Much digital ink has been spilled regarding the ability of raw materials extracted from various sources worldwide to enable qualification for the tax credit. Very little discussion has been had regarding the second part of the requirement:
(1) CRITICAL MINERALS REQUIREMENT.— ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—The requirement described in this subparagraph with respect to a vehicle is that, with respect to the battery from which the electric motor of such vehicle draws electricity, the percentage of the value of the applicable critical minerals (as defined in section 45X(c)(6)) contained in such battery that were—
‘‘(i) extracted or processed— ‘‘
(I) in the United States, or
(II) in any country with which 18 the United States has a free trade 19 agreement in effect, or 20‘‘
(ii) recycled in North America
How much processing will be required to qualify for this credit? Will processing of the raw chemicals into cathode be enough to qualify? It looks like the Secretary of Energy will propagate instructions as to what is required and that manufacturers will certify compliance, so we will need to wait quite a while to understand exactly what is required, but it would seem to me that processing from nickel, cobalt, aluminum and manganese to NMC or NCA cathodes would meet the guidelines for this credit regardless of the point of origin (excluding ores mined in China, etc.).
Tesla's cathode plants (under construction at the moment) could be a significant advantage. Also, with 4680 production and pack assembly done in house Tesla has an additional advantage.
As far as Anode goes, the best info I could find stated that approximately 20% of the battery materials value is anode, and that roughly 80% of anode comes from Chinese and Japanese processing, neither of which are in the Free Trade Agreement group. Novonix out of Tennessee is looking quite interesting as a domestic anode manufacturer and has Jeff Dahn as an advisor, so a potential connection to Tesla exists already.