As bkp_duke points out, there are a great many unknowns (unknown to us, that is) to know if he would need to sell additional TSLA shares to close this deal. Once already he has not only considered additional sales, but gone thru with such a sale, as we all are (painfully) aware. In the vein of my “discuss the middle between the extremes”, I don’t think it’s 0% chance of additional sales, but I don’t think it’s 100% chance either. I wish instead of saying “It will” or “It won’t”, people were discussing what probability they assign it, what size it might be, and most importantly, what can avoid or minimize it. IMHO, any additional investors he can bring into the mix greatly decreases the probability and the potential size. I hope he is calling around.How about a constant narrative for 2-3 weeks now that Elon will have to sell more and the only reason he hasn't yet is because of the earnings trade window?
The speculation is based on current market dynamics vs the environment in which the deal was originally formed, as well as the perceived lower value of the purchased entity due to Musk’s assertion of the bots prevalence. The primary party expressly saying that what is being purchased is a less good asset than what was envisioned would fall in the facts category, and should lead rational investors to consider bailing. The “proof” you ask for is in Musk considering it a sufficiently high likelihood that he himself sold additional shares to help cover investors who are bailing on the deal.How about rampant speculation that investors are bailing on Elon even though there's no proof?
Hopefully all can agree that this is clearly Musk seeing a high risk (certainty?) of at least investors bailing on him. Question is, was his additional sales sufficient, an overshoot, or an undershoot?Or how about Elon clearly stating after he last sold that the sell was intended as backup if the twitter buyout went through AND his investors bailed on him?
I would certainly not assign those two probabilities as equal.It's just as likely at this point that Elon has free cash to buy TSLA shares as much as he has to sell TSLA shares.
Confirmation bias, perhaps - in that, as I consider each of the roles (Musk, cash co-investor, or purchase loan lender), I see some of each of the latter two wanting to decrease or eliminate their planned component as a > 50% probability event (Musk himself wanted to cancel the deal, which would count as eliminating his planned component as well), and I am uncertain whether Musk can cover the gap without taking…non-ideal measures. Hence, hearing unconfirmed reports that he is seeking additional co-investor funds matches my expectation of what would be needed.I don't know how you think a random person on CNBC spreading a rumor that Elon is "frantically" contacting investors to for money without showing ANY PROOF of it is anything but fear mongering FUD.
If it was true, he should back it up without something of substance. He didn't. It's FUD.