Our reactions:
1. First of all, as with every vehicle that I, at least, ever have owned, I really, truly don't give a rat's patooty what its outside looks like, down to the wheel rims (Jenny: "deep down since we live in a car culture I - and you, dear husband also do - care"). I'll take function over form.
2. I've owned a lot pickup trucks (plus a passel of Land Cruisers and 3 vans). 2 with 6 1/2' beds and 7 with 8-footers. It's very difficult for me to consider a 6 1/2 footer. IF the tailgate is stout enough to act as a bed extender - and that is not an immensely difficult task - then that vehicle's utility increases but we're already deep into the discussion of Americentric Pickup Truck! vs Eurocentric Enclosed Van! that I find myself in so much. (...and our current Sprinter van can carry, nicely protected against all weather, 16' boards...)
3. The interior looks, to me, satisfactory. Not so capacious in any dimension as that of our current F-350, however, other than one very important one: Jenny HATES the front passenger footwell in the Ford: the tranny hump diminishes her leg/foot space so much that on long trips she'll sit in the rear. Never a problem in any Tesla or probably any EV from anyone. But those jump seats in both front and back of the Cybertruck look rather skimpy. And WHAT is the rear seat headroom? With that roof rake, it looks limiting. Not a problem for the jr. high soccer team, but a work crew? That's important to learn. Rear legroom looks a bit cramped - but will reserve judgment until know for sure.
4. Love the exoskeleton in its ramifications for the vehicle's strength; love that stainless steel for its shrugging off arctic tundra willows and Sonoran desert mesquite...and the odd sledgehammer.
5. Others have commented on the presentation fail. Won't repeat.
6. Late 2022 is far enough out that it gives Tesla time to extend its SpC network north to Alaska. That is and always has been the #1 Go/NoGo criterion for us. Without it - and without a network of SpCs in Alaska as well - then the truck is not of interest to us. With it, and I'll get one. Or two. I'm suspecting from the viewpoint of November, 2019, that the charger network will NOT be ready by then. I also, on the other hand, suspect by then I'll be three + years older. And counting.
On edit:
7. I had earlier commented on the importance for me in understanding what means Tesla would be using to suspend the vehicle, and that an absolute minimum of 100mm (4") of height adjustment would be necessary for it to begin to be considered as off-roadable. We did not learn the first, other than it being effected with air; as regards the second, there was the cryptic 4" in each direction for a maximum clearance of 16". I'll take that to mean 8" of adjustment possible....which, if true, is really, really terrific, both for high-speed aerodynamics and low-speed rock crawling.
