It worked. LOL 464Quick, go back to Slate!
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It worked. LOL 464Quick, go back to Slate!
thats the beauty of it.. just new support levels. ;-DNo resistance when you’re breaking into new highs
Brand dilution is much more of a problem in North America than outside. And, as this may be a product not intended for the US...
I mean, you have Audi going as low as €20,300 (I believe that's after taxes, too) in the German market (with the A1, which would pretty directly compete against a smaller Tesla if it is smaller), and as high as €222,000 before options (with the R8, which competes somewhat directly against the Roadster in terms of role and price, if not performance).
460 isn't cracked if that what you are suggesting. 463.64 could be pulled back with a quick dump at a quiet time. Remember, the 'lunch lull' during times of low trading vol inevitably gets the shortzes back on their horses.So anyone want to suggest the next resistance level?
Asking for enlightenment from our knowing long time investment elders-I'm happy to have sold a LEAP call 360 that I bought 22 months ago. Bought at $67, sold $102, net $35, gain 52%.
The stock price was $328. Had I bought stock and held to $462 (matching times with the option trade), I would have had a gain of 41%. So the call option boosted my gain an extra 11%. But I have been extraordinary lucky with the timing of this sell. Most of the 22 months I held the call is was sitting on a pretty serious unrealized loss. The price had fallen to a low of $0.68 last September. Mostly the price was so low that there was really no point in selling it and realizing the loss. I held it on the off chance that I might just get lucky.
So in hindsight, I think I would have been much happier had I simply bought shares rather than this option. But I'm not complaining, I'll take a 52% gain on dumb luck over a 99% loss on bitter folly.
Live and learn.
How do you reconcile these 2?I'm about 50% cash ...
...
In the short term, I think TSLA has at least another $100 bux to run.
500So anyone want to suggest the next resistance level?
I was more the buy and forget investor those days. I completely missed the drama. Oh boy, what a shame. I woke up when my shares already were 5x or 6x and was like Holy shite, wtf ?!?I have to ask any old TMC members (old on TMC, not necessarily of age): is this what 2013 felt like? I'm trying to get work done... it's so damn hard to focus on anything other than the unmentionable!
Barron's - 6 minutes ago: Tesla Is the Most Valuable Car Company In America Ever
I'm happy to have sold a LEAP call 360 that I bought 22 months ago. Bought at $67, sold $102, net $35, gain 52%.
The stock price was $328. Had I bought stock and held to $462 (matching times with the option trade), I would have had a gain of 41%. So the call option boosted my gain an extra 11%. But I have been extraordinary lucky with the timing of this sell. Most of the 22 months I held the call is was sitting on a pretty serious unrealized loss. The price had fallen to a low of $0.68 last September. Mostly the price was so low that there was really no point in selling it and realizing the loss. I held it on the off chance that I might just get lucky.
So in hindsight, I think I would have been much happier had I simply bought shares rather than this option. But I'm not complaining, I'll take a 52% gain on dumb luck over a 99% loss on bitter folly.
Live and learn.
I wish I could do that. Instead, I'm wide awake, living on coffee and the stock ticker...I was more the buy and forget investor those days. I completely missed the drama. Oh boy, what a shame. I woke up when my shares already were 5x or 6x and was like Holy shite, wtf ?!?
As an investor, you should know that's a matter of opinion. I'm not saying I agree or disagree (as I haven't analyzed her spreads), just that there is no 100% objective way to determine the actual risk. It's a matter of opinion because the business and investment world is not a cookie-cutter world that can be represented by neat mathematical formulas. If it were, computers could allocate all capital for the cost of maintaining the computers and investors would all receive the same return on their capital.
How is risk aversion measured in modern portfolio theory (MPT)?Those who are more risk averse tend to want assets with lower standard deviations. A lower deviation from the mean suggests the asset's price experiences less volatility and there is a lower probability for major loss. Aggressive investors are comfortable with a higher standard deviation because it suggests higher returns are also possible.
Asking for enlightenment from our knowing long time investment elders-
Notwithstanding that one of us lost like $500,000 on call options (and then traded their way back up again), aren't the odds significantly against a long term Call expiring worthless with TSLA LEAPs? Wasn't @jhm mostly unlucky, and it was a gamble that will likely pay off most of the time with TSLA?
I really appreciate these discussions as I'm teaching myself the basics of options, learning by doing but wondering if I am actually drowning in the Dunning-Kruger effect and don't know it or something.
Oh no Elon tweeted about PornHub. Someone cut him off.