increase this supply on a whim, or in big, unplanned jumps (because PHYSICS).
Giga Shanghai produced almost exactly the same number of Models Y per day in April as they did in March. This is the sensible result given a pre-ordered supply of external parts.
The only reasonable way Tesla had a 2weak shdn AND still produced the same number of Models Y is if they went to double shifts for the other 2wks of Apr. Possible, but we have no evidence of that either.
Its the same way we have no evidence of a 2weak shtdn. What's more reasonable? Information leaks after the fact about a supposed shdn, but DOES NOT about double shifts? Or that it was production as planned the whole time?
The only unreasonable position is that April had lower prod. (as the April Fool's FUD campaign wanted investors to believe). Shipments to S. Korea explains the discrepency completely. In fact, we learned today that April 2021 MiC Model Y production was normal.
We rightfully should discount post-hoc justifcations of media FUD via unsubstantiated, single-sourced, and RETROACTIVE stories (which were clearly aimed at shoring up a disintegrating FUD narrative). It's what long-term investors do.
Cheers!
Baby steps, Tesla tends to partner with someone who is experienced first, and learn from them.
If they can keep up with Tesla’s pace of innovation, then fine, they don’t kick out vendors just to squeeze profits.
But if they can not, Tesla will do it themselves, in a completely different and better way.
This happened many times in key areas and will happen more as they identify new key areas.
Agree 100%.This is another example of people tolerating things that are wrong. There should be ZERO appetite for the extra $2,500 tied to ”union production“. How does this benefit the taxpayers, EV adopters, workers,or anyone? Tesla workers are able to unionize any time they want. In doing so, the union will control labor negotiations and Tesla will remove stock options from the compensation package. Since the production workers feel compensated very well, they have not chosen to unionize and, likely, reduce their overall compensation. Good job, Tesla. Is there another non-Tesla non-union EV manufacturer that won’t have access to the extra $2,500? I think this aims SQUARELY at Tesla. How does invalidating $2,500 of EV rebate help taxpayers, buyers, or workers here? The only beneficiary appears to be the UAW at the expense of everyone else, including the production workers that have chosen not to unionize. This is unacceptable and should not be ignored just because Tesla gets “something“.
It is not Tesla that would deny stock options to a UAW union employee: none of their workers are permitted to receive stock options by Union policy (lame, yet true).the union will control labor negotiations and Tesla will remove stock options from the compensation package.
Elon has thusfar ignored said order and tweet is still there. Back when it was originally made they denied it was any sort of threat as the NLRB reads it.
It is not Tesla that would deny stock options to a UAW union employee: it is UAW policy that none of their workers are permitted to receive stock options by Union policy (lame, yet true).
UAW Spokesperson said:The UAW does not have a policy preventing employees from owning stock options