Welcome to Tesla Motors Club
Discuss Tesla's Model S, Model 3, Model X, Model Y, Cybertruck, Roadster and More.
Register

Tesla, TSLA & the Investment World: the Perpetual Investors' Roundtable

This site may earn commission on affiliate links.
See the estimated delivery date that Tesla shows when you try to place an order. Almost every model in most major geographies are showing same month delivery (April) or same quarter (April to June) delivery. Nothing is going to Q3. Some of my friends ordered in the last few months, and they all got within a few weeks. There is more than sufficient production now. The issue is demand and that’s why Tesla is forced to cut prices. Tesla is not stupid to cut prices if there was more than enough demand at a particular price point (they will actually increase prices as we have seen before).

I see that it is April - June. Did all your friends order the performance version? They seem to be going quick. June is still a 2 month wait and I am of the opinion that a shorter wait time is better as you lose a lot of sales from people that simply don't want to wait longer than that.

I agree that the wait time has shortened, and I think they will probably lower prices more, but there are still a lot of people who have been waiting months that still haven't received a VIN>
 
Of course. None of this matters for long term investors. We can just acknowledge things haven’t been great since Q3’22 and that’s the reality. No need to be in denial and sugarcoat and paint a rosy picture about the short term. It’s pretty bad and that’s ok. Things will change soon and everything will be awesome again once we get through this challenging period for the next few quarters.
Pretty bad? How many companies would kill for the current growth trajectory of Tesla.

Tesla continues to grow even through these current times of rising interest rates and recession fears.
 
Look, after the big price cuts I have some worries about Tesla’s financials, worries which I expressed yesterday in the quarterly earnings thread. But I received some constructive feedback, which I took to heart and which laid to rest some of my worries. I would suggest the ‘low post members’ who decided to chime in today also keep an open mind. It’s fine to express your doubts, less so to keep hammering away at it all day long.
Do you have a link to the post where you have got feedback. There is no need to segregate low post vs high post. Not everyone had to start their life on TMC in 2012 or before. Plenty of people who maybe new to TMC, but who are just as much capable as some of the TMC veterans. The key is to understand if we are discussing short term topics (quarterly earnings, demand, production, etc) OR if we are discussing long term topics. Almost everyone who truly understands Tesla understands that Tesla is once in a generation company with amazing prospects. That doesn’t mean we need to confuse that with short term topics.
 
There's a clear push and pull here between people who might already be 100% in TSLA and want nothing more than the stock price to go up versus those who might want to understand what could be coming and what opportunities may present themselves in terms of getting in, buying more, etc.

The desire for the stock price relentlessly heading upwards is not the philosophy I buy into and makes me wonder whether some people are just waiting for their opportunity to sell or engage in risky strategies. If you're not selling and are actually in for the long term, I'd be looking for buying opportunities to get even more in and stock price depression is a good thing when we're talking about a company that makes money producing and selling real things rather than functioning as some speculative instrument.

People in here have talked before about Tesla doing buybacks, and yet somehow I think what's being pictured is Tesla doing buybacks at some high valuation to further prop up their holdings so they can... I don't know, sell? Take out loans against it? Not even sure. I'd want the stock price to crater, because then the money being used to buy back stock is returning max value to investors and giving back an even larger portion of equity.

What I would call real investing is looking for the opportunities to get as much equity ownership as possible -- in a company that makes money providing the goods/services the world needs -- for the minimum cost and letting that company return the investment through its operation. That's Graham & Dodd, Buffett, Munger.
 
LOL. I am someone who did a 100x on TSLA and an extremely passionate Tesla advocate. One can be a huge Tesla fan and still live in reality as opposed to fantasy.
Then take your groundbreaking BIZ101 insight to investor relations already. You can email them or just tweet to Martin.
You won't accomplish much for your favorite company by whining here. :)
 
I see that it is April - June. Did all your friends order the performance version? They seem to be going quick. June is still a 2 month wait and I am of the opinion that a shorter wait time is better as you lose a lot of sales from people that simply don't want to wait longer than that.

I agree that the wait time has shortened, and I think they will probably lower prices more, but there are still a lot of people who have been waiting months that still haven't received a VIN>
No, all of them were Model Y LR. No performance models. Once you place an order, the delivery date keeps changing, but we no longer see more than 2-3 months of wait. In some cases, it’s within 2 weeks, and in some cases it could take 2-3 months. But the point is Tesla will not cut prices if demand exceeds production. That’s no longer the case. Production exceeds at demand at current prices, hence the need to cut prices to increase demand.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: cusetownusa
That’s even more of a reason to utilize other platforms like Google search, TV, etc. The idea is to get across the message that Tesla has a far far superior product to everyone. This is what Apple does. Tesla is no longer production constrained. Demand is the issue. And the strategy to solve for demand issues can’t be just cut prices and sacrifice gross margin. Strategic advertising can increase the demand a lot for 1/10 of the cost of price cuts. A 2K price reduction across 1.5M units is $3B loss in revenue.

This is hard to hear for those who can't take critical news, but it's true. And they get A LOT more out of advertising than only price cuts.
 
Do you have a link to the post where you have got feedback. There is no need to segregate low post vs high post. Not everyone had to start their life on TMC in 2012 or before. Plenty of people who maybe new to TMC, but who are just as much capable as some of the TMC veterans. The key is to understand if we are discussing short term topics (quarterly earnings, demand, production, etc) OR if we are discussing long term topics. Almost everyone who truly understands Tesla understands that Tesla is once in a generation company with amazing prospects. That doesn’t mean we need to confuse that with short term topics.

Just read the last page of this thread: Near-future quarterly financial projections.

As for the low post count: unfortunately we have some unpleasant experiences with new or dormant members who suddenly jump in - usually close to earnings - to save us from going down with the sinking TSLA-ship. That in part explains why you are being confronted with skepticism and pushback.
 
*We* acknowledge no such thing and that’s the reality.

No need to make bs up. You’re not talking to members who joined in Sept 2020 and have contributed less than two dozen posts all in the last hour. 🙄 Go peddle your wares some place else. We’re not buying your cheap dollar store junk.
Wow..., maybe be specific about whats wrong then. Why the fanboy attitude..Lol
 
This is hard to hear for those who can't take critical news, but it's true. And they get A LOT more out of advertising than only price cuts.
ye gads, we're being double-teamed!!!

That's it, I'm convinced, folks. They (whoever they are) can have my shares.
Good luck with saving civilization. OH! And thanks for all the fish.

/s?
 

There would be no reason for the M3 to get the yoke, it doesn't have the dash display in front of the driver. Also without steer-by-wire the yoke just isn't as ergonomic to use as it should be. Maybe the Highland M3 has steer-by-wire? If not, a yoke would only hurt sales IMHO, not help them.
 
Do you have a link to the post where you have got feedback. There is no need to segregate low post vs high post. Not everyone had to start their life on TMC in 2012 or before. Plenty of people who maybe new to TMC, but who are just as much capable as some of the TMC veterans. The key is to understand if we are discussing short term topics (quarterly earnings, demand, production, etc) OR if we are discussing long term topics. Almost everyone who truly understands Tesla understands that Tesla is once in a generation company with amazing prospects. That doesn’t mean we need to confuse that with short term topics.
What you are confusing is how pricing and demand works.

Listen up, I'll only explain this once.

You make it appear the only reason Tesla drops vehicle pricing is since at current pricing there is no (or not enough) demand. This is not accurate. Demand for vehicles comes and goes in waves (aka demand bubbles and pockets), geographically and chronologically. Q1 has the lowest demand, but Q4 generally has higher demand. (generally, this isn't set in stone)

Geographically / chronologically demand can also swing with incentives starting, running out or being announced. Think IRA, think incentives that are different per country.

Economic factors (per country/region) also play a big role. Lots of wildfires in California? -> less demand that time. Unstable government or energy crisis? -> possibly less demand.

The list goes on and on.
But you know: over time there is still plenty of demand for all vehicles Tesla produces.

However, if Tesla has to sit around keeping inventory until their production gets sold out at higher pricing, this has financial downsides:
- time between production and delivery should be as short as possible, this way Tesla can receive money from the customer before paying suppliers;
- higher inventory has a cost associated with it, to keep these cars in stock/neat/charged/not degrading/etc
- ...

I think we can agree holding on to built cars carries a cost and risk.

Imagine Tesla has a smart team looking at the numbers and comparing the costs associated with holding on to inventory longer on the one end to dropping prices and increasing immediate demand (I should say: increasing demand even more) so the cars get delivered quicker on the other hand. Nobody disagrees that lowering prices creates more demand, but they do disagree with you that Tesla MUST drop prices or else they cannot sell all their production.

The current inflation/recession fears have created less demand than usual, that may be true. But the second the FED starts cutting rates and the market turns around, their will be more demand. It swings in roundabouts.

By lowering prices and shortening the amount of time between production and delivery, Tesla is:
- decreasing costs of holding on to inventory;
- sticking it to the competition that cannot profitably make BEV's;
- increasing the demand for their vehicles to a much higher degree than their increased production, increasing brand awareness;
- passing on cost savings (due to lower COGS) to the customer;
- receiving a lot of market data regarding demand in different regions and regarding certain models. All this data is considered when making price adjustments (per model, per region, at certain times).

So please don't act like Tesla is worried and dropping prices in the hope to be able to sell their vehicles. They're doing so because the profits are similar but they get a lot smoother delivery process going on, without having to deal with the wave and a lot of "bumps in the road" (demand pockets/bubbles). Clever pricing smooths out a lot of these issues at nearly no cost.

Many are also not considering that since Berlin is ramping, the Berlin models for example can be sold at lower prices in Europe with the same profit, since the transport/import costs from Shanghai to EU are massive compared to production of the same model (Y currently) in the EU. Within 48 hours of rolling of the line the Berlin car can be anywhere in the EU. Shanghai takes weeks and at much higher cost.

TL;DR: stop with the doom and gloom. There is no demand issue. Tesla is just optimizing pricing vs delivery waves/demand per region in a clever way.

And IF somehow Tesla is forced to drop pricing due to not enough demand, this is temporary due to macro-economic issues and the same goes for all other automakers too. This cannot be held against Tesla compared to its competitors.

I said all I have to say on this. Now please don't repeat your arguments without backing it up with facts, not speculation.
 
Do you have a link to the post where you have got feedback. There is no need to segregate low post vs high post. Not everyone had to start their life on TMC in 2012 or before. Plenty of people who maybe new to TMC, but who are just as much capable as some of the TMC veterans. The key is to understand if we are discussing short term topics (quarterly earnings, demand, production, etc) OR if we are discussing long term topics. Almost everyone who truly understands Tesla understands that Tesla is once in a generation company with amazing prospects. That doesn’t mean we need to confuse that with short term topics.
Once in a generation by the very definition tells a person that short term everything is ignorable white noise.

I refer you back to that very specific Q1 (you know it well according to a recent post claiming your TSLA history) where you, obviously, along with Troy and every doubter pounded their fists ‘aha! the sky is falling!’, sold all your TSLA stock, and then had a mess of egg to clean up just three months later because you all didn’t actually know squat nor believe the message you’re currently peddling about Tesla being a once in a generation blah, blah, blah lip service.

As a 2012 member you can go through the archives and note I’ve been consistently saying the whole time: Tesla - world domination.

Not once have I said, oh, I’m not sure, I’m worried, demand problem, Tesla’s in trouble because of this or that, oh, such and such quarter is pointing to implosion, et al. Not once because I actually believe, based on heavy research, watching quietly from the sidelines, waiting patiently for the actual company results - not guessing, not speculating, not trying to stir the pot, upset the natives, trick myself - that Tesla and the people running this company really are different and special. These people who at every turn have successfully navigated every obstacle over the last decade+, while the likes of you waved your arms, ‘omg, it’s not perfect!’

You have zero evidence they suddenly got stupid and don’t know how to balance price adjustments, cost efficiencies, foreign currency changes, gross margins, free cash flow, debt, demand etc…

So, yeah. Save your ‘I’m saving you from an echo chamber and hiding your head in the sand bs’ for someone who hasn’t got a clue or wants to play with the options casino game with the crooks.
 
What you are confusing is how pricing and demand works.

Listen up, I'll only explain this once.

You make it appear the only reason Tesla drops vehicle pricing is since at current pricing there is no (or not enough) demand. This is not accurate. Demand for vehicles comes and goes in waves (aka demand bubbles and pockets), geographically and chronologically. Q1 has the lowest demand, but Q4 generally has higher demand. (generally, this isn't set in stone)

Geographically / chronologically demand can also swing with incentives starting, running out or being announced. Think IRA, think incentives that are different per country.

Economic factors (per country/region) also play a big role. Lots of wildfires in California? -> less demand that time. Unstable government or energy crisis? -> possibly less demand.

The list goes on and on.
But you know: over time there is still plenty of demand for all vehicles Tesla produces.

However, if Tesla has to sit around keeping inventory until their production gets sold out at higher pricing, this has financial downsides:
- time between production and delivery should be as short as possible, this way Tesla can receive money from the customer before paying suppliers;
- higher inventory has a cost associated with it, to keep these cars in stock/neat/charged/not degrading/etc
- ...

I think we can agree holding on to built cars carries a cost and risk.

Imagine Tesla has a smart team looking at the numbers and comparing the costs associated with holding on to inventory longer on the one end to dropping prices and increasing immediate demand (I should say: increasing demand even more) so the cars get delivered quicker on the other hand. Nobody disagrees that lowering prices creates more demand, but they do disagree with you that Tesla MUST drop prices or else they cannot sell all their production.

The current inflation/recession fears have created less demand than usual, that may be true. But the second the FED starts cutting rates and the market turns around, their will be more demand. It swings in roundabouts.

By lowering prices and shortening the amount of time between production and delivery, Tesla is:
- decreasing costs of holding on to inventory;
- sticking it to the competition that cannot profitably make BEV's;
- increasing the demand for their vehicles to a much higher degree than their increased production, increasing brand awareness;
- passing on cost savings (due to lower COGS) to the customer;
- receiving a lot of market data regarding demand in different regions and regarding certain models. All this data is considered when making price adjustments (per model, per region, at certain times).

So please don't act like Tesla is worried and dropping prices in the hope to be able to sell their vehicles. They're doing so because the profits are similar but they get a lot smoother delivery process going on, without having to deal with the wave and a lot of "bumps in the road" (demand pockets/bubbles). Clever pricing smooths out a lot of these issues at nearly no cost.

Many are also not considering that since Berlin is ramping, the Berlin models for example can be sold at lower prices in Europe with the same profit, since the transport/import costs from Shanghai to EU are massive compared to production of the same model (Y currently) in the EU. Within 48 hours of rolling of the line the Berlin car can be anywhere in the EU. Shanghai takes weeks and at much higher cost.

TL;DR: stop with the doom and gloom. There is no demand issue. Tesla is just optimizing pricing vs delivery waves/demand per region in a clever way.

And IF somehow Tesla is forced to drop pricing due to not enough demand, this is temporary due to macro-economic issues and the same goes for all other automakers too. This cannot be held against Tesla compared to its competitors.

I said I'll I have to say on this. Now please don't repeat your arguments without backing it up with facts, not speculation.
I copied this across here:
EV and Battery Credits
Suggest any continuation is held there.
 
  • Like
Reactions: UncaNed