Electroman
Well-Known Member
I don't get this. Insider trading is when you selectively give information to select people (hhmm.. like WS thugs) who then profit out of that. But if some information is shared to the general public to everyone, then that can be no more considered insider information, and in fact that is more democratic. The current SEC rules seem to favor the former, but claim the later is fraudulent. It doesn't make sense. It should be the opposite.The SEC has responded to Tesla/Elon in the complaint about the subpoenas: https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.501755/gov.uscourts.nysd.501755.78.0.pdf
They aren't going to give up without a fight. (But they do now admit that they issued subpoenas, just private/sealed ones...)
The little guy on the street is generally left in the dark when it is perfectly legitimate to share some piece of material information privately with WS firms. Twitter democratizes information for all retail and institution investors, and so it should be considered the only legal way to disseminate information