Thus far ICE is the only real competition for Tesla. Wasn't it just a month ago Ford was saying there was no interest in their EVs so they were going to hybrids?But I thought ICE was the competition...
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Thus far ICE is the only real competition for Tesla. Wasn't it just a month ago Ford was saying there was no interest in their EVs so they were going to hybrids?But I thought ICE was the competition...
Agreed 100%. But if you just google 'TSLA' you get a bunch of ignorant stories with titles like 'Tesla down as panasonic cuts EV batteries due to low demand'. Its just an absolute brainless zero-comprehension take on the actual facts.Market really seems to be reading Tesla incorrectly right now. The Panasonic news is neutral to positive for Tesla at the core. Other OEM struggles with EVs just increase Tesla's market share and backstop volume numbers.
Tesla also seems to be a little more careful with capital spend, slowing down some of the construction work to a more strategic rather than breakneck speed.
Interest rates should be reversing course slowly as well. I just don't get the negativity with the stock price under $230.
His reasoning for Toyota catching up was mainly just based on extrapolating from Toyota's past track record of beating the expectations of doubters and of being the lowest-cost producer. He also said that Toyota's $300B market cap indicated that the market believes Toyota will come through.Trust me. It's worth a listen. I don't agree with him on Toyota either. I just don't see how Toyota can catch up.
He explains his reasoning later and I'm pretty sure he knows more about Toyota than anyone here. So while I might not agree, I don't dismiss him.
Plus there would be a new model every year that all the Applites would have to have and I doubt they would fit in their present facilities... unless they're foldable...Seems it's new M3 chips: iPad Mini, MacBook Pro, and Magic Keyboard Batteries Resubmitted to Regulatory Database Ahead of Apple Event
In any case, if Apple ever did make a BEV, can you possibly imagine it would be "fast"? They' wouldn't care sell a car that might actually injure anyone, would be too politically incorrect
you get a bunch of ignorant stories with titles like 'Tesla down as panasonic cuts EV batteries due to low demand'. Its just an absolute brainless zero-comprehension take on the actual facts.
"Rapidly reduced demand" It's difficult to say if it will impact the S/X, but that's certainly the take from investors today.What is the reason Panasonic is cutting EV batteries production? Does this impact Model S/X or not?
Precisely - where are Toyotas strategic tech investments into actual Battery production capacity and related supply chain, just to mention one critical ingredient. BYOB ?[...].
I learned some new stuff from listening to this interview, but based on the guest's background and commentary it's clear he is not especially knowledgable of the engineering/technology/manufacturing aspects of this topic, which I think is essential to understanding it.
Is this something new?Agreed 100%. But if you just google 'TSLA' you get a bunch of ignorant stories with titles like 'Tesla down as panasonic cuts EV batteries due to low demand'. Its just an absolute brainless zero-comprehension take on the actual facts.
My guess is battery production growth might be outpacing EV production growth? Just over 1 year ago Martin Viecha said “For the first time I can remember, we can access all the supply we need for both businesses.” From that point forward, with the impact of the economy and interest rates, it's feasible. MS/MX sales do appear to be materially slowing and we know Legacy is dragging their feet. I'm thinking this is a positive for Tesla who doesn't sell batteries, rather they are COGS in their products...What is the reason Panasonic is cutting EV batteries production? Does this relate to Model S/X or not?
What is ignorant or misleading about this?Agreed 100%. But if you just google 'TSLA' you get a bunch of ignorant stories with titles like 'Tesla down as panasonic cuts EV batteries due to low demand'.
Tesla built less S and X last quarter, so needed roughly 40 million less [18650] cells from Panasonic Japan. As a result, Panasonic is making less cells.What is the reason Panasonic is cutting EV batteries production? Does this relate to Model S/X or not?
You mean 18650s, but your point remains.Tesla built less S and X last quarter, so needed roughly 40 million less 2170 cells from Panasonic Japan. As a result, Panasonic is making less cells.
Tesla is the horse, Panasonic is the cart. Today's reaction is (posdibly) due to people thinking the reverse.
What is ignorant or misleading about this?
Is it the correlation of Tesla dropping so much with that story? Panasonic said in their official statement that they were cutting back on EV batteries due to rapidly reduced demand. Tesla shares were down afterward. Many believe they are related...seems like a fair headline, no?
It's odd people are focusing on Model S/X, when Panasonic also makes the US 2170s in the 3/Y, which are selling well. I believe the Berlin and China 3/Y use BYD versions (may be wrong there)Yes, it is a fair headline. Only, we know that it should be interpreted as,
"Panasonic said in their official statement that they were cutting back on EV batteries due to some of their customers being unable to market their EV's against Tesla's dominance in the marketplace. We will be ramping up again as Tesla's production demands call for yet more batteries"
I agree.His reasoning for Toyota catching up was mainly just based on extrapolating from Toyota's past track record of beating the expectations of doubters and of being the lowest-cost producer. He also said that Toyota's $300B market cap indicated that the market believes Toyota will come through.
He even was said that his expectation was "heuristic", and did not provide any specific, concrete reasons for why Toyota would be able to accomplish the transition successfully or why being the lowest-cost producer of ICEVs would translate to being the lowest-cost producer of EVs.
I learned some new stuff from listening to this interview, but based on the guest's background and commentary it's clear he is not especially knowledgable of the engineering/technology/manufacturing aspects of this topic, which I think is essential to understanding it.
That guy has a really bad head wobble, but the Cybertruck looks great
To be fair, I don't remember when market was reading Tesla correctly, if ever.Market really seems to be reading Tesla incorrectly right now. The Panasonic news is neutral to positive for Tesla at the core. Other OEM struggles with EVs just increase Tesla's market share and backstop volume numbers.
Tesla also seems to be a little more careful with capital spend, slowing down some of the construction work to a more strategic rather than breakneck speed.
Interest rates should be reversing course slowly as well. I just don't get the negativity with the stock price under $230.
The use of the word heuristic is itself interesting since it is a synonym for ‘curiosity’ or in statistics ‘random’. It is a word that makes sense only in PR. In statistics it is usually an excuse for finding causality, so the modelers sell correlation instead.His reasoning for Toyota catching up was mainly just based on extrapolating from Toyota's past track record of beating the expectations of doubters and of being the lowest-cost producer. He also said that Toyota's $300B market cap indicated that the market believes Toyota will come through.
He even was said that his expectation was "heuristic", and did not provide any specific, concrete reasons for why Toyota would be able to accomplish the transition successfully or why being the lowest-cost producer of ICEVs would translate to being the lowest-cost producer of EVs.
I learned some new stuff from listening to this interview, but based on the guest's background and commentary it's clear he is not especially knowledgable of the engineering/technology/manufacturing aspects of this topic, which I think is essential to understanding it.