You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Dealers are struggling right now. Their funding for inventory is really drying up. Read a few articles on this and talked to a buddy who works in the business. Apparently the usual line of credit is around 6 months with no interest for dealers. Without that they will be pressed to keep up inventories which will dampen sales by legacy.I think falling prices for new cars are going to be an issue for people that bought in 2022 if they liked flipping cars.
Quite a drop from yesterday's $182.5. Have not seen a drop like that in a loooong time.For what it's worth, max pain today is $170
That does work, for both loans and leases. However the further upscale one goes the better the odds they'll really understand. Maybe 1% of qualified buyers understand how leases really work, much less the arcane residual value, Capitalized cost, money factor and use limitations issues. The benefit of the low rates invariably benefits loans but only when it is clear that they're special. For cars even high end buyers understand the principal of subvention, even if they do not understand the term. They also expect dealers to sell 'adds' at F&I time.Low-interest financing for qualified customers. Match the FED up for down. @CorneliusXX @unk45 thoughts?
At the time seat belts were viewed negatively as government reach and "they kill more people than they save". There are countless wrecks Tesla could point to with sentiment from 1st responders as to no other car would have saved the occupants.From 1956 when Ford tried to sell seat belts, following Volvo's introduction it has been clear that safety does not sell cars. Raising Volvo, a company that has failed and been rescued repeatedly, and still struggles with Geely is really a BAD idea. (note: I do own an XC40 Recharge).
On the charging issue Tesla has been doing the 21st century approach, letting every EV owner have a sample of 'the Tesla life'. That generates all the publicity and allows people to gradually change views without trying 'logical advertising' approach. Here @phoggy123 has crisply pointed out the huge dilemma. Understanding that nearly every vested interest wants to impede understanding how practical long distance Tesla's can be, the only way to begin the process is informally, with non-Tesla use of Tesla infrastructure. Slow, yes, but...
The direct 'fact checker' approach is direct and emotionally satisfying. The problem is that by taking that approach the people you're trying to convince are reinforced in their suspicions.
That reality is easiest to see in politics where 'fact checkers' end out reinforcing the very thing they've proven is false. BEV limitations are very much seen in that context. Because of that illogical but true problem, the best approach is simply to have unsponsored, mostly undiscussed demonstrations.
I was actually just thinking this (although I know you were kidding in this case). Remember the signs of old days saying "Eat Here and get Gas"? Well, the convenience store/gas stations of today could post a new one: "Eat Here and get Charged". No, really.I think they should put big rotating neon Tesla signs up at all their supercharger stations - like McDonalds does.
WTF was that plan?Article from Autonews about Toyota's new EV plan. Sounds eerily familiar.
New Toyota CEO Sato Touts Three-step Plan To Big EV Profitability: ‘We've Just Started' - WorldNewsEra
TOKYO – For Toyota Motor Corp. raking in big profits from electric vehicles is as easy as 1, 2, 3.worldnewsera.com
Presumably people who are purchasing an X (or S) aren't that concerned about inflation.Strange that Tesla raised the price on the X considering the inventory levels that are showing, but I'll take anything that goes against the "we'll sell cars without profit" narrative.
Snapped up a baker's dozen today.I'm personally not worried about Tesla dropping in SP in the near future since I'm still accumulating. Luckily, I'm an investor and not a speculator! Probably picking up about a share/month if you add up Tesla in the S&P index funds I buy in both our 401k's every week, IRA's every month, and brokerage every week or two. I don't mind buying it on sale.
I let a very shy 7 yr old experience my Tesla a few days ago. The door handle was a puzzle, fart mode was a giggle, santa mode was a look of awe, romance mode was ‘can we make s’mores?’, the arcade was overwhelming, but sketch pad was intriguing.Even in rural Scotland little boys point excitedly at passing Teslas. The younger generation already know. They just need the money (and to become driving age) My 23 yr son old got his first drive of my M3P the other day. Needless to say his obsession with german hot hatches has evaporated.
Despite the assertion that is rarely, if ever, true. Floor planning is a quite well documented art and here is the most recent Automotive News article:Dealers are struggling right now. Their funding for inventory is really drying up. Read a few articles on this and talked to a buddy who works in the business. Apparently the usual line of credit is around 6 months with no interest for dealers. Without that they will be pressed to keep up inventories which will dampen sales by legacy.
Capital One exits floorplan lending business
Capital One decided to exit floorplan lending on March 29, but will stay in the auto finance business.www.autonews.com
Agreed. More Teslas will be sold by owners than will ever be sold by advertising.From 1956 when Ford tried to sell seat belts, following Volvo's introduction it has been clear that safety does not sell cars. Raising Volvo, a company that has failed and been rescued repeatedly, and still struggles with Geely is really a BAD idea. (note: I do own an XC40 Recharge).
On the charging issue Tesla has been doing the 21st century approach, letting every EV owner have a sample of 'the Tesla life'. That generates all the publicity and allows people to gradually change views without trying 'logical advertising' approach. Here @phoggy123 has crisply pointed out the huge dilemma. Understanding that nearly every vested interest wants to impede understanding how practical long distance Tesla's can be, the only way to begin the process is informally, with non-Tesla use of Tesla infrastructure. Slow, yes, but...
The direct 'fact checker' approach is direct and emotionally satisfying. The problem is that by taking that approach the people you're trying to convince are reinforced in their suspicions.
That reality is easiest to see in politics where 'fact checkers' end out reinforcing the very thing they've proven is false. BEV limitations are very much seen in that context. Because of that illogical but true problem, the best approach is simply to have unsponsored, mostly undiscussed demonstrations.
From 1956 when Ford tried to sell seat belts, following Volvo's introduction
Tesla could make a nerfed FSD for Europe. I would upgrade immidiately. Did not pay anything extra for Autopilot when bought a TM3 in january. Did not see the point.
I love the current nerfed basic Autopilot. And would upgrade to nerfed FSD if they enforced hands on the wheel, slow speed trough tight curves, manual verification of lane changes and whatever else I have forgotten. It would still be wildly better than what we have now here in Europe.