Driver Dave
Member
Not many companies could have the CEO say stock too high imo one week, and start the week up the next.
TSLA Long
Nothing can stop it...
TSLA Long
Nothing can stop it...
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The problem is that when the designers and engineers are remote, you get the 2013 S' defroster that wouldn't defog the driver's side of the windshield (because the designers never experienced actual winter driving). They need to be together or there will be issues.Um Fremont is crazy inefficient because it's a mishmash of different production lines that were added at different times. While the Bay Area has great engineering talent, that's not needed for manufacturing line workers.
I think that is saving pennies to lose dollars. My point about engineering talent has nothing to do with line workers. This factory is "messy" because it has been their laboratory for iterating and innovating in manufacturing. If a fancy robot breaks at a Ford plant, a contractor is called and line workers twiddle their thumbs. If it breaks at Fremont, and it's important enough, they have some of the smartest engineers in the company (and often the CEO) available to drive over within the hour. Once they have some slack they can slow things down there, but we are far from that point IMO.Um Fremont is crazy inefficient because it's a mishmash of different production lines that were added at different times. While the Bay Area has great engineering talent, that's not needed for manufacturing line workers. The S/X will need to majorly updated or revamped considering its fundamentally the same line they've had for years. They could easily drop the prices of the S/X by moving production to Giga 1 on the cost savings which would then lead to greater demand for the vehicles.
On a cost basis, it would save a ton of money to move manufacturing out of Fremont. Tons of money. California and the Bay Area is super expensive for manufacturing.
I am very confused by the rules, especially rule 3.
The testing goal is 200/100k/d. The 7 day average is 28 for Alameda county? So if the current trend keeps going, fewer cases every day and less and less people need/want testing, then the 200/d goal will NEVER be achieved? So the lockdown can go forever because it is so effective and self-strengthening?
On the other hand, it is so easy for telsa to force the end of lockdown, take the deeds in its hand and meet the 5 rules, actually only rule 3 and 5 are not met for the county.
1. buy tests and start testing tsla employees residing in the county NOW. The county has 1.7m population. So tsla only needs to test 3500 employee per day.
2. buy 30 days of PPE and donate to the county medical facilities.
It will only cost several million. Tsla shareholders are losing billions due to the lockdown.
I think that is saving pennies to lose dollars. My point about engineering talent has nothing to do with line workers. This factory is "messy" because it has been their laboratory for iterating and innovating in manufacturing. If a fancy robot breaks at a Ford plant, a contractor is called and line workers twiddle their thumbs. If it breaks at Fremont, and it's important enough, they have some of the smartest engineers in the company (and often the CEO) available to drive over within the hour. Once they have some slack they can slow things down there, but we are far from that point IMO.
I think that is saving pennies to lose dollars. My point about engineering talent has nothing to do with line workers. This factory is "messy" because it has been their laboratory for iterating and innovating in manufacturing. If a fancy robot breaks at a Ford plant, a contractor is called and line workers twiddle their thumbs. If it breaks at Fremont, and it's important enough, they have some of the smartest engineers in the company (and often the CEO) available to drive over within the hour. Once they have some slack they can slow things down there, but we are far from that point IMO.
Honestly I think it would be about 50/50. People talk big about "moving to TX or FL for tax purposes!", but most people aren't really interested in actually living there.If they moved their HQ to, say, Austin for the new GF, do you think that those Engineers will all just shrug and find someone nearer in California? Or would they follow the business they believe in, and feel like they can succeed at and make a difference?
Fremont is not optimized. But it is not ‘crazy inefficient’ either. During this downtime I hope they used some of it to clean up and further optimize.Um Fremont is crazy inefficient because it's a mishmash of different production lines that were added at different times. While the Bay Area has great engineering talent, that's not needed for manufacturing line workers. The S/X will need to majorly updated or revamped considering its fundamentally the same line they've had for years. They could easily drop the prices of the S/X by moving production to Giga 1 on the cost savings which would then lead to greater demand for the vehicles.
On a cost basis, it would save a ton of money to move manufacturing out of Fremont. Tons of money. California and the Bay Area is super expensive for manufacturing.
I'll see that and raise you:
View attachment 538186
From my backyard.
In the Santa Cruz mountains, 12 minutes from the Valley
Somehow they are managing in Shanghai. And plan to in Berlin.I think that is saving pennies to lose dollars. My point about engineering talent has nothing to do with line workers. This factory is "messy" because it has been their laboratory for iterating and innovating in manufacturing. If a fancy robot breaks at a Ford plant, a contractor is called and line workers twiddle their thumbs. If it breaks at Fremont, and it's important enough, they have some of the smartest engineers in the company (and often the CEO) available to drive over within the hour. Once they have some slack they can slow things down there, but we are far from that point IMO.
For TSLA, it’s “buy in May, we’re here to stay!”"The Sell In May And Go Away" works under normal conditions ... Not this time ... Market looking to rebound as soon as economy starts humming back.
If Ants cannot work, grasshoppers cannot hop ....
Fremont is not optimized. But it is not ‘crazy inefficient’ either. During this downtime I hope they used some of it to clean up and further optimize.
And if they shrug, engineers from UT, Rice, etc are right handy.Yeah, but Fremont formed when Tesla was still a no-name brand. Now, they've got the pick of each graduating class for all of the top tier engineering schools in the States, if not the world.
If they moved their HQ to, say, Austin for the new GF, do you think that those Engineers will all just shrug and find someone nearer in California? Or would they follow the business they believe in, and feel like they can succeed at and make a difference?
Currently the list of local county officials ask to modify or defy or filed suit Gov. Newsom's Stay-in-Home order as of today:
California has 58 counties, so that represents 12% of counties.
- Riverside
- Orange
- Modoc
- Kern
- San Luis Obispo
- Sutter
- Yuba
Not all counties that requested modification of Shelter-in-Place order are Republican leaning. We shall see if the number of counties can go to double digit by the end of week. If 1/4 of counties request modification of Shelter-in-Place then a state-wide restriction will be rendered useless.
Wow, hard to beat that view in the US. Maybe I should move to CA
Honestly I think it would be about 50/50. People talk big about "moving to TX or FL for tax purposes!", but most people aren't really interested in actually living there.