$450 PT at Jefferies:
Tesla (TSLA) Given a $450.00 Price Target by Jefferies Financial Group Analysts
Tesla (TSLA) Given a $450.00 Price Target by Jefferies Financial Group Analysts
-
Want to remove ads? Register an account and login to see fewer ads, and become a Supporting Member to remove almost all ads.
Tesla, TSLA & the Investment World: the Perpetual Investors' Roundtable
- Thread starter AudubonB
- Start date
Of course, the correct answer is "Full Plaid"
We have this May woman that you're very welcome to take...
dc_h
Active Member
shlokavica22
Member
What is the "worst case scenario" ruling that the judge can issue in your opinion?
If we assume Elon is removed as CEO, who says he can't appoint (obviously with board approval, etc) his brother as such and effectively be a CEO in a shadow mode?
What I'm getting to is- he is the major shareholder after all. Are we supposed to be "panicked" at all (when the major outlook is long term)?
So I guess the feasibility of GA first with imported bodies comes down to which portions (stamping, component supplier, GA equipment supplier) have the most ability to pull in timing (maybe press is ready to go..). Based on that offset timing, tariffs, and custom equipment, is the stagger cost effective.
For instance, If the parts suppliers were also planning for start of Q4 for production, ramping to 3k/wk, then a early GA line would not have parts to use. Even if they could more one one quarter ahead, that is sub 10k cars worth of production. Which means ~3k SDK carriers needed (reusable) or 10k one time use.
Say 10k cars additional, at 10% margin on a 30k car, that is only $30 million total offset by shipping/ dunnage/ transport.
I wouldn’t worry about Elon losing a title. He’s already stated publicly he became “the nothing of tesla” and nothing happened. As long as he owns the most stock I think he’ll be calling the shots. Not unlike an underground government except as the nothing of tesla he’ll probably be able to tweet at will.
Her brief is to defame and smear Musk and Tesla, to depress the stock price. She doesn't care how she looks.
I wouldn't be worried about Elon losing the CEO position or stepping down, so long as he is replaced by an insider like Jerome or JB who understand the urgency of Tesla's mission. I'm sure Elon would still lead engineering, vision and product roadmap and still have a lot of influence over strategy.
Don TLR
Active Member
This is what the shorts seem to forget, it's so much more than a car company..
Hide your phone in the toilet beforehand and drink lots of water...
X Fan
Active Member
All new UK cars to have speed limiters by 2022 under EU plans
Wow....saw this on Guardian today.
EU proposes to control vehicles speeds by 2022.
That could hurt Tesla sales.
Wow....saw this on Guardian today.
EU proposes to control vehicles speeds by 2022.
That could hurt Tesla sales.
What are the chance of Tesla doing battery cell production in the future? Have Elon ever hinted at that?
I think that the Maxwell deal is all about that. Trying to find better manufacturing technology that makes the entry point into manufacturing less expensive and keep it all in house. Panasonic has been a good partner and should continue to be one but that shouldn't hinder Tesla from also adding their own lines. If they're seriously cell starved now it will only get worse in the future with all the coming products.
I think that the Maxwell deal is all about that. Trying to find better manufacturing technology that makes the entry point into manufacturing less expensive and keep it all in house. Panasonic has been a good partner and should continue to be one but that shouldn't hinder Tesla from also adding their own lines. If they're seriously cell starved now it will only get worse in the future with all the coming products.
How? Tesla cars are already speed limited, they would just have to change the setting for the max speed. Remember, the max speed does not impact the power below that speed. I'd say it would hurt ICE sales far more than Tesla's sales.
Mad@gascar
Teslanaire Extraordinaire
Because the testers couldn't find the tail pipe...
My understanding is that only some of the cells are produced on the Panasonic side, and some of the cells are produced on the Tesla side.
"However, drivers will be able to override the device simply by pushing hard on the accelerator..."
If you read more about the system that's proposed, it's more of a suggestion than enforcement for the speed limit. It can be overridden by... Pressing the accelerator pedal. Or may have an on/off switch allowing the user to simply disable the system altogether.
Don't get too excited about this. This is all about fitting technology to vehicles which makes speed limiting possible and potentially enabling it by default.
BUT the driver can and will be able to override the system. The press, however, like to spin the story so it sounds as though we will all be forced to drive at the speed limit.
Bear in mind that many ICE cars already have this tech fitted. Many owners choose not to use it and that will carry on being the case.
Similar threads
- Locked
- Locked
- Locked
