Welcome to Tesla Motors Club
Discuss Tesla's Model S, Model 3, Model X, Model Y, Cybertruck, Roadster and More.
Register

Tesla, TSLA & the Investment World: the Perpetual Investors' Roundtable

This site may earn commission on affiliate links.
U.S. Marines did exactly that for their outposts in Afghanistan. Not only cheaper, but fewer dead truck drivers in the fuel convoys, too.

Bonus.
Yes. During this perod I designed, built, tested & supplied some specialist bespoke systems, pre built, for heli deployment to veerry remote locations for [REDACTED]. They worked. Zero fossils, 100% energy uptime 24 x 365. No people on site. Mission delivered.

(It takes a lot to get that client to shop outside their own country for products and services. They came to us to satisfy their UoR. We even wrote our own bespoke design software. They paid upfront - which their finance department hated, but we insisted. I can comfortably say that at that time, we were the world leaders in that sort of system. )
 
Last edited:
View attachment 853351

Doesn't say anything about a 100,000 cars in this tweet by Elon and I don't remember him ever announcing a change in percentage that also mentioned 100,000.

I'm saying he just announces the minimum score and then his team adds more people.

I'm thinking you are misinterpreting his tweet and I'm supprised you can use the logic of it being dropped to 95 while you don't have it at 98% without applying to others having a score above 80 that won't get FSD when the minimum score switches to 80%. Shouldn't the same logic carry over no matter the new score required to get in?
You may be correct but I didn't read his tweet to mean that they would still be selective with scores above 80%.
We'll know shortly once it rolls out.
 
[*]that those entities will need to cover those short shares over the next 12 trading sessions, decreasing supply of TSLA, and resulting in a higher equilibrium SP.


How does this reconcile with your years-long claims here that MMs never have to cover naked shorts unless there's a stock dividend, because the Madoff exception lets them just keep passing those FTDs among themselves?
 
10.69.2.1 started rolling out to employees early this morning:


I'm hopeful this means we will get the expansion of FSD Beta to 80+ scores well within this quarter.
Well, I have FSD and have not tried to use it since I am too chicken and my wife is scared of phantom braking.
The release that I really want is 2022.24 when I can move the blind spot up on the screen, and I don’t understand why this release is not being rolled out. Anyone knows when this will be more widely available? Thanks!
 
I’ve never been a dealer or an F&I person.

All of the items you state depend on the vehicle having a certain value of x at a certain time after the sale.

Since I’m not a subject matter expert, my “gut” tells me that there is a musical chairs scenario about to happen and someone, somewhere is underwriting a risk that will not have any value 36 months after Dec 2023.
You're correct. There are always such cases.
BMW allegedly lost >$14000 per lease return on the first generation 7 series, the E23. In 2001 they introduced the iDrive which was a disaster.
Then Nissan allegedly made an offer 'no money, no credit, no problem' offer that had predictable losses.
Later when GM introduced the Buick Reatta there were almost no buyers so nearly all of them were leased with repurchase agreements to Alamo car rental.
There are large numbers of such cases, mostly not very much publicized outside auto industry.
The same thing happens with aircraft, recently a B747 with less than 100 hours total time was scrapped, and a number of Airbus A380 have been scrapped.
Clearly, when manufacturers miss the mark the results are predictable.

Generically ICE is not quite analogous. Probably that is more like, say, the Ford Model A or the Douglas DC 3. Those were huge successes, even transformative perhaps, but when they were superseded they just kept operating and kept gradually reducing in numbers, with value gradually diminishing too. The ICE fleet si so huge and there is such a 'slow' rate of acceptance when compared with total global market size that I cannot agree that the ICE market will collapse.

That said, there will be am increasing number of places such as Norway and California that will have fewer ICE on the roads than BEV within the next decade. There will be other that will not.

Prediction of total collapse for ICE is analogous with cellular telephone replacement of land lines or telephone replacing telegraph and telex. Perhaps we might think of oil replacing coal. Nearly ever major upheaval is dramatic in terms for market growth, but much slower in mass displacement of older technology. Even the industrial revolution took many decades forms adoption of railroads and sewing machines, although in retrospect we tend to minimize the actual time used for mass adoption.

I am confident that we all know and understand the direction needed for mass adoption of BEV. The fundamental question is whether this will be like Krakatoa or huge asteroid arrival that triggered mass extinction events.

World infrastructure is somewhat resistant to rapid change. A question is how to define 'rapid'.
 
Well, I have FSD and have not tried to use it since I am too chicken and my wife is scared of phantom braking.
The release that I really want is 2022.24 when I can move the blind spot up on the screen, and I don’t understand why this release is not being rolled out. Anyone knows when this will be more widely available? Thanks!

It seems like Tesla is keeping 10.69.X releases in the 2022.20 branch. So we may need to wait for FSD to enter the mainstream code branches before new features get merged. Elon's hopeful that will be before the end of this year.

As I guessed earlier, it seems like Tesla was holding back most FSD Beta queue participants on 2022.20 branches so they don't need to roll back people on .24 or .28. Chuck Cook ran a poll on Twitter:


If the ratio of 2022.20 to 2022.24+28 is roughly equal to how many people have scores 80+, maybe 2/3rds of the remaining FSD Beta queue will be added soon.
 
You're correct. There are always such cases.
BMW allegedly lost >$14000 per lease return on the first generation 7 series, the E23. In 2001 they introduced the iDrive which was a disaster.
Then Nissan allegedly made an offer 'no money, no credit, no problem' offer that had predictable losses.
Later when GM introduced the Buick Reatta there were almost no buyers so nearly all of them were leased with repurchase agreements to Alamo car rental.
There are large numbers of such cases, mostly not very much publicized outside auto industry.
The same thing happens with aircraft, recently a B747 with less than 100 hours total time was scrapped, and a number of Airbus A380 have been scrapped.
Clearly, when manufacturers miss the mark the results are predictable.

Generically ICE is not quite analogous. Probably that is more like, say, the Ford Model A or the Douglas DC 3. Those were huge successes, even transformative perhaps, but when they were superseded they just kept operating and kept gradually reducing in numbers, with value gradually diminishing too. The ICE fleet si so huge and there is such a 'slow' rate of acceptance when compared with total global market size that I cannot agree that the ICE market will collapse.

That said, there will be am increasing number of places such as Norway and California that will have fewer ICE on the roads than BEV within the next decade. There will be other that will not.

Prediction of total collapse for ICE is analogous with cellular telephone replacement of land lines or telephone replacing telegraph and telex. Perhaps we might think of oil replacing coal. Nearly ever major upheaval is dramatic in terms for market growth, but much slower in mass displacement of older technology. Even the industrial revolution took many decades forms adoption of railroads and sewing machines, although in retrospect we tend to minimize the actual time used for mass adoption.

I am confident that we all know and understand the direction needed for mass adoption of BEV. The fundamental question is whether this will be like Krakatoa or huge asteroid arrival that triggered mass extinction events.

World infrastructure is somewhat resistant to rapid change. A question is how to define 'rapid'.
I suspect the decline of ICE will be largely influenced by what governments decide to do with gas tax. As EVs displace ICE, demand for gas will ease along with gas prices. Cheap gas could keep used ICE around for a long time. Governments may choose to impose a higher “vice” tax on gas like they do with cigarettes.
 
Well, I have FSD and have not tried to use it since I am too chicken and my wife is scared of phantom braking.
The release that I really want is 2022.24 when I can move the blind spot up on the screen, and I don’t understand why this release is not being rolled out. Anyone knows when this will be more widely available? Thanks!
I have 70,000 mi on my model 3 and have only had phantom breaking two times in all that time.
 
Tomorrow is the last day to put in your claim for some of the money that Elon paid to the SEC to get them off his back over his "funding secured" tweet.

My post with details on eligibility and the claim process is #344,744

I submitted my claim online. Not a great experience. Once successfully submitted they give you a claim number. But they don't actually e-mail or text you confirmation, so there's really no evidence you submitted a claim. I eventually called them and they admitted they had my claim. I don't expect much from this.

Anybody else here file a claim?
I filed a claim for 181 shares purchased @ a little over $375 per share during the qualifying period.

Sent the paperwork via Canada Post with tracking on August 16th. Figured that would be lots of time, but wanted the tracking to be sure it was received.

As of today, September 17th, which is the deadline, Canada post tracking shows my package as "Item delayed" and "In transit". I had been watching the progress of this shipment closely, expecting a week or so for delivery, so after 3 weeks and still seeing the package had not arrived, I knew I had to take further action.

I completed another full set of paperwork to support my claim, and sent it this time via Purolator Courier on Monday this week with guaranteed 2 day delivery. I included a note to the agents indicating this was a second application due to the fact that my original was delayed in transit and did not appear likely to meet the deadline.
Purolator had difficulty entering the address into their system, but we hand-wrote the address exactly as was stated on the application form and highlighted it for the driver. Package was received on Wednesday the 14th.

Instructions on the claim form stipulated that the transaction detail include exact time to the second, for each transaction, and also include time and time zone. I had to get this information from TD as my trade confirmations available online showed only the date, and no time-stamp whatsoever.

When I initially tried the online claim form, it appeared to be US centric, as there was no option for other countries. My only option seemed to be via mail or courier, and as it turned out, I had to use both!

I still have every one of those shares, and of course they are now 2,715 shares after the 2 splits, so what a crazy world where I'm being compensated for "a loss". Less for the shorts who initiated the class action!
 
Probably up around 1,000/week. I'm sure they'd like to hit/exceed that this quarter.
Yeah, Texas plant really seemed to have a bust Q2 with it opening only with the 4680 cells (i.e. tiny production). The equipment to build with the 2170 cells arrived late Q2 so the "real" opening has basically been Q3. Ramp is modest to date....loooooong way to go before they hit anything like Shanghai plant (if ever). What I really want to see is significant quarter over quarter increases and no "stalls" on the output. Q4 2022 and Q1 2023 will be better indicators of ramp for sure. Regardless, it APPEARS neither Berlin or Texas will add materially to the production numbers this year which is disappointing in the short term, but likely immaterial a year or two from now.
 
Yeah, Texas plant really seemed to have a bust Q2 with it opening only with the 4680 cells (i.e. tiny production). The equipment to build with the 2170 cells arrived late Q2 so the "real" opening has basically been Q3. Ramp is modest to date....loooooong way to go before they hit anything like Shanghai plant (if ever). What I really want to see is significant quarter over quarter increases and no "stalls" on the output. Q4 2022 and Q1 2023 will be better indicators of ramp for sure. Regardless, it APPEARS neither Berlin or Texas will add materially to the production numbers this year which is disappointing in the short term, but likely immaterial a year or two from now.
Shanghai hit 1000/week 2.5 months after start of production and 3000/week 3 months after that.

So Texas and Berlin seems to be at similar pace, both being 3 months behind the Shanghai ramp.
 
Shanghai hit 1000/week 2.5 months after start of production and 3000/week 3 months after that.

So Texas and Berlin seems to be at similar pace, both being 3 months behind the Shanghai ramp.

Yeah, this post made me look up the run rate expectations. It's 5k/wk for Berlin by 1Q23 and 5k/wk for Austin by end of year.

Nothing's gonna touch Shanghai in 2023, but these two will be blasting out units in very short order.
 
The Boeing 747 didn't even enter service until 1970, and most of them are a lot newer than that, so hardly ancient. I started flying before the 747 even existed and I doubt you would consider me ancient.
The single remaining Boeing 747-100 SP's in commercial service were those bought new from Boeing in 1978, with two of them delivered in early 1979 (yes, a couple of weeks after the Revolution). The SP's were almost all scrapped within a very few years when the 1983 B747-300 went into service in 1983 and matched the range with hundreds more passengers and vastly reduced fuel consumption.
747-100sp.php
FWIW, I was a passenger in they inaugural PanAm flight Dhahran-JDK and on the IranAir delivery flight in 1978. They did not last long.

Although this subject seems be off-topic the automotive analogies are relevant. Very well designed, efficient and productive ICE will survive a long time. Poorly designed ones will die sooner, much sooner. In that respect poor design will continue to portend failure.

The poor BEV's fate will be similarly short lived. Fro example, no Hummer brand seems to have had durable desirability, and the BEV version will die soon too. When really well designed pure BEV models become widely available in all price and size variants, including commercial vehicles of all types, we'll begin to see the wholesale adoption we all want to find.

Many of those of today will be the Boeing 747-100SP's of motor vehicles. Just as with commercial aircraft, when superior technologies arrive the old ones largely disappear and, yes, the resale prices plummet. For that to happen we need high volumes of superior quality BEV in all types and variety.

Tesla may well continue to be the most profitable OEM and storage provider ten years from now. I certainly hope so. For that to happen we need high quality, high volume competitor urgently. Without them the total market will not develop as quickly as it should do.
 
Yeah, this post made me look up the run rate expectations. It's 5k/wk for Berlin by 1Q23 and 5k/wk for Austin by end of year.

Nothing's gonna touch Shanghai in 2023, but these two will be blasting out units in very short order.
They thought the 4680 cells would be ready, and when they weren't (in volume), a delay ensued. Should ramp faster with the 2170s, since it's known tech. This is also, probably, why they suspended LR Model 3s, so they can use those cells in Austin, and just build more SR+ Model 3s in Fremont.
 
Yeah, Texas plant really seemed to have a bust Q2 with it opening only with the 4680 cells (i.e. tiny production). The equipment to build with the 2170 cells arrived late Q2 so the "real" opening has basically been Q3. Ramp is modest to date....loooooong way to go before they hit anything like Shanghai plant (if ever). What I really want to see is significant quarter over quarter increases and no "stalls" on the output. Q4 2022 and Q1 2023 will be better indicators of ramp for sure. Regardless, it APPEARS neither Berlin or Texas will add materially to the production numbers this year which is disappointing in the short term, but likely immaterial a year or two from now.

For clarification - TX is NOT building 2170 cells. The are building PACKS from 2170 cells that they bring in from GF Nevada.

The floor space for 2170 cells requires WET electrode processes, which is 10X larger and requires a LOT more chemical clean up than the DBE.
 
For that to happen we need high quality, high volume competitor urgently. Without them the total market will not develop as quickly as it should do.
The former part of your post was mostly agreeable, but this part I have to disagree with.

Not because it wouldn't be super beneficial to the planet for Tesla to have great competitors, but because Tesla is not going to be pushed faster by any force other than the established mission.