Welcome to Tesla Motors Club
Discuss Tesla's Model S, Model 3, Model X, Model Y, Cybertruck, Roadster and More.
Register

Tesla, TSLA & the Investment World: the Perpetual Investors' Roundtable

This site may earn commission on affiliate links.
One additional observation: unless you returned immediately after arriving in Vegas (courier run), some of the charge time (a high percentage in a Tesla) is negated by actually being there.

Distance: 260 miles. Range of Model 3 LR: 325:
On a good day, no charging would be needed on the way to Vegas, let the car fill at the hotel or casino, no charging needed on the way back. Net result: faster than an ICE that needed a fill up before starting the trip and another on the way back, plus another the next day.

Great short summary.

I took the liberty of tweeting something close to this to the author Ivan Penn’s twitter account:
Ivan Penn (@ivanlpenn) | Twitter

And also to Kevin McKenna, Deputy Business Editor of NYT:
Kevin McKenna (@kemcke) on Twitter
 
Nope, it's very common to wear mask to protect yourself in Asia.
In Beijing in *1986* it was standard to wear a face mask because of the air pollution. It didn't help much but it was better than nothing. The air pollution has apparently gotten much worse since then. I'm quite sure all the people in Shanghai are wearing face masks because of air pollution.

"Bioweapon Defense Mode" will be on most of the time in Chinese cities. :-(
 
BTW., in principle the prototype factory could be built at the mystery "parts distribution center" at Lathrop:


If it's indeed basically a giant machine, then all it needs externally are loading bays for the incoming parts. Having it relatively close to Fremont would allow the use of all the automation and factory maintenance talent of Tesla.

Note that Tesla always had parts manufacturing facilities at Lathrop, and characterized them the following way in the recent 10-K for 2018:

Code:
                     Approximate                               Lease
                     Size (Building)                           Expiration
Location             in Square Feet        Primary Use         Date
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lathrop,             496,888               Manufacturing       Owned building
California

In the 2017 annual report they characterized the new Lathrop facility as:

Code:
                        Approximate                              Lease
                        Size (Building)                          Expiration
Location                in Square Feet    Primary Use            Date
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lathrop, California     338,564           Warehouse and          February 2030
                                          manufacturing
Lathrop, California     276,228           Warehouse and          September 2024
                                          manufacturing
Lathrop, California     271,075           Manufacturing          May 2025

Pure warehouses are reported by Tesla the following way:

Code:
                     Approximate                               Lease
                     Size (Building)                           Expiration
Location             in Square Feet        Primary Use         Date
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sparks, Nevada       632,445               Warehouse           December 2019 -
                                                               December 2020

But in the 2018 10-K they consolidated the new building into a single reported unit:

Code:
                     Approximate                               Lease
                     Size (Building)                           Expiration
Location             in Square Feet        Primary Use         Date
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lathrop,             885,867               Warehouse and       September 2024 -
California                                 manufacturing       February 2030

Note that 885,867 square feet is exactly the sum of the three entries from the 2017 annual report.

Also note that while the new building is characterized as a 'warehouse', it is also characterized as a 'manufacturing' facility, which would be weird if it's solely a parts distribution center, IMHO.

So while the default guess is that it's a parts distribution center that might host some of the warehouse space that the Model Y production lines at Fremont will occupy, I think there's still a chance that the new Lathrop "parts distribution center" facility is a "Gigafactory hidden in plain sight", which might host the new "gigantic, gigantic, gigantic" Grohmann Machine that Jerome Guillen teased. :D

Both Lathrop and GF3 have a similar design, with one side of the building consisting of dozens of loading bays. This is typical for a warehouse, so does not provide any clues to Lathrop's purpose. But we know GF3 is not a warehouse. So those loading docks are a clear indication that it will have a different supply system than the Fremont factory. It could even be in preparation for a modular system.

Question remains: will Lathrop also serve as a production facility? It's amazing that so far no journalist during a conference call has asked what this huge building is for, even though it is virtually completed now.
 
Great short summary.

I took the liberty of tweeting something close to this to the author Ivan Penn’s twitter account:
Ivan Penn (@ivanlpenn) | Twitter

And also to Kevin McKenna, Deputy Business Editor of NYT:
Kevin McKenna (@kemcke) on Twitter

I was so mad about how biased that article was that I made quite a lot of polite and informative tweets pointing out how easy it was to do road trips in Teslas -- and also quoted the woman who does LA-Las Vegas trips in her Bolt *routinely* who showed up at the CleanTechnica article.

Do your best to be polite, guys. In this context it is more effective. Maybe Penn and McKenna are just fools who don't understand anything about electric cars; if so, politeness may help get them to learn. If they're malicious, being polite to them makes them look worse.
 
So those loading docks are a clear indication that it will have a different supply system than the Fremont factory. It could even be in preparation for a modular system.

Elon did say that it worked way better to back a Semi up to the "tent" to supply parts, instead of unloading them into "bins" that then get stored, and then pull the stored bins and haul them to the assembly line. So yeah, I think the plan is to have trucks unload at the point of usage to avoid moving parts multiple times.
 
Two Gigafactories building batteries planned in Europe. I have this info from a radio broadcast I randomly caught in my car.

Comparable in size to Tesla in Nevada newcomers Freyr in Norway and Northvolt in Sweden are the only two battery cell factories planned in Europe. There are other battery factories planned - but they assemble batteries from cells they buy from existing producers. These new factories will make the actual cells needed.

Northvolt has completed it's first equity capital raise for their factory in Skellefteå. Volkswagen and BMW are among their investors.

Freyr started later and have announced plans for a factory in Mo i Rana. SINTEF partner announces plans to build a battery cell giga-factory in Norway - SINTEF
The local government in Mo i Rana has prioritized this project: Full sal da Freyr presenterte sine planer for batterifabrikk og vindmøllepark på Helgeland

In the Radio interview Freyr gründer Torstein Dale Sjøtveit - Wikipedia said that Northvolt and Freyr wasn't competitors in the traditional sense. The potential market for battery cells is so huge they will complement each other and develop a world class battery production environment in Scandinavia.

Torstein Dale Sjøtveit estimated the market to be 400 GWh or enough to supply 6 mill cars per year. And both factories plan to start with 16GWh capacity with room to expand.
Are these Tesla factories?
 
Ladies & gents, boys & girls, I present you to LA Times “reporter”, with a NYT “reporter” tagging along :rolleyes:

View attachment 422178
View attachment 422180

Fun fact: Russ blocked Trev for that tweet which included the word “crap”.:eek:

IMHO very important to respond in very polite terms, with nothing that could even be construed as an insult. Don’t give them the excuse to ignore you, and remember you are mostly talking not to them but to their readers. @KarenRei made this point recently, find some way to engage them, offer to supply some information and a different perspective. Won’t always work but worth a try.
 

At this point, Russ Mitchell is a special case, like Mark Spiegel and Larry Fossi and Anton Wahlmann and the guy who was threatening Tesla employees. Mitchell is clearly malicious. His editor is not malicious, and you were very polite to her about why she should fire him.

Ivan Penn doesn't have a record of association with such awful people as Spiegel and Fossi. Give him the benefit of the doubt, assume he was just a foolish person who didn't do his research... until proven otherwise.
 
Ivan Penn doesn't have a record of association with such awful people as Spiegel and Fossi. Give him the benefit of the doubt, assume he was just a foolish person who didn't do his research... until proven otherwise.
Agree. I suggested that he chat with Casey Neistat

I am polite with most of them except maybe Tweety (Ed Neidermeyer).:rolleyes:.. But he has blocked me anyway
 
For newer members interested in Seeking Alpha's long history of biased handling of TSLA, there is quite a bit of useful information in this thread: Seeking Alpha and Tesla: Fair or FUD?

If there is new information on the topic, it might be good to discuss it in that thread so it is all in one place, especially since Seeking Alpha shows no sign of reforming any time soon.
 
In Beijing in *1986* it was standard to wear a face mask because of the air pollution. It didn't help much but it was better than nothing. The air pollution has apparently gotten much worse since then. I'm quite sure all the people in Shanghai are wearing face masks because of air pollution.

"Bioweapon Defense Mode" will be on most of the time in Chinese cities. :-(

While that might be true of Beijing, the Shanghai Gigafactory is a greenfield construction in the middle of nowhere, on former farmland, still surrounded by farmland, with very few industrial facilities nearby. Shanghai is also a coastal city, with a lot lower air pollution problems than cities that are more inland.

I'm pretty sure the face masks are primarily worn for the main reason why they are worn in the west: workplace safety, painting work is still going on, there's dangerous solvents and particulates in the air. If you look at the locals in the Shanghai Gigafactory videos, very few of them are wearing face masks.
 
While that might be true of Beijing, the Shanghai Gigafactory is a greenfield construction in the middle of nowhere, on former farmland, still surrounded by farmland, with very few industrial facilities nearby. Shanghai is also a coastal city, with a lot lower air pollution problems than cities that are more inland.

I'm pretty sure the face masks are primarily worn for the main reason why they are worn in the west: workplace safety, painting work is still going on, there's dangerous solvents and particulates in the air. If you look at the locals in the Shanghai Gigafactory videos, very few of them are wearing face masks.
I just traveled from Beijing to Shanghai in the marvelous high speed rail, 200mph, unfortunately the train was in smog almost the entire time