I
I'm not sure we can count on Wall Street analyzing the bill and figuring out that Tesla is actually helped by the bill more than others...
We can count on them figuring it out.
Advertising that fact not so much.
But what else is new?
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I
I'm not sure we can count on Wall Street analyzing the bill and figuring out that Tesla is actually helped by the bill more than others...
The slidedeck says Robotaxi & Others:A question, has there been any communication from Elon/Tesla about a possible $25,000 Tesla model?
I think this issue came up after battery day only because there was a model in the presentation with a cloth draped over it, so the cheaper model became speculation. I do remember Elon saying a few years ago that there would not be a cheaper model to the Model 3 as autonomy would mean the Model 3 would pay for itself. He could have just said that to prevent the Osborne effect
Strategically, it would make sense if Tesla used a smaller model as a robotaxi only, and operate the fleet themselves (or with fleet partners). I dont want Tesla selling small robotaxis to people at $25k-$40k unless they are going to take 30% of the robotaxi receipts a la Apple store
It's just a bailout without being officially labeled as a bailout. Since Ford is not making money on selling the Mustang Mach-e and I would guess that GM is in the same situation they need something to help keep them from failing. Tesla being the most American made cars should be able to navigate the EV bill's requirements easily to take full advantage of the tax credit to continue industry leading margins.
Yes, the bill is a waste of tax payer dollars (and so are PLENTY of other things) but it is unfortunately needed so that Legacy US Auto doesn't fail and can slowly transition to EVs without going out of business or being bought by the Chinese.
What is this $25k Tesla model that fake newsed its way into existence?FactChecking said:
The new EV credits in the US benefit Tesla in all product segments:
- Model S/X pricing improves by $7,500 over Porsche, Lucid & Rivian, which lose the old credit.
- Current & planned Chinese EVs imported into the US lose $7,500 pricing vs. domestically assembled Teslas.
- Lower trims of the Model 3 will fit into the $55,000 cap once the inflationary spike recedes.
- Primary competitors of the Cybertruck (Ford, Rivian) have trims above $80,000 & the Cybertruck much less expensive to produce due to its exoskeleton design & Gigacast underbody.
- $25,000 Tesla model will benefit most from the $55,000 price cap for compact sedans.
- The $55,000 & $80,000 EV credit price caps fundamentally benefit the market leading EV maker with the largest scale & the highest efficiency: Tesla.
Too late.Get your shares under $900 while you still can, folks!
What is this $25k Tesla model that fake newsed its way into existence?
Ford can probably ask for it to be reclassed for the 2023 model year... Unless there is a technical reason it was classed as such, like because it is smaller?The Mustang Mach E can only qualify for the tax credit if it's under $55,000, while the Tesla Model Y has to be under $80,000.
Why?
The EPA classifies the Mustang Mach E as a station wagon. All cars that are not an SUV, Truck, or Van get a $55,000 cap.
In that case, on his part that was a Syriasacusation.That’s funny because I’m from Syracuse.
Most bizarre move of the day - Rivian up 8% after the EV bill pass which completely screws it over lol. You can't make this stuff upIn other news, meme stocks are short squeezing again. AmC and bbby leading the charge
Meanwhile TSLA has already started it's process of being walked down. I doubt we even end up 2X the NasdaqI guess Rivian and Lucid figured out a way to get the tax credit for their customers, as they’re up +8% and almost +7%, respectively.
Can Ford just get a reclassification by just asking? I would think there are solid technical definitions for the classifications. It may be that the Mach E doesn't have enough ground clearance to be classified as an SUV.Ford can probably ask for it to be reclassed for the 2023 model year... Unless there is a technical reason it was classed as such, like because it is smaller?